/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67405278/usa_today_10501502.0.jpg)
I’ve been holding off on this series, waiting for the 2021 class to be finalized, but alas, I need something to write about, and a few positions are set in stone.
Jeff Brohm has been the Purdue head coach for 5 (almost) recruiting classes, and I think it’s fair to evaluate his overall recruiting resume at Purdue. The Boilermakers have seen a recruiting surge compared to the Hazel era of Purdue, but that’s not even a low bar to clear, it’s more like a line in the dirt. What’s important is how Purdue stacks up against the rest of the Big10, on a position by position basis.
I hope this gives everyone a clearer idea about where Purdue is in recruiting, both good and bad. I’ll present the facts, and then give my own personal interpretation of the facts. Feel free to provide your own interpretation in the comment section, as I’m far from the final word in all things football recruiting.
A few quick notes:
Yes, I’m counting the 2017. I’ll be counting 2017-2021 for everyone. It’s too hard to parse out which classes do and don’t count for each team.
No, I’m not counting 2022. It’s tempting in this article, because Brady Allen would give the Boilermakers a boost, but I’m already stretching things with an unfinished 2021 class.
I’m not including transfers into program.
I’m using the 247 composite rankings.
I’m going to show my work in the body of the article. That gives you a chance to do your own math if you want (if you want to leave off Purdue’s 2017 recruiting class for example). If you want to see the quick and easy breakdown, scroll to the bottom of the page.
Big 10 Quarterback Recruiting 2017-2021
Purdue
2017
Nick Sipe - 3* - .8569
Griffin Alstott - 3* - .8342
2018
Jack Plummer - 3* - .8743
2019
Paul Piferi - 3* - .8581
2020
Michael Alaimo - 4* - .9071
2021
Sam Jackson - 4* - .8927
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 6
High - Michael Alaimo - .9071
Low - Griffin Alstott - .8342
Average - .8706
Illinois
2017
Cam Thomas - 3* - .8356
2018
Coran Taylor - 3* -.8580
MJ Rivers II - 3* - .8539
Matt Robinson - 3* - .8004
2019
None
2020
Deuce Spann - 3* - .8566
2021
Samari Collier - 3* - .8389
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 6
High - Coran Taylor - .8580
Low - Matt Robinson - .8004
Average - .8405
Indiana
2017
Nick Tronti - 3* - .8250
2018
Michael Penix Jr. - 3* - .8749
2019
None
2020
Dexter Williams II - 3* - .8511
2021
Donaven McCulley - 4* - .8939
Range and Average
Number of Recruits: 4
High - Donaven McCulley - .8939
Low - Nick Tronti - .8250
Average - .8612
Iowa
2017
Peyton Mansell - 3* - .8580
2018
Spencer Petras - 3* - .8858
2019
Alex Padilla - 3* - .8485
2020
Deuce Hogan - 3* - .8824
2021
Joey Labas - 3* - .8537
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 5
High - Spencer Petras - .8858
Low - Alex Padilla - .8485
Average - .8657
Maryland
2017
Kasim Hill - 4* - .9110
2018
Tyler DeSue - 3* - .8676
2019
Lance LeGendre - 4* - .9036
2020
None
2021
None
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 3
High - Kasim Hill - .9110
Low - Tyler DeSue - .8676
Average - .8941
Michigan State
2017
Rocky Lombardi - 3* - .8641
2018
Theo Day - 3* - .8898
Javez Alexander - 3* - .8378
2019
Payton Thorne - 3* - .8511
2020
Noah Kim - 3* -.8459
2021
Hampton Fay - 3* - .8493
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 6
High - Theo Day - .8898
Low - Javez Alexander - .8378
Average - .8563
Michigan
2017
Dylan McCaffrey - 4* - .9435
2018
Joe Milton - 4* - .9202
2019
Cade McNamara - 4* - .9052
2020
Dan Villari - 3* - .8464
2021
J.J. McCarthy - 5* - .9893
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 5
High - J.J. McCarthy - .9893
Low - Dan Villari - .8464
Average - .9209
Minnesota
2017
Tanner Morgan - 3* - .8375
2018
Victor Viramontes - 3* - .8851
2019
Jacob Clark - 3* - .8850
Cole Kramer - 3* .8519
2020
None
2021
Athan Kaliakmanis - 4* - .8988
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 5
High - Athan Kaliakmanis - .8988
Low - Tanner Morgan - .8375
Average - .8717
Nebraska
2017
Tristan Gebbia - 4* - .9248
2018
Adrian Martinez - 4* - .9423
2019
None
2020
Logan Smothers - 4* - .8975
2021
Heinrich Haarberg - 3* - .8702
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 4
High - Adrian Martinez - .9423
Low - Heinrich Haarberg - .8702
Average - .9087
Northwestern
2017
Andrew Marty - 3* - .8382
2018
Jason Whittaker - 3* - .8602
2019
None
2020
Carl Richardson - 3* - .8485
2021
Brendan Sullivan - 3* - .8622
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 4
High - Brendan Sullivan - .8622
Low - Andrew Marty - .8382
Average - .8523
Ohio State
2017
Tate Martell - 4* - .9739
2018
Matthew Baldwin - 4* - .8958
2019
None
2020
CJ Stroud - 4* - .9780
2021
Kyle McCord - 5* - .9882
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 4
High - Kyle McCord - .9882
Low - Matthew Baldwin - .8958
Average - .9590
Penn State
2017
Sean Clifford - 4* - .9223
2018
Will Levis - 3* - .8689
2019
Ta’Quan Roberson - 4* - .9045
Michael Johnson Jr. - 4* - .8905
2020
Micah Bowens - 3* - .8851
2021
Christian Veilleux - 3* - .8817
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 6
High - Sean Clifford - .9223
Low - Will Levis - .8689
Average - .8922
Rutgers
2017
Johnathan Lewis - 3* - .8558
2018
Artur Sitkowski - 3* - .8881
Jalen Chatman - 3* - .8410
2019
Cole Snyder - 3* - .8280
2020
Evan Simon - 3* - .8539
2021
None
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 5
High - Artur Sitkowski - .8881
Low - Cole Snyder - .8280
Average - .8534
Wisconsin
2017
Jack Coan - 3* - .8714
Danny Vanden Boom - 3* - .8106
2018
Chase Wolf - 3* - .8526
2019
Graham Mertz - 4* - .9689
2020
None
2021
Deacon Hill - 3* - .8791
Range and Average
Number of Recruits - 5
High - Graham Mertz - .9689
Low - Danny Vanden Boom - .8106
Average - .8765
Average QB Ranking 2017-2021
Ohio State - .9590
Michigan - .9209
Nebraska - .9087
Maryland - .8941
Penn State - .8922
Wisconsin - .8765
Minnesota - .8717
Purdue - .8706
Iowa - .8657
Indiana - .8612
Michigan State - .8563
Rutgers - .8534
Northwestern - .8523
Illinois - .8405
Highest Rated Recruit QB Recruit 2017 - 2021
Michigan - J.J. McCarthy - .9893
Ohio State - Kyle McCord - .9882
Wisconsin - Graham Mertz - .9689
Nebraska - Adrian Martinez - .9423
Penn State - Sean Clifford - .9223
Maryland - Kasim Hill - .9110
Purdue - Michael Alaimo - .9071
Minnesota - Athan Kaliakmanis - .8988
Indiana - Donaven McCulley - .8939
Michigan State - Theo Day - .8898
Rutgers - Artur Sitkowski - .8881
Iowa - Spencer Petras - .8858
Northwestern - Brendan Sullivan - .8622
Illinois - Coran Taylor - .8580
What I Find Interesting
This shakes out about how you would expect, with a few exceptions.
Higher Than Expected
The Nebraska name still does well in recruiting. They’ve been fairly consistent in their quarterback recruiting even without consistent results. Brand names, even if they’re dusty and tarnished, sill matter in football recruiting.
Maryland is a bit of a surprise. They’ve dealt with a ton of transfers, and have only recruited 3 high school quarterbacks in the last 5 seasons. This skews the results a little, but I still didn’t expect to see them in the top 4.
Lower Than Expected
Iowa is a consistent winner, but they’re not reliant on the quarterback position. It’s still surprising to see them 9th in the Big10 over the last 5 years. An Iowa team with an elite quarterback is one of the big “what if’s” in college football. You would think they could see that.
Wisconsin falls in the same category as Iowa. They’re 6th in the Big10, which is respectable, but over the last 5 years, they’re the second best team in the Big10 behind Ohio State. They did land high 4* Graham Mertz, but he’s yet to beat out the more experienced Jack Coan. It looks like Coan is the favorite to win the job again in 2020.
Transfers
The fact that Ohio State and Michigan are on top of the quarterback recruiting list isn’t surprising. What is somewhat surprising is both schools have leaned on transfer quarterbacks recently, despite their success in recruiting high school talent. Ohio State scooped up Justin Fields despite having an embarrassment of riches at the position already. Michigan went with Shea Patterson even though he never lived up to his 5* billing on the field.
The following teams could potentially start a transfer quarterback this season
Ohio State
Maryland
Purdue
Northwestern
Illinois
Rutgers
That’s quite a few programs looking outside the players they recruited out of high school for an answer at quarterback. I expect this to be the norm in college football with the suction of the transfer portal pulling in more and more players. Teams that don’t go outside the program for a starting quarterback have a solid card to play in recruiting.
Minnesota
The Gophers are the only team in the Big10 starting their lowest rated quarterback. P.J. Fleck found a diamond in the Kentucky Bluegrass and it’s paid off handsomely. The Gophers have shot up the Big10 rankings with one of the lowest rated high school quarterbacks in the league.
What It Means for Purdue
On paper, Purdue has done a solid job in recruiting quarterbacks. It’s a little deceiving though, because this is one position that has taken off in the last 2 cycles. If you throw in 4* Brady Allen in 2022, Purdue will have signed 3 straight 4* quarterbacks. Jeff Brohm’s system, tied with Purdue’s reputation as “The Cradle of Quarterbacks” has made West Lafayette a destination for prep quarterbacks, but it took a while for things to take off.
At the same point, if Austin Burton wins the job in 2020, you’ve got to consider the first three quarterback classes as misses. This is surprising considering Brohm’s reputation as a quarterback guru, but if Burton does win the job, I don’t expect quarterback transfers to be the norm at Purdue unless a 5* guy falls in their lap. They’re ordering towards the top of the quarterback menu, and that means fewer misses overall.
The goal for the Purdue program is to put together a squad that can fight for a division title, and when they win one, pull an upset with their high powered offense in the Big10 Championship game. Their recruiting at the quarterback position under Brohm is sufficient to pull that off, especially in the 2020, 2021, and 2022 classes. Quarterback is the most important position in football, and Purdue looks to be in good shape, compared to the rest of the Big10, moving forward.