Shot Down At Mackey
This is really starting to become old. With seven losses on the season now, I can pretty much list the common threads that seem to be connected in all of them and pick what excuses we'll use. They go as follows:
- Missed free throws
- Failure to rebound
- Cold stretches of 10 minutes or more
- Painter can't land the big recruit
- Painter is overpaid and should be fired
- Failure to attack the basket while settling for threes
- Defensive breakdowns at critical times
- Leaving shooters unguarded on a switch.
Tonight's game seemed to have a little bit of all of them. I've already received a number of "Painter can't recruit" and "This loss is on his coaching" comments because we should instantly give up 21 games after we all begged him to return. The final minutes we took three three-pointers (where we struggled all night) instead of driving to the basket. Some will blame Painter, but it is far from his fault that the team stands around and settles for threes on offense when everyone can hear Painter screaming, "MOVE, MOVE, MOVE" for the entire first half what is he supposed to do? Is he supposed to go out there and shove them around the court.
The other side of the coin is that Michigan did everything it needed to do to pull out a win. Jordan Morgan was the difference maker for them even though we played well on Trey Burke, and Tim Hardaway Jr. was unstoppable at the end. they definitely earned this one, especially after they responded to out big second half run. I tip my cap to them.
Admittedly, it is very hard to look at this game objectively right now. It's not because we lost, either. It is because of the number of people that are giving up and settling for the NIT when we still have 10 damn games left to play.
Yes, it is not going to be easy, but there is a ton of basketball left to play. I've seen enough to know we're at least going to have a chance in every game, but unfortunately, we just don't put it together.
I think I will leave the rest until tomorrow because honestly, this game completely drained me. This sucks right now, but we can't quit and resign ourselves to the NIT. If you want to give up on this team, fine. The real fans will stay on board.
Tomorrow I'll try to take a wider look at the season so far and evaluate the rest of the year, but the remainder of our home games, plus the trip to Northwestern, are now must win. In the meantime, use a finishline coupon for purchases.
251 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Some of the fans on these boards make me sick.
by Jackson Brunner on Jan 24, 2012 9:45 PM EST reply actions
i like how posters on this site
Can’t speak their mind now without being labeled as a complainer, etc. I could sit here and say the opposite about people who are complete cheerleaders no matter how bad the team plays. Most people on here are REALISTIC, so when the team plays inconsistant each game, opinions are going to be less than upbeat. Posters shouldn’t have to feel like they have to be all cheery or adjust what they were going to say because they will get ridiculed by Jackson Brunner. How about if you think there is too much negativity, you just don’t read it. The majority of the users here are fine with comments posted.
by TheBox on Jan 24, 2012 11:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I think there is a subtle difference
I understand those that are realistic. That’s fine. it is a frustrating time right now because we have seen what this team can do when everything is clicking. I think Jackson is referring to those that have already given up for the NIT, say Painter can’t recruit, and say that he is overpaid and we’ll never make a Final Four.
The truth is Painter would already have a Final Four and maybe a title if not for Rob’s injury. Recruiting is going well. We’re just in a down cycle, which happens.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Fans can't "give up."
We can only lower our expectations (Joe Tiller would love it!). We are spectators.
I don’t think we are competing for the regular season conference title this season, which is what I care about most. They could certainly eke into the tournament as a bubble team. I don’t get particularly excited about that, I’d like them to be in, but with this team, even if everything goes right, I can’t imagine more than two wins.
You can say that this team isn’t particularly good without saying that Painter can’t recruit, is overpaid, and won’t take us to a Final Four, but it’s hard to deny that this team’s lack of success mirrors Painter’s recruiting shortcomings, getting basically one player since 2007 that’s good enough to carry a real load on a good team.
The certainty of the team’s tournament success if Hummel had not been injured is over the top. The tournament just doesn’t work that way. I’m guessing we were all certain that last year’s team would get out of the second round, too.
by Ray Williams? on Jan 25, 2012 9:54 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
well put
some talk about the FF that never was like is was guaranteed or something, I remember Tmill stating we had a FF or NC “stolen” from us at Minny with Hummel’s injury……stolen is a strong word for a team that was rolling in early FEBRUARY.
If it happened in the tourny in the 3rd round, I could see that term being used
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions
It was stolen
You’ll never be able to convince me otherwise. That team was playing too well, and we got punished by dropping from a sure No. 1 seed to a No. 4 seed.
Sorry, but that’s just how it is. If Hummel is healthy, we’re playing in Indianapolis. And it wasn’t early February. the injury happened on February 24th with 3 Big Ten games after it.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
by BoilerTMill on Jan 25, 2012 11:05 AM EST up reply actions
I don't even like to talk about it
and I wouldn’t personally use the word stolen but I would say there is a very good chance with that #1 seed and they way we were rolling that we would have been in the FF. The sooner we can all stop talking about what ifs the better though.
Do you think Northwestern fans say what if John Shurna didn’t quit early? We so would have finally made the tournament.
I can't agree more
I’ve even had multiple non-Purdue people say the exact same thing. If Hummel doesn’t go down, Indy is all but guaranteed and depending on how things shake out, we’re talking NC. Luck is a HUUUUUUUUUUUGE factor in winning a NC….I don’t care what anyone says. Proof? If anyone besides Butler is in the NC game last year, UConn is not your defending national champ this year. UConn had a TERRIBLE game…just so happened that Butler had a worse one…
by One of these days on Jan 25, 2012 11:48 AM EST up reply actions
"It's the wisest man who knows the exact outcomes of hypothetical situations that can never actually happen."
That’s how that saying goes, right?
by Ray Williams? on Jan 25, 2012 1:46 PM EST up reply actions
Dont know how you can say that....
about a team that hasn’t even made the Elite 8.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Don't confuse me and TMill
He put his blinder on and insist we would be FF or NC if Hummel didn’t tear his ACL. I put us an 75% of making to FF if Hummel was healthy, but I wouldn’t call it stolen. It was definitely VERY unfortunate though and many of us are still (understandably) upset.
It's not resigning ourselves to the NIT
It’s looking at the facts. If it looks like a NIT team and it smells like a NIT team, its a NIT team.
That’s what we are. Our two best players are hobbled and can’t practice. Robbie is trying to shoulder the load when that was never his strong suit.
It’s the acceptance that this is a down year. It’s not giving up. Admitting your team doesn’t have it doesn’t make you less of a fan. that argument pisses me off.
Football recruiting guy for Hammer and Rails
Lead blogger for 5 other sites.
Follow the Twitter for all the details
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Riles23
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Big10RantPurdue
by HawkeyeBoiler on Jan 24, 2012 9:45 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
It's also far too early to reach that conclusion.
We’re only 8 games into an 18 game B1G schedule.
by Jackson Brunner on Jan 24, 2012 9:47 PM EST up reply actions
It isn't "far too early"
A little too early yes, but not far too early. This team doesn’t have enough quality wins to upset the bad losses.
Steal one at NW
and things will swing back in our favor.
by Jackson Brunner on Jan 24, 2012 9:50 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sorry
North Western is not a that big of a win. A win over a ranked Michigan team would have been very helpful to our resume. A NW win is not nearly as helpful.
any win is a big win right now
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Forget about the committee
As Painter always preach, focus on what you can control. We can’t f*cking control how the committee selects. All we can is to focus on our next opponent, and get one W at a time.
Ummmm
Yeah it is. Would you rather we lose that game?
by Jackson Brunner on Jan 24, 2012 9:54 PM EST up reply actions
I would prefer we win obviously.
But beating NW isn’t suddenly going to improve our resume enough to feel confidant in getting a tourney bid. The committee looks at two main things for bubble teams. SOS and record vs top 50 opponents. We are lacking in both.
It isn't, but again, forget about the committee
We have no control what the committee does. All we can do is to try to get as many Ws as we can.
by charlespig on Jan 24, 2012 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Straw man
Your criticism of anyone who says anything realistic or slightly negative is really annoying
He is being realistic.
There is a big difference between the two.
Don't worry about chops1221
He’s the genius who said Wisky is a “bad” team and by “bad” he means teams that going to NIT. When I challenged him to have a bet, he is like a chicken and won’t back up his words. I even let him go easy and just asked him to admit his mistakes if Wisky made it to the Tourney, and all he did was keep looking for excuses. He is just a clueless big mouth with no balls.
You were right about Wisky
Or so it looks now. I had the wrong team going to the NIT from that game.
Also, kindly fuck off with the personal attacks.
awsome!
there are those who have giant fan blinders on and NEVER take them off to see reality
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
Thank you for another example
None of my “attacks” involve the f-word. Looking back, I repeatedly thank you for being a great example.
I know dude
you are always clean and I respect that
I’m just enjoying the back and forth amongst fans…
but c’mon, you have to admit you do wear some blinders 95% of the time…..and you know, thats ok too….personally I just can’t wear them myself
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Thx dude
First of all, there are some rules I go by: criticizing players, yes; throwing them under the bus (e.g. calling them to transfer), no. Criticizing other fans’ opinion, yes; using the f-word on them, no. Not everyone has to follow the same rule. It’s just for me.
Second, I love arguing with other fans (esp. IU ones). Just passionately argue and have the balls to stand up to what you believe. I don’t argue at home; I don’t argue at work, so this is the place where I can really pick up some good fights and have fun. It’s my guilty pleasure to point out the emperor has no clothes.
Now, as for me putting up the blinders, that I really don’t think so, although I am fully aware that if I REALLY have put the blinders on I wouldn’t be able to see it myself. So why don’t you give me an example or two why you think I have blinders on? (I’m pretty sure you’ll hear rebuttals from me, but you know that they are good-nature and I always appreciate others pointing out my short-comings coz I usually can’t see them myself. Seriously.)
OK, seriously
Everyone needs to stop attacking people here. It’s just getting ridiculous….
by One of these days on Jan 25, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
NCAA tournament teams win this one, BUT, and Xavier
We didnt. Those were the shots at crucial wins and we came up empty. We simply don’t have the horses this year.
Football recruiting guy for Hammer and Rails
Lead blogger for 5 other sites.
Follow the Twitter for all the details
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Riles23
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Big10RantPurdue
by HawkeyeBoiler on Jan 24, 2012 9:49 PM EST up reply actions
But...
We already know who this team is! We’ve seen it over and over (unfortunately). If Hummel’s knees were OK and Lewjack wasn’t in pain all of the time it would be a different story.
Rec'ed
Just because someone is realistic instead of optimistic doesn’t make you less of a fan. This team just isn’t strong enough to make NCAA without a big comeback and stealing some wins we shouldn’t get
by AustinP0027 on Jan 24, 2012 10:14 PM EST up reply actions
I think the fans are spoiled and are sounding like IU fans
We think we are entitled to 25 win seasons, BIG ten championships, Sweet 16 each and every year. Who cares we essentially lost 2 NBA players who were 4 year starters and had the greatest number of wins of any player in school history!
Hawkeye is correct that you need to match expectations with what you see. Our Big 10 record is 4-4. We are a midpack team in the Big 10, borderline capable of making the “Big Dance”.
Team is trying, Matt is doing his best. These are not 4 star recruits on the team. It is a bunch of NR, 2 and 3 stars guys that should be roll players. Not starting. Painter can recruit. He has 2 SOLID classes coming in back to back for the first time. I am excited for the future!!!
Honestly, we are really lacking in the post and that is the main issue.
That is the primary reason we have lost some of these games and what was the one issue we had no answer for going into this off-season. Carrol has improved, but he is no JJ. I don’t even think he is half of what JJ was last year.
Maybe you can put it on Painter, or maybe on the players, or on recruiting, or whatever. But that is the one area that this team simply can’t fix this year. We knew this was going to be a down year, and I actually think it is somewhat of a good sign that we have such high expectations of the basketball program now,
I like tmill that you are optimistic but these games at home need 2 be wins. Honestly are you that confident that we can win games on the road in the big ten. Our easiest games on the road are over. The one we have a shot at is northwestern. Then you ask yourself look at msu…they lost there. I’m not giving up cause anything can happen but we live and die on the three and frankly were not that good at that. Were not 2005 Illinois that shot almost 50 threes against zona in the elite eight and one. We need 2 get in the paint and I only believe in lewjack doing that consistently. I’ll never stop believing but games at home need 2 be wins.
by dgconroy on Jan 24, 2012 9:51 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I deifnitely think we can get one more on the road
NW and Illinois aren’t overly daunting and Indiana doesn’t play defense.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I'm sorry, but there is no way we win at IU this year
And what does it matter if “Indiana doesn’t play defense” (which isn’t true)? Our shooters can’t shoot!
At IU will be extremely tough this year
If there’s a way we win it’s with Robbie catching fire like he did two years ago.
Thank you for an example of a loser's mentality
I understand that it isn’t easy to win at IU this year, as O$U and UK have demonstrated. I give us maybe a 20% chance. If I have to place money, I probably bet IU win at Bloomington.
But language like “there is no way we win” is just a perfect display of loser’s mentality. If Minnesota has that attitude going into Ass Hall when they were at the bottom of the league, they would have lost the game easily. If FSU players said, “There is no way to win at Duke”, there would be no upset.
I understand “realistically” it is not likely, but definitive statement like “no way we win” just reflects the person’s ignorance (as if there is no upsets in bball), arrogance (as if you know it all), and simply, a loser’s mentality. Thank you for demonstrating for us a wonderful example.
I think your taking it too personally.
If the team continues to play this way, it’ll be the NIT. Our lack of an inside game killed us today. When 5’-9" Lewis Jackson is the best interior scorer, that is a problem. We are so one dimensional on offence, we are easy to defend. Interior defense was terrible too. Jordan Morgan exposed it badly. Nobody here wants to settle for the NIT, but saying this team is an NCAA given is plain wrong. Going off on fans who say this is just ignorant. You always have well reasoned comments but this is just silly.
by docjay0 on Jan 25, 2012 1:12 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
What are you talking about? I didn't even bring up NIT at all
My criticism has nothing about “being negative.” I even admit it right away that if I need to back up with money I’d say we lose at IU.
For example, when you say “If the team continues to play this way, it’ll be the NIT”, I absolutely agree with it. There is nothing for me to criticize b/c it represents a very realistic view.
But statements like “there is no way we win…” is not true at all. There ARE ways we can win (for one, start making some shots like we were in Minn). And for crying out loud it’s IU, not O$U. To claim “no way we win” is not realistic at all. If the statement is true, then why play the game? As Painter (allegedly) said (to Dawson), “I don’t have to take this shit.” The “no way we win” kind of phrase reflects the speaker’s loser mentality (giving up before even fighting) and arrogance (he is soooooooooooo knowledgeable to make such a definitive claim).
I'm not just talking about this post....
…but your above ones too, which included a pretty harsh response to fan who basically said what I said above.
Let be clear
First, I think there is a big difference between what you said and what he said (see my comment titled “There is a difference” just below).
Second, I was harsh to chops1221 b/c there was a history between us since the Wisky game. He lost my respect since that game, and he keeps losing more here.
Fans argue passionately. That’s why we are fans and not just spectators. Now I’d have more respect for the fans who 1) have more educated opinion, 2) not be a bigot and thinks he knows everything, 3) own up to his mistakes when he’s wrong, 4) back up his prediction (either with facts or put money where his mouth is), or 5) have a bit of manner and not use the f-word on people.
I certainly understand you point.
Anyway, I meant no harm. I enjoy reading your comments and I think you have a reasonable and realistic outlook on Purdue sports. Keep it up my friend!
Understood, thx
And if you (or anyone for that matter) see me going cross the line, I certainly appreciate calling me out. There are two rules I live by: criticize players (esp if they don’t play well), yes; throwing them under the bus, no; arguing with fans, yes; using the f-word on them, no.
A history?
I didn’t even remember who I was arguing with until you called me clueless and a coward.
Haha
Our 5’9" player is the best interior scorer. That’s so true.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 8:44 AM EST up reply actions
Seriously charles, relax.
He’s not on the team. He’s not going to affect them in any way. He’s just stating what he thinks is going to happen. And he’s probably right.
by ScottyPods Ver2.0 on Jan 25, 2012 1:27 AM EST up reply actions
There is a difference
between “realistic pessimism” (e.g. " If I have to place money, I probably bet IU win at Bloomington") and “arrogant loser’s mentality” (e.g. there is no way we win at IU).
The former is stating what one thinks is going to happen; the latter is pouting and un-constructive.
Should have prefaced it with "If we keep playing like this"
Still, though, you’re reading way too much into what I’m saying. Also, I didn’t think I had to preface every post with ‘I THINK’ since this is an opinion-sharing site
oh and
THERE IS NO WAY WE WIN AT IU
OR NORTHWESTERN FOR THAT MATTER
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
Great, let's have a bet then
Since there is absolutely no way we win at IU (or Northwestern) this year, I’m willing to pay you $1 if we lose. (Hey, the easiest two dollars you are going to make, just by sitting and screaming THERE IS NO WAY we win)
If we win even one game though, you pay me $100. But don’t worry, there is no way we win, right?
Time to back up with up your words. This offer is open to anyone willing to make the easiest $2 in their lives.
Seriously, what's with you and backing your words?
I even offered you a “no money bet”, just to admit to the folks here that you are wrong about Wisky being a bad team destined for NIT, and amazingly you still manage to find excuses.
I have great respect for people who think differently from me, as many times they let me see things from an angle that I didn’t realize and I learn sth new. I just have no respect for those who are just talks and no substance.
Uh, charles? He admitted he was wrong about Wisky.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, and including a four-letter word to me that starts with a "F"
The principle called me into the office and let me know it was inappropriate to say some stupid things. I replied, “Fine, I am wrong to have said the stupid things. Now f*ck off.”
Nice analogy
Next time the ‘principal’ says “He is just a clueless big mouth with no balls.” in front of another ‘student’, I’ll view it as valid.
You told him he was being a know-it-all arrogant asshole because of the way he phrased his comment on the odds of us winning a particular game.
I’d have probably told you to eff off too.
Don’t take this the wrong way, I generally respect your opinion and debating style, but I think both you and chops got a little carried away in this case.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
No, check back the Wisky game thread
I won’t just call him arrogant here if not b/c of his continual behavior of making some outrageous statement as if they are definitive law and he knows it all yet refusing to back them up or even offer a sincere admittance of mistake. Sorry, these people just rub me off the wrong way (not a perfect analogy, but think Ahmadinejad on Holocaust not real, or those who claim 9/11 was fake, or to an extent, Bush on WMD).
very nice charlie
I’m normally not a betting man but……
I’ll take it!!!!!
(however it should be a wash if they split but of course there is no way that will happen haha)
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
Perfect
To be clear, the two games in question are @NW and @IU. If we lose both games, I pay $2. Just send me your paypal acct in private and I’ll send the $.
If we win even one game, you pay me $100.
Again, the offer is good to anyone who believes there is no way in hell we can win either of those two road games.
"crystal"
Lets wait on the paypal thing tho until at least the NW game….
Also to be clear, I consider this a FRIENDLY wager and all in good fun. I’m not a hater, I might get annoyed, but I don’t hate.
I will pay if the outcome is against me
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
Sure, absolutely no hate regardless of outcome
To me, it’s like two buddies going to a sports bar and have a disagreement on the game. They argue passionately why they think they are correct, and finally settle on a way to end the dispute and put money where the mouth is. Then they have a great time watching the game together. (If I lose, I’ll hate the fact that we lost, but I’ll gladly pay up and give you a big thumb up.)
Yes, so get tougher then
“Players play; tough players win”, or so said some unnamed coach who has been to six FFs in the last 15 yrs.
Let me guess...
you are just being “realistic?” NO! This is what people don’t like. You are not being realistic here, you are being submissive and conceding defeat before we even play. Be “realistic” and say “at IU is going to be one of the hardest road games of the year.” But if you honestly believe that “there is no way we win at IU this year,” then I hope you don’t even watch the game. I mean, why watch? Your team is just going to lose, right? Find a new team to give up on, Purdue doesn’t need you as a fan right now.
give me a break
my computer is slow and no one had replied to his comment while I was writing my post haha. After posting I realized how stupid it looked. Kinda funny though
Indiana's defense is nearly identical to Purdue's in nearly all advanced statistical metrics
so…..
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
no one said we played it either.
Football recruiting guy for Hammer and Rails
Lead blogger for 5 other sites.
Follow the Twitter for all the details
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Riles23
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Big10RantPurdue
by HawkeyeBoiler on Jan 24, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
They both suck. We admit it.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 24, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
*defensively
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 24, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
this is probably closer to the truth
neither team is good but you can’t say IU is shit when Purdue is the exact same.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
and likely worse
after tonight’s performance is factored in
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
I just think wininng at IU is possible, that's all
If Minnesota can do it…
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
by BoilerTMill on Jan 24, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
Minnesota can hit free throws.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 24, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
This is true
I was blinded by the last two games where we shot free throws well.
Sorry, I tend to hang on to small things, lol
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
by BoilerTMill on Jan 24, 2012 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
Purdue can,
if there is a ring around the moon and it is snowing in Hawaii
by Boiler_Ditsor on Jan 24, 2012 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
Minnesota
Has a huge front court and can hit free throws. Zeller will most likely destroy us.
More than being able to hit FTs
Purdue desperately needs a post presence. I’m sure that’s common knowledge but that doesn’t make it less true. I’m sure Hammons will help you out a lot. And man, Jackson is a beast. He has an amazingly quick first step.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 24, 2012 10:25 PM EST up reply actions
Of course its possible
But from a realistic perspective, its more likely that IU wins at Mackey than it is that Purdue wins @ IU.
Tijan Jobe graduated.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 24, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
Do you stalk H and R?
Everytime IU is mentioned you respond within the hour.
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 24, 2012 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe he has us as a favorite
There’re RSS feeds etc.
I’m glad to have someone with reasonable views on the other side.
by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 24, 2012 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
I tend to glance over threads that I think IU will get a mention
and anything that has to do with recruits. Someone has to keep you guys in line. I currently have a job that involves sitting at a computer and waiting for the government to run like a normally functioning organization. So needless to say there is a lot of waiting.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
you aren't the only ones I do this for
it’s just that IU gets mentioned here the most.
/trolling
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
You're alright with me, AJ
I appreciate your contributions. believe me, as someone who has worked crap jobs for 7 years, I know what free work time is like.
Hence the site.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Waiting for the government to run like a normally functioning organization, huh?
Keep waiting. Sorry, everyone, for getting political.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 8:48 AM EST up reply actions
the reason
We settle for 3’s is look how hard they gotta work on offensive end. The only one can get his own shot is lewjack and its a driving layup. Our 5 is only a rebounder and hummel and smith sit outside waiting to get a pass.
by clappy the clown on Jan 24, 2012 9:54 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Well
i don’t think anybody was saying that Painter couldn’t recruit or was overpaid when we went to the Sweet 16 after Hummel got injured two years ago or when we were competing for Big Ten titles year in and year out. I think in some ways he’s a victim of 1.) his own success as this year looks very bad compared to recent years and 2.) Hummel’s unfortunate injuries because we never had a chance to really see what could have happened and how that could have impacted recruiting. He has good recruiting classes coming in, so there’s still a lot of reasons to be excited for Purdue basketball in the future and there would only be a few coaches I can think of that I would rather have than Painter (and they’re not leaving their current jobs for Purdue as much as I would dream of it).
On this flip side
While I don’t at all think painter should be fired, it is his actions this year that concern me about the future of purdue basketball. Remember when purdue was that team that you could guarentee would play harder than anyone else? Not anymore. This article is accurate on the flaws game after game of this years team; however, you can’t neglect painter’s responsibility. He is the coach and he sets the tone for how his team plays. I don’t care if you have the last 5 players on the bench and we lose by 40…send a message to your starters about how you want the game played…if they won’t play that way, they don’t play! Painter used to use his bench when the baby boilers weren’t playing the way they should by putting in players like bobby buckets. It woke the stars up and made them a much better team. Painter has not demanded the type effort he used to out of his players. He doesn’t penalize for poor defense and bad turnovers. We may get a little more talent over the next few years, but last year we had 2 all americans and they still couldn’t win when it counted because of the lack of intensity and poor offensive execution down the stretch. It is not the level of talent but the level of play. Painter will be the only constant from the previous success of the baby boilers to the next few years, but until he does not allow anything less than the type of that made Purdue successful the last few years, the talent won’t mean anything!
by leviticus2213 on Jan 24, 2012 10:56 PM EST up reply actions
TC allowed their big man to get open and get easy buckets on two possessions in a row
I think he sat for the rest of the game.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
this sums it up
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 24, 2012 10:56 PM EST up reply actions
I'll refute that... it's not that Painter Can't recruit...
He tried to keep the quality going.. he just couldn’t finish… due to lack of Cache, shoddy recruiting tools etc.
2008 class -
Hummel- glad you’re walking Rob… thanks for everything … seriously
Lew-Jack got that scholly with the hope to lure Tyler Zeller to come to Purdue (wishful thinking I’m sure)… settled for …
Ryne Smith (who has been as good as expected from 3 after he decided to pull the trigger… hard worker)
John Hart was an add-in at the end because he had athleticism… in the end he’ll go down as similar to Marcus Green
Players missed- Tyler Zeller, Michael Dixon
2009 class has been disappointing… We were clamoring for D.J. Byrd to be a Kramer who can score… He played @ North Montgomery (2A bball folks)… he looked unstoppable I’m sure. Granted he’s been injured… and he’s stepping up a bit.
Bade-… oh he handled his own in the HInkle regional game…was JJ’s back-up @ Franklin Central… I’m sure he’s good. Yup…we’ll just move on
Kelsey- enigma…without a consistent pull-up game… he can’t just get his anywhere on the court… great defense though….
Marcius- Last Second recruit hoping to be more athletic than Calasan and be a force on the block… pretty much like Chris Reid at times
Players missed- Mason Plumlee (unlikely I know with big bro Miles @ Duke already… but Parents were both Purdue alum… wait for it)
2010-
Carroll- honestly I thought he played really well last year with JJ there to push him in practice. I really feel like with the lack of other post players that Carroll has regressed this year… but he’s fighting
Terone Johnson – excited about him coming out. and frankly it’s just getting in shape, free throws and finishing when he drives for him to be better… a pull up jumper would do wonders for him as well.
Player missed – (DeShaun Thomas… unlikely again… but yeah he doesn’t fit the “Purdue mold”…); Derek Elston (Painter would have had him better suited to play in B1G than Crean IMO)
2011-
Hale- N/A
Anthony Johnson- Has to get stronger… people are figuring out his floater…needs to be better from 3 and at the line
Jacob Lawson- Raw… needs to work on having ANY MOVE… and holding onto the ball… was a backup recruit due to…
Players Missed – Branden Dawson (yes Saturday still stings… I like his game though… he’d be key for Purdue right now), Chasson Randle (not that big of a loss due to our plethora of 6’2 / 6’3 guards on our team right now)
I only say this because this team had a beautiful window of an opportunity to start pumping in good recruits to bolster the Baby Boilers… and still be a legitimate threat AFTER a freak accident of an injury. (Once again see MSU after Lucas tears Achilles). Now we’re a shell of a team… and pretty much are in total rebuilding mode with a group of players who are RIGHT NOW soft and I doubt if they can lead the next group of players coming in… you know the ones that everybody seems so high on right now. Nobody on this team knows how it tastes to be 40 minutes away from a FF. Only 2 players on this team knows how it tastes to EARN a conference tournament championship. Next year the team will lose some of that culture of winning as well. I think having better talent and hungry players would have kept the culture of winning… I’m really afraid for next year when it comes to leadership
To your call once more we rally...
by H Dot Jones on Jan 24, 2012 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
minor error but Elston was 09 recruit
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 24, 2012 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
I know he's 2007
I just clumped them together since they all are graduating.. this year..
To your call once more we rally...
by H Dot Jones on Jan 24, 2012 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
It might be worth noting...
What this team would be if Hummel had graduated last year.
Yes, Purdue could of went to the Final Four which might have opened some recruiting opportunities. But think of this team now without him. It would be a world of hurt.
by docjay0 on Jan 25, 2012 1:20 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
if we go to final four, i bet we get dawson and harris imo
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 25, 2012 1:29 AM EST up reply actions
Definitely not Dawson
He committed to MSU in the fall of 2010. The team last year would have gone to FF in spring of 2011 (if Hummel is healthy and we played to our ability).
You did raise a good point though. I wonder, how much you want a guy like Dawson on your team, given that you have to take the whole package?
no I bet we would have gotten him
if the team had gone in 2010 when they were kicking ass.
idk, it would be pretty hard to pass up that kind of talent
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 25, 2012 1:32 PM EST up reply actions
can't relax
too upset/angry. I don’t know where some of you get your optimism, but I’m lacking some right now. We had one of the easiest opening schedules in the big ten and were only .500. Time for this team, coach included, to really, really bear down and get tough.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 24, 2012 9:57 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I can only speak for myself about the recruiting criticism
but 08 and 09 classes were complementary classes. We needed to potentially lure a big fish to sit behind the Big 3.
We didnt get it. Now we stuck with this. I know its hard to get top tier guys to come in and sit, but one decent post player wouldn’t have hurt. Not even good, but decent.
The recruiting left us hang this year. All about the horses and we dont have the thoroughbred to carry us.
Football recruiting guy for Hammer and Rails
Lead blogger for 5 other sites.
Follow the Twitter for all the details
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Riles23
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/Big10RantPurdue
Totally agree
The future looks great, but this year looked bad and next year will be tough with the young kids coming in.
Nothing wrong with this loss
We played a good game and lost to a better team with more talent. 7th place in the Big Ten will get in to the Big Dance and 8th is a maybe.
don't forget
To add common thread of get behind 10 to 15 pts at home in first 10 minutes
by clappy the clown on Jan 24, 2012 10:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions
The team lives and dies by Hummel
You saw what happened at the end of the first half. The half ended with a bang when he scored their last seven, and the whole team and stadium was fired up! Last game, he shot 0 for 11 and we got destroyed. He has to be more than the emotional leader this year, because we don’t have as many weapons as usual. Yes, I know his ACL injury is definitely affecting his game, but last time I checked, your ACL doesn’t make you shoot worse.
No it doesn't
But Robbie’s strength and conditioning has taken a hit. He also doesn’t have JJ, Smooge, drawing attention to let him get open. Hummel’s strength was always sliding over into a corner and knocking down shots.
Yes I agree
That’s why I think he doesn’t have enough weapons. Being the leading scorer on the team isn’t his role, but unfortunately that’s what he’s been expected to be this year.
It lives by Lew
He is the one that got us going in the 2nd half, and he made everyone much better.
He’s just hurting so bad out there though. If he was 100% things would be different.
Absolutely disagree
The team lives and dies by LewJack. When LewJack plays well, we have a chance b/c he can slice in and score. When he doesn’t play well, we don’t have a good backup PG. When Hummel didn’t play well (e.g. the Illinois game, only 5 pts), we not only win, but blew out a good team.
Last time I checked, when a player has two ACL injuries, he may have side effect like 1) not practice all the time, and thus leads to 2) poor conditioning, and thus 3) getting tired sooner and have no legs when you shoot a jumper. Apparently you don’t play basketball but only know how to give baseless criticism.
Alright fair point
I guess this comment was kind of in the heat of the moment. But still, Robbie can’t get excuses for every miscue he makes either. But with that being said, I’m not trying to start an argument, just voicing my opinion.
Long Listener First Time Caller
This is one of the deepest conferences from top to bottom that there has been in a long while. Look at the teams that have had 2 and 3 game losing streaks only to put it together and go on 2 or 3 game winning streaks. This current team certainly as its weaknesses but every team has weaknesess. It is the team that can exploit the other team’s weakness that wins. We are going to win some games and I would bet we will go on our own 2 or 3 game winning streak.
Don't be a last time caller!
I think this team’ll be up and down too…
by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 24, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
Just like we are.
It all makes sense.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 8:50 AM EST up reply actions
Some Thoughts
I want some abuse on these thoughts 1.)Keady defense—weak post D and can’t cover three. 2.) Do we miss Lusk OR new coaches not integrated yet. 3.) Rob’s help D leaves shooters open: Mich, MSU and PSU. 4.)New Mackey is not a home court advantage yet. 5.) Our 5’s need to play goaly down at the new arch. Please knowledgeable BB people correct my uninformed observations.
Some more thoughts
1.) Nothing wrong with Keady defense. It takes athletes and talent to be effective. We have a lot of holes this year.
2.) Coahing staff is solid. Wouldn’t trade them for any other staff.
3.) We have too many players that don’t have the lateral quickness to front the screens resulting in a lot of help leaving someone open…. hence back to my comment in #1.
4.) Mackey is still Mackey.
5.) We don’t have any “5’s”.
Most teams run a high on the ball screen with their bigs which means our big has to hedge on the ball handler. When the big rolls to the basket or slips the screen for a jumper (Wisconsin) it is imperative that the weakside help the big. You will see Rob do this more than anybody. I actually think you see Rob do this more than he should have to, but he is doing it because somebody is not anticipating where they should be. I think Rob hides a lot of our team defensive mistakes, but wihtout proper rotation it appears as though Rob has left an open shooter. TC’s post defense has not been bad when you look at the job he did against Meyers Leonard and MSU. I also thought he played good defensively against Minnesota.
by BQuietHiatt on Jan 24, 2012 10:18 PM EST up reply actions
This.
wihtout proper rotation it appears as though Rob has left an open shooter.
We’re not “helping the helper” so the kickout/cut to the basket to the help man’s man is open.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 24, 2012 10:21 PM EST up reply actions
problem is
our weakside help is usually a 6’2" guard leaving the forward/post with a big advantage
An counter-argument for 3)
I am not saying you are wrong, coz in a way we’ve been burned enough times that maybe it is a flawed strategy, but the rationale of doing this is to play by the percentage. We always tend to leave their big guy for open 3s, and that is not necessarily a bad idea given most of them don’t shoot the 3s well. In a way, it’s like we dare him to shoot (e.g. the other team leaving TC open when he shoots a 3, or Barlow, or AJ, you get the idea). This is a gamble, which just straightly looking at numbers it actually makes sense. Problem is, those guys are hitting their open 3s (e.g. PSU, Wisky…), and hence your observation. I have mixed feeling for this. As a numbers person, the approach makes sense; but looking at the results, it seems always a bad idea to leave guys wide open.
I think this is one of the things that people mean when they talk about Painter not adjusting when he needs to.
Yes, a for a normal big like Sandi, leaving them to hedge or help isn’t a big deal. But when you’ve got a guy like Jon Shurna or Hummel or Nankivil/Brusewitz/big-goofy-Wisconsin-white-guy x who thrives on jumpers/3s, we still hedge and help off them….hence the BOMAFUWFWLOFST.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
I think spot on
Hummel hasnt been able to guard anyone for much of the season ( a few exceptions), he’s just not the same, he wasn’t quick before injuries but was way more effective
he even admitted he missed assignment on last second Bulter shot
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
mackey is fine
Except for the dumbass recliner seats that are empty. This team has to give them something get excited about and wisconsin and michigan we are behind 10 in fist 10 minutes
by clappy the clown on Jan 24, 2012 10:15 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Some Good Thoughts
Thanks to the better informed and those that played more than pick-up.
Other Teams Working for Us
Purdue has Iowa, Minn, and Wisc working for us. Those teams can do some real winning among the othe BIG teams. The final BIG rankings will be very intteresting.
As I said before
We will win 80% at home, 50% on the road and sneak into NCAA, that’s it for this year
We are
who they said we were. Bottom line. The objective analysis is usually the accurate one.
Still ten games left
and then the B10 tourny. We can DEFINITELY still get in. Win the next three, no ones worrying. We just have to try and avoid the cold stretches. That’s what killed us tonight.
Lets worry about
winning the next 1.
The next 3 games will be brutal battles. The OSU game is not going to be a win.
Would love to win the next three
But it will be extremely difficult at OSU. The IU game won’t be easy, either. And Northwestern is, well, Northwestern.
We will be able to get some rest between IU and Northwestern, though.
Rest is critical
I think IU and both NW games are must-wins now. I have accepted OSU as a likely loss (but hey, you just never know).
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Which football team? ;-)
The ones who beat O$U at home, or the ones who got routed on the road and need the NCAA to remove that painful memory? (Oooops, unfortunately this game is on the road…)
Dackich was right...
when he said that Martin transferring hurt us…more than we realized. Everybody chill, the teams doing the best they can. If they are NIT bound so what, you’re life wont’ change. If you can’t make free throws are go to the hoop to draw a foul (cause your scared of missing free throws), you don’t deserve it. That’s the way it goes. Smith hits the 3, which he would 60% of the time, everybody would feel different, even though it doesn’t change who this team is. They’re doing their best, but who do you think they could beat in the NCAA tourney anyway. Man…I like Lewjack…wish he had one more year with two good feet.
yea, in hindsight if he had redshirted when he was a sophomore
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 24, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
Sure, if we know Hummel is gonna tear his ACL...
If you watched the Matt Painter show, LewJack chose to play that year b/c he felt he could help us get to FF. He could have taken it easy and chose to sit out. Obviously, as Painter admitted too he now wished he hadn’t after what happened, I think the emphasis though should be on appreciating the fact that LewJack willing to battle through pain to help the team.
Dackich just tries to knock Purdue/applaud IU every chance he gets
and I don’t think a freshman transferring 4 years ago has anything to do with the current struggles of the team
he's pretty tough on IU as well
I think he calls it like he sees it… but IU is IU… they are the moneymaker in the state. He’s going to talk about them more than Purdue, until Purdue does something to shut everybody up about IU and have them talk about Purdue, and by that I mean win a National Championship… so far no dice
To your call once more we rally...
by H Dot Jones on Jan 24, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
Really?
I’ve always gotten the impression that Dakich really respects Purdue’s program, especially Painter. I’ve listened to his radio show quite a few times and that’s the impression I always come away with.
by Boylemaker88 on Jan 25, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
It's not a rebuilding year
But cmon everyone knew this was going to be a transition year, you don’t lose 2 NBA players and keep on trucking unless you’re a top 10 program and objectively we aren’t. There is a bit of a gap between the baby boiler team and whatever is coming next but these guys are doing their best to hold it together and grind things out.
This year we knew that we were going to live and die by jump shooting which after having 2 NBA forwards in a row is a tough pill to swallow, especially now that it’s gone cold the past few. Hopefully it comes back at an opportune time and we can get in and make some unexpected noise in the tourney.
Tonight was a tough loss but don’t forget we had 2 IDEAL looks from 3 to take a 2 point lead with both ryne and robbie getting shots that they are capable of knocking down. They didn’t fall, you know the rest; such is life in the big ten this year, nothing is easy especially without a true post.
all those threes
at the end was pure insanity!!!!!
horrible shot selections, we only needed a two each possession in the last 2 minutes….there was no reason to ever attempt a trey
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions
I think everyone knows it's a transition year
But not making the tournament is something that most people (myself included) will find hard to swallow.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
It's tough to follow, definitely
But even UNC had to go through it just two yrs ago.
Right after their Championship.
So i’m sure the fans could muster up enough strength to endure it.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 8:54 AM EST up reply actions
No, I think that hurts even more
It’s difficult to live broke when you were a billionaire just the year before and live in those kind of lifestyle than to be broke while never making more than $25k a year.
But, I would gladly take a NC and then a visit to the NIT
Rather than 2 back to back sweet 16’s. Or 2 back to back Final Fours for that matter.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 9:01 AM EST up reply actions
As a program "on the rise"
I’d take the back to back Final Fours.
Sustained success is what will get us the attention from the media and the recruits, not a one-and-done championship like what Maryland pulled a few years back.
It’s okay for UNC to get the NC and then bring it to the NIT a year later, but that’s because it’s UNC.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
I think Painter is the answer to sustained success.
Maybe it’s just tough for me to look at those banners down here in B-town…
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 9:19 AM EST up reply actions
And by the way
Butler went to back to back title games – and they don’t get that so desired media attention?
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 9:21 AM EST up reply actions
They play in the Horizon League....it's a little different.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
Said it once, say it again.
I just don’t think this offensive gameplan clicks with this group of players. I don’t see ROLE players at each position. We don’t have an abundance of depth and balance at each spot. It’s hard to run an offense without a legit C who can back down and kick out. Ours hover around the arc and set poor screens. It’s hard when our 5’9" PG has most of our points in the paint. It’s hard when you have 4 guys under 6’5" on the floor. With those smaller players, the defensive matchups can be a nightmare. Last year we had a PG, SG, SF/PF, and a C…and backups.
….
This is a rough year and it just shows how spoiled we were the last 4.
…
Side note, was at the game tonight. Wasn’t impressed with the Paint Crew at all, nor the crowd. It seems that since we aren’t ranked, we don’t need to be loud. We only got loud when we mad a run. Barely any noise on defense except after those runs.
…
Oh well, Boiler Up! The world goes on
disagree about the Paint Crew altho I might be slightly biased.
THought it was a normal crowd that was into it throughout and got pretty loud during key stretches.
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 25, 2012 12:50 AM EST up reply actions
I mean the Paint Crew is always good. One of the best.
Maybe since I’m not in it this year like previous, its just different being on the other side.
Yeah, I've gotta disagree about the Paint Crew as well
I thought the volume was pretty typical for our B1G games, and when we got the lead for the first time, we went absolutely nuts .
I think besides losing E'twaun and J.J. losing Kramer kills us more then Martin.
I totally agree with the whole we’re not helping the helper on D and I think Kramer and then J.J. covered that up. Kramer early on b/c he would kill someone if they sucked on D or he would just steal the ball all the time and it would work. I was at the Kramer vs. Bama game and we were down by 16 at half and I left to get a drink and came back smiling. My Bama buddy who got me tickets, looks at me and says, ahh Scoreboard." My response, I have Chris Kramer, you don’t." Bama won’t win if they can’t score. :) Needless to say I was smiling when we left. I hope we learn from this year how to help the helper and step back into the team that thrives on Defense. If AJ Hammons can play good D next year we are set b/c he is just so much bigger and can clog anything up.
I really enjoyed the game and just disappointed we couldn’t pull it out. If we do go to the NIT instead of the NCAA I’ll be disappointed but come next November I’ll be thankful for more post season games. I think our guys just need experience.
I wouldn't put too much money on Hammons
He’ll be a freshman.
Bigs always have the most difficult transition to the next level and Hammons will likely be no exception to that rule.
TC’s offense is looking better and better (although he’s still a defensive liability). Lawson would be so much better if he could hold on to the freaking ball.
Regardless of Hammons’ contribution to the 5 spot, I’m thinking we’ll see much more production from our post players next year.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
Agree we shouldn't put unrealistic high hopes on Hammons
And yes, bigs have difficult transition, but all we are asking for Hammons (at least myself) is just to BRDD (block, rebound, defend, dunk). These are things he is good at already. I am not asking him to be a Shaq down low. If he can anchor our defense our team would be soooooooo much better already.
BRDD?
You mean the Dallas Lauderdale Memorial This Is All I Do award?
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
LOL
Yes, I set my expectation low for a frosh.
I'm thinking Carroll as a 4
Hammons at the 5. And Lawson on the bench… Seriously, what happened to this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49MpnWqe5D4
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 25, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions
Can Hammons shoot FTs?
I have no idea, just asking
I heard I shoot better than TJ.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 25, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
A little sleep helps me with perspective.
I’ve learned that life gets a lot better when you don’t dwell on the negative, and search for the positive, no matter how small the positives are.
My brief evaluation of the 2011/12 Boilers are that we are a jump shooting team that can play good D in spurts. That’s our identity this year. Now that we are 21 games into this season, no matter how hard the coaches try they are not going to change that team identity.
That being said, we’re only going to have a chance to win games when we shoot open jumpers and hit them. Reference our two best W’s this year – home vs. Illinois and @ Minnesota. Both games we were hotter than the sun for a good portion of the game.
We’re clearly in a cold shooting stretch right now (I haven’t scoured the stats, but that’s my feeling from watching the games). My hope is that they can shoot themselves out of the slump and play better in February. IMO, if you’re a jump shooting team, there’s going to be a cold stretch during the season at some point, and I’d rather have that cold shooting stretch come in January than in February or worse, in March.
Here’s to our Boilers heating up and turning this train around!!
Thank you
That first sentence sums up how I like to live my life and everything I’ve said has been rather negative. We all need to start being a little more positive, myself included.
I think the biggest problem with this team is that we don’t have “Do It All” guys like JJ and E’Twaun. They could score, rebound, defend, make big shots, and hit their free throws all without getting into foul trouble. Robbie used to be that type of player, but with so many injuries and so much focus from opposing defenses, it’s impossible for him to be that.
Each player has at least one critical flaw that doesn’t allow us to simply “Plug and Chug”. TJ’s free throws, TC’s defense, Lawson’s stones hands, Ryne’s perplexing inability to hit the open 3 when it’s needed, AJ’s perplexing inability to hit ANYTHING, Byrd’s dumb fouls, Barlow’s belief that the floor inside the three point arc is lava.
It all adds up, and when you think about it, you can’t really blame Painter for their record.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
I haven't read through all the comments yet....
… so if this has been mentioned/argued/debated already, let me throw something out for thought:
Is the NIT really so bad for this team? Let’s face it, we’ve lost a number of games we should have won and it frustrates all of us. Given the current resume, and assuming the current trend continues (.500 finish in B1G play), I think the NIT may be a better place for this team to actually have a decent post season run. If we make the NCAA Tournament, do you really expect this team to be able to put together a run such that we would make it out of the first weekend? Wishful thinking for sure, but honestly unlikely in my opinion.
However, an NIT bid puts us in a position to make a little post season noise and possibly have a longer run than the NCAA’s would this year as a building block for next year.
Don’t get me wrong, I would still welcome an NCAA bid; but with the team playing as it is now, I’m not sure it would necessarily be the best thing for us. I hope the team can pull it together and justifiably make an NCAA bid and run; I just don’t see this team as worthy of that at this point.
If this point has been made already – I apologize as I just felt like commenting first before reading through them all.
Be careful, you may get crucified for mentioning this
I understand your argument, and to some extent, you points are very much valid. Just that some others consider NIT as death penalty or like a plague that should be avoided at all cost.
Absolutely agree
I honestly believe this team is likely NIT bound, but I’m not calling the team a pile of shit when I say that. I would personally prefer a deep run in the NIT vs. a 1st round loss in the NCAA tournament. I know that puts me in a very small minority, but so be it. I don’t view an NIT bid as “giving up” on our team. It’s a transition year, we have to lower the bar a little bit. (Or you can keep it high, and throw stuff around your house every time we miss a key free throw). All that said, I’m gonna cheer as hard as I can for this team, if they go to the NIT, I’ll scream for an NIT championship. After the last few weeks though, I’m tempering my expectations, it takes the sting out of some of these losses.
I agree that I think this team is proabably NIT bound...
…unless they can change the focus of the offense and work on interior defense. Making it to the NIT is definitely not a death sentence. We knew this years team was going to drop this year; however, we have a solid group of guys coming in the next two years, which include a legit big man, which is most needed.
But, I would always rather have the team in the NCAA tourney. Always.
Yup
Once you get into the Tourney, anything can happen, like VCU.
Although with this team, we never seem to be able to piece together 4 good games in a row. Our record coming into the Michigan game last night was WLWLWL.
We just really love our home city
So we keep spelling out its initials on the record
LOL!!! That's a good one.
After all, so many people think we are some school in the East Coast.
That always amazed me...
I went to high school in Colorado, and the #1 question I got when I mentioned I was going to go to Purdue for college was “oh isn’t that in the Ivy League?” A little misguided mainly, but I always took it as a positive sign of how well the University is regarded the further away from Indiana you get.
I got that once...
In Vegas in a line for a club. The girl was shocked that it was a state school.
You're probably right
The NIT would be better for the players, but the NCAA Tourney would be better for the fans.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
For the underclassmen, I agree
But I really don’t want to see Hummel/LewJack/Smith end their careers in the NIT
The empty seats...
Don’t miss free throws and struggle on defense so that is a tired excuse. I think it is great that Hummel gets one last go ‘round but I think some of the other guys thought they could just contribute on the fringe because the savior was back. He’s clearly still hobbled and it is unfair that he feels the need to be THE guy. Hopefully these guys stop feeling sorry for themselves and play a tough game for a full 40 minutes soon. Believe it or not, some middling programs would love to trade places with Purdue. Trust me, I’m not trying to lower expectations but this team is not as good as the previous years and will continue to lose games we usually win unless they get it together.
by grebek on Jan 25, 2012 8:44 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
My 2 cents..it isn't worth much
We have been a up and down team all season long. It has been a very frustrating year, you can critique and be negative about your team, I am very guilty of that but you have to look at the big picture.
We have 10 games left in the season, that is 10 more games for Hummel to get back to what we all know he can do, he started to show that fire last night. 10 games for TJ to hit his free throws, Carroll to gain more confidence, Lawson to learn not to foul and etc…
We have a very tough strech coming up but i feel if we can put it together and get the team chemistry clicking we can make it in the NCAA tournament and we can surprise a few teams because everyone would be sleeping on us.
We could easily lose 6 of the next 10 games, I know that, but I can’t and won’t give up on my team.
Prediction: NW (W), IU (W), OSU (L), NW (W), ILL (W), MSU (L), NEB (W), MI (L), PSU (W), IU (L) That will be 20-11 and with a win or two in the big ten tourney we will be fine.
by BoilermakerAustin on Jan 25, 2012 8:50 AM EST reply actions
I am leaning this way as well
Bare minimum we need a split, but with the way the committee judges that last ten we would do well to go 6-4 at least.
I just can’t see them keeping out a team with 10 conference wins unless it is someone crazy like Iowa doing it.,
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Was anyone around campus in 2001-2007?
Six seasons, went to NCAA once, NIT twice (not even make it past the quarterfinals), and no post season play three times. Not saying we should accept mediocrity, not when we paid a coach $2.3M, but just to put things in a little perspective. Things rarely are as good as they seem or as bad as they seem.
I agree with charlespig
It’s a down year. These happen. I agree we’re probably an NIT team but what are ya gonna do? I’m really tired of all the people who seem to be abandoning ship on Painter. Give me a break! 9 months ago, we were all on our knees begging him to come back and now you want to run him out?
All the same, no excuse for a starting guard to shoot 34% FT’s (glances at TJ) and there have been far too many scoring droughts for looooooong periods of time this year. Last night, I heard Tirico say we didn’t get a bucket in the final 4+ minutes…at that time you need FT’s to carry you. You fix that drought and the ones vs Butler and XU alone and we’re a tourney team.
It may not happen this year, but Purdue basketball will be back. BOILER UP
by One of these days on Jan 25, 2012 9:21 AM EST reply actions
I agree with this post
This year and next year have and will be dissapointing for Purdue standards however we have two outstanding classes coming in which means we will be competing with Mich, MSU, OSU and dare I say it IU for B1G supremacy in a couple years. We just have to realize that this is not our year and next year may be a struggle as well but we will be back. Hang in Boiler Nation.
From here in
In the ten remaining games, we have two “sure” wins (Neb., PSU) and two “sure” losses (at OSU, at IU). The remaining six games (three each at home and away) are likely to go 2-4, 3-3 or 4-2. In all likelihood, this will include one unexpected road win (such as at IL or at MI) and one frustrating home loss (such as NW or MSU). In spite of LewJack, Robbie, Ryno and DJ, the team plays like a team of freshmen and sophomores; an inconsistent mix of incredibly good mixed with excretably bad (sometimes, such as Xavier, in the same game). End result: 8-10 and first round loss in B1G tourney probably leads to a 4 or 5 seed in the NIT; most likely scenario of 9-9 and loss in quarters (second round) of B1G tourney puts the Boilers SQUARELY on the bubble and may create sleepless nights between the B1G tourney and Selection Sunday; best case of 10-8 and B1G championship puts the Boilers in the NCAA at about a 6 or 7 seed. Right now, I am thinking that going to NIT and not making round of eight is somewhat disastrous; in the NCAA, making it to the first weekend (Sat/Sun) would be happy time and Sweet 16 is the absolute upper range of my hopes.
by Danwesley Meyer on Jan 25, 2012 9:34 AM EST reply actions
substitutions last night
I’m kind of surprised nobody has mentioned this yet. I thought CMP’s substitution patterns last night were a little strange. Seemed like a few times when guys got a little hot or made a great play they would be subbed out. I remember TJ hitting a three and stealing the ball on nearly consecutive possessions in the first half and he was taken out, Lewjack had a series of insanely tight D then out, AJ had a little run then out… just kinda strange, anyone else pickup on this?
Also, why on earth is TJ in at the end of a close game that we need FT’s???? in a game like last night he has to be off the floor in the last two minutes, no excuse for this. He wasn’t lighting up the world, his D is no better than Byrd or Barlow… what gives?
by BoilerGOZ on Jan 25, 2012 9:54 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
agreed
I agree with the substitution. AJ was playing a lot better than Terone or Ryne yet he sat for the last 5 minutes of the game. TJ defense is a lot better than Byrd’s defense on the perimeter and Barlow was sick which is why he was limited to 9 minutes of action. Lew Jack would not have been so worn out at the end if Barlow could have played more and guarded Tre Burke more than he did.
No leadership, no coaching, no soul, and no fire
When a team losses a close game, it is the coaching. Why we’re shooting 3s? Why everyone just stood there while defending? Where was the draw up play after the timeout?
When a team losses a big lead and losses, it is the coaching. Xavier game period. The coach is not preparing them well. In this case, we can also blame it on senior leadership.
And then, we have Hummel who becomes a jump shooter. A BAD jump shooter. Did he try to save himself for NBA? If he plays like this for the rest of the season, there is no NBA.
No leadership, no coaching, no soul, and no fire get us here.
My god
You can preach to people what they should do all you want, but ultimately it is the players who have to perform on the court not Painter. This team is full of role players who are expected to take all the work load now. That doesn’t work well. They are not use to being the one who has to guard the team’s best player or having to be the ones to shoulder the offensive load.
And Hummel was never the primary scorer kind of guy. But because of the current way the rest of the team is playing he has to.
It is a down year, chill out.
Oh Barlow was sick?
I thought he was in trouble again. Well, at least he can recover from sickness, but it’ll be a bigger deal if he gets suspended.
I thought AJ should of been in the game at the end
by BoilermakerAustin on Jan 25, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
AJ is not a great FT shooter either
…but yeah, I am not sure if I am comfortable with TJ late in the game. If I were Michigan and I’m down I would intentionally foul him.
end of game, if winning...
Should be Lewjack, Ryne, Byrd/Barlow, Hummel, Tacos. If down remove Tacos for either Byrd or Barlow, IMO.
by BoilerGOZ on Jan 25, 2012 10:56 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Travis Carroll
Someone on GBI posted using their phone and it autocorrected Travis to Tacos. The name stuck apparently.
CMP has been doing that since he started coaching here.
I’ve never been able to figure it out, but I can remember seeing it with JJ and E’twaun as well. I trust CMP though. IMO I think CMP was showing TJ that he had confidence in him. I don’t think we’ll see him in at the end of a game again.
We aren't utilizing Lawson
Our slow ass offense isn’t going to bring out his talents. He is a run up and down type player, not this swing it around the arc bs.
He has to utilize his hands first.
That dude is the Pierre Garcon of college basketball. Cant remember the last time he caught a pass cleanly. Great athlete, can’t wait to see what Painter does with him, he just isn’t going to be a difference maker this year aside from some good blocks, as we saw last night.
aside from that one catch he let go out of bounds
he had a pretty good stat line.
in 12 min. he got a bucket, 3 boards, 2 blocks and ZERO fouls
The stat line is fine..
I loved his blocks, if he blocks out he’s got a couple more boards, ZERO fouls in 12 min. is terrific! To be honest, his one bucket should’ve been a charge (he looked more like a running back than anything.)
No leadership, no coaching, no soul, and no fire
We are in troubles.
chill out
We’re 4-4 and on a bad shooting spree. Hummel showed some life (although i’d rather not look on 6-14 as a “good night”) and Smith had three of his misses bounce on the rim numerous times. We had open looks to win at the end and they didn’t fall. MIchigan is a good team and we played them tight, came back to have a shot at the end. This is not the end of the world!
relax
Games are tough in the big ten this year, we fought hard and had good looks at the end to win.
Did we win, no. I’m not a moral victory guy by any means, but there’s a difference between being happy you lost by 2 (I am not) and using this as a launching point to go forward which you have to do.
We played a decent game, not great by any means but not bad, and definitely not worth writing off the season over.
Also I think it’s pretty obvious that the guys are playing hard and doing what they can, Lew is doing things that 99% of people would be crying about, Robbie is in a ton of pain, and look at how far Carrol has come. Say this team is less talented all you want, but don’t call out their heart, that is just flat out disrespectful.
Wow
Hope we never have to share a foxhole, buddy……
by One of these days on Jan 25, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
Do we need to switch up the offense?
This team seems to score better in transition then when we slow it down and run the motion. It’s geared to be able to read the defense and react. Since we don’t have a big man, we tend to play high and settle for outside shots. Very rarely is there a successful backdoor cut to the basket that leads to points. I guess when the team shoots well from the perimeter, then all is well, but you have to be shooting better than 65% it seems to be able to win. Any thoughts?
Full court press
That will 1) make use of our excess of small guards, 2) create easy baskets, and 3) mask our deficiency inside. (Tubby Smith is best known for using press in our league)
We are not, coz we never practice at it
But that’s what we should do to make use of our deep bench. Guys like John Hart and Lawson sit on the bench when they could be using their limited minutes and energy to hound the opposing team.
we dont have the stamina for the press
do we??
having a hard enough time in the regular defensive schemes
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
Not a 40-minute press
Just throw it out at certain times, and you only need certain players. Guys like Hart and Lawson has more than enough stamina when they play less than 12 minutes a game.
I think we're certainly athletic enough...
I guess I’d rather try it on someone like a Nebraska first to see how we play it. Then if we get burned by it, we’ve got a reasonable expectation of coming back the remainder of the game.
dont have the athletes imo
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jan 25, 2012 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
we have huge depth
which can replace that in a press
I tend to agree here...
Other teams are eating us up with a high pick n’ roll and their big man is usually open, while ours is almost never open on the same play. Our big men are very lacking and that makes it tough to play in a motion offense. I’d love to see us run the court more, but good luck switching strategies mid-B1G season.
Yeah, on defense...
…when the other team has an aggressive big guy, I think we need to look at using a 2-3 zone to keep the ball outside. Although Michigan was killing us inside and outside, I don’t think anything would have worked except for being in their face more.
so so true
transition has disappeared as of late
by Boilerhoosier91 on Jan 25, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
Worry about the future
Even though this year has been down compared to the past, the future is very bright for Purdue. When you go from having two stars almost running your whole offense to a team where there isnt really a true scorer you wont be as productive on offense. Since everything ran threw Moore and JJ it hurt people like TJ, Barlow, and Smith because they got most of their scoring from JJ and Moore so them trying to create their own shot is hard cause they arent used to that. Even though they have had games where they played to their best ability. Also look at the recruiting classes that are coming in 2012 we have scorers and with Ronnie Johnson coming I think maybe he can help his brother out, Hammons will actually give us a low post presence. 2013 We have 2 of the 3 best recruits out of Indiana according to ESPN and in 2014 it looks like Painter is going to try hard to get good recruits. And this year people have to see that we dont have the players that can create their own shot whenever they want. And people who keep on saying that we should of never gave Painter that contract are wrong for many reasons.
1. Who would of we have gotten that is as good of coach as he is.
2. We have to look in the future with the 7 recruits coming in we will be deeper than we have and have more talent.
3. If Painter left we would of never got Hammons and most likely had some recruits decommit.
4. We need more players that fit into Painter system of defense.
I know its hard to see Purdue play like this but just get over it that we wont be like some of the teams in the past and look to the future cause it looks very bright at the end of the tunnel.

















