Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

In Need Of Mackey Magic: Purdue Hosts Michigan

Home court cures all. In this conference defending your home court regardless of opponent is imperative. For example: If we beat Wisconsin, we're tied for first place in the Big Ten right now. We can't get that game back, but tonight we face the Michigan Wolverines with a chance to get a much needed quality win.

As noted in yesterday's non-conference update, we're 3-4 against the RPI top 50. That changed slightly this morning as Minnesota is now into the top 50 (giving us an all-important true road win against a top 50 foe), but Iona fell to 52 after blowing a double-digit second half lead and losing to Siena. They're now 52, and probably need to go unbeaten the rest of the way to have any chance at an at large bid.

But tonight is all about Michigan. They are No. 28 in the RPI, No. 20/22 in the polls, and they are another team coming in off of a loss. This is a team that can make a comeback, as they trailed by 20 at Arkansas on Sunday. They came back to lose by only two. Iowa and Indiana have gotten them in league play, making them 0-2 on the road but 5-0 at home. Duke and Virginia also got them in the non-conference.

2010-11 Record: 21-14-9-9 Big Ten (Lost to Duke 73-71 in NCAA Tournament Round 2)

2011-12 Record: 15-5, 5-2 Big Ten

Blog Representation: MGoBlog, Maize'n'Brew, Maize & Blue Nation, UM Hoops

Series with Purdue: Purdue leads 82-61

Last Purdue win: 12/28/10 80-57 in Ann Arbor

Last Michigan win: 2/26/09 87-78 in Ann Arbor

Time & TV 7pm on ESPN

Star-divide


FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
G M M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF PPG
Tim Hardaway Jr 20 33.1 5.2 12.3 42.4 1.6 5.7 27.4 3.1 4.2 73.8 0.7 3.0 3.6 2.5 1.7 0.5 0.2 2.1 15.1
Trey Burke 20 34.7 5.3 12.1 43.6 1.6 4.7 34.0 2.5 3.4 73.1 0.8 3.0 3.8 4.9 2.6 0.8 0.4 1.6 14.6
Zack Novak 20 33.4 3.6 7.1 50.4 1.6 4.0 40.5 1.0 1.2 83.3 1.2 3.5 4.6 2.0 1.0 0.8 0.1 2.4 9.7
Evan Smotrycz 20 23.6 3.0 6.4 46.9 1.4 3.1 43.5 1.5 2.1 73.2 1.8 4.2 5.9 1.1 1.7 1.0 0.5 2.8 8.9
Stu Douglass 20 26.8 2.5 6.2 39.5 1.4 4.3 32.6 1.1 1.4 81.5 0.4 2.3 2.6 1.9 1.1 0.8 0.1 1.9 7.4
Jordan Morgan 20 23.7 3.3 5.1 64.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.8 45.7 2.3 3.3 5.6 0.2 1.8 0.6 0.5 2.4 7.4
Jon Horford 9 10.8 1.0 1.9 52.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 85.7 1.4 2.1 3.6 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.0 1.1 2.7
Matt Vogrich 20 10.8 0.8 2.3 32.6 0.4 1.6 22.6 0.1 0.2 50.0 0.4 1.0 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.8 2.0
Eso Akunne 11 4.2 0.6 0.7 87.5 0.4 0.5 80.0 0.2 0.2 100.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.8
Blake McLimans 19 4.6 0.4 0.8 53.3 0.2 0.3 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.0
Carlton Brundidge 10 3.6 0.1 0.4 25.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.8 50.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6
Colton Christian 10 2.8 0.2 0.6 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.4
Josh Bartelstein 6 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0
Corey Person 5 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0

Because of a weird quirk in the scheduling we did not play Michigan during the 2011 calendar year. We only played them once last season, on December 28th to kick off the Big Ten in Ann Arbor with a 23 point win. 25 Big Ten games later they come back on the schedule. It just seems odd that we have played Michigan State and Iowa four times each since the last time we played Michigan.

This is a hard team to figure out too. Their record at home is spotless. Away from Ann Arbor they are only 3-5, with two wins coming in Maui and the third coming at Oakland. They've also had to survive Northwestern and Michigan State in their last two home games, so it is not like they are ripping of heads to assert dominance or anything.

One stat that sticks out to me is rebounding. Michigan State is one of the best rebounding teams in the country and we were able to hold our own (partially because they couldn't miss). Michigan is 258th nationally in rebounding at 33.1 per game. Evan Smotrycz is their leading rebounder at 5.9 per game with Jordan Morgan next at 5.6.

The two main scorers are Tim Hardaway Jr. (15.1 ppg) and Trey Burke (14.6 ppg). Burke is the leading candidate to usurp Cody Zeller as Big Ten Freshman of the Year, and if he stays, he will likely dominate this league. He averages almost five assists per game. He hits 34% of his three pointers and shoots 43.6% from the field.

Burke's ability to run the point allows Hardaway to be more creative and get to the basket. Hardaway only shoots 27% from long range, but he is adept at driving and getting to the line. As a whole, Michigan hits its free throws at a 70% clip, and they shoot fairly well from the field at 46%. Their three-point shooting isn't great at 34.3%, but Zach Novak and Smotrycz will be the leading nominees for the Billy Oliver Memorial Award For Unguarded White Forwards We Leave Open For Seven Threes (going forward, the BOMAFUWFWLOFST). they shoot better than 40% from long range. As always, never leave the white guy open behind the arc.

Michigan is a team contending for the Big Ten because they have a nice core of savvy veterans in a year where many teams in the conference lost a ton of upper class leadership. Guys like Stu Douglass, Matt Vogrich, and Novak have been around for awhile.

In a way, our success next season banks a lot on D.J. Byrd, John Hart, and Kelsey Barlow playing similar roles next year. They will be our seniors in 2012-13, but much of the attention will be on the incoming freshmen. Douglass, Novak, and Vogrich aren't their leading scorers in favor of younger guys like Hardaway and Burke, but they play critical support roles. Next year we may see Ronnie Johnson and Raphael Davis become primary scorers with Jay Simpson and A.J. Hammons trying to assert themselves inside. We'll still need Byrd doing good Byrd things (like he was earlier in the Big Ten season), Barlow to attack, and Hart to hit some big baskets.

One thing I would like to see us do is make an effort to get Sandi Marcius and Travis Carroll involved more offensively. Carroll lately has been doing an excellent job of rotating to the basket off of screens, but we're not finding him for open look. Marcius has been establishing his position as well, but aside from a few random moments, they aren't getting the ball on offense less than 20 feet from the basket. If Carroll is rotating open off the screen, hit him with the pass until the defense respects it.

Of course, the one thing I haven't addressed yet is the abysmal shooting from the Michigan State game. Let's face it: aside from Barlow, Lewis Jackson, and Terone Johnson, we're a jump shooting team. If they are falling, we look good. If Robbie Hummel is 0 for 926,012,965 (approximate) we're not going to look good. Rob looked awful on Saturday and dejected as a whole.

Saturday was the first time I saw Rob actually look bitter about his injuries. I am hoping that an energized crowd today rejuvenates him because we haven't seen a Rob the Conqueror type of performance yet this year. His shot needs to start falling to the point where the bowing in adoration is accompanied by shouts of "EL CONQUISTIDOR!".

Tonight our defensive effort has to be focused on everyone. With six players averaging between seven and 15 points they can score from just about anywhere. Outside of Jon Horford they don't have a massive size edge, so it comes down to effort on the glass, solid defense, and hitting our own shots. We had those in the first 15 minutes against Michigan State, but it all fell apart because we couldn't shoot. If we keep up that effort and find our shooting touch again we can pull off the upset tonight.

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Hammer and Rails

Robbie Hummel VS. The NBA Draft

May 2012 by Slandrey - 25 comments

Boilermakings For 4/30

Apr 2012 by BoilerTMill - 2 comments

More On The John Hart Transfer

Apr 2012 by BoilerTMill - 25 comments

Comments

Display:

I've always thought Michigan was overrated this year....

and getting too much credit for playing Duke tough in the tourney last March. Efficiency stats bear that out. Michigan is #39 per KenPom whereas Purdue is #37.

37) Purdue B10 14-6 .8500 110.9 37 93.6 58
39) Michigan B10 15-5 .8453 111.4 33 94.4 66

http://kenpom.com/

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Jan 24, 2012 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

ESPN Insider has us winning by 8

with over 10,000 simulations to arrive at that.

by Boiler00 on Jan 24, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

kenpom

has Purdue as a 6 point favorite

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Jan 24, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Awesome
Smotrycz will be the leading nominees for the Billy Oliver Memorial Award For Unguarded White Forwards We Leave Open For Seven Threes (going forward, the BOMAFUWFWLOFST).

And Oliver took over for Keaton Nankinvil, right?

by Boiler00 on Jan 24, 2012 10:54 AM EST reply actions  

Exactly

the most stunning winner ever of the BOMAFUWFWLOFST would be Tom Pritchard.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 24, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

ugh

better not happen again and we better hold Roth down as well.

by Boiler00 on Jan 24, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

How did MSU shooting well help our rebounding? It’s easier to get defensive rebounds. We were giving them plenty of defensive rebounding oppurtunities and they were giving us very little oppurtunities for them. The shooting woes by us, and shooting hotness by them made the rebound push even more impressive in my mind.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 11:35 AM EST reply actions  

It helped us because they weren't missing

That means fewer rebounds for them to grab.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 24, 2012 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok, both teams get about 2:1 defensive rebounds to offensive rebounds. 20 missed MSU shots means Purdue gets 20 chances at the higher percentage defensive rebound. 44 missed Purdue shots means 44 chances for MSU at the higher percentage defensive rebound. MSU had more chances at defensive rebounds. That shouldn’t be hard to understand.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Certainly less opportunity

for MSU offensive rebounds, where they are dominant.

Lots of bricks on our end……..LOTS of LONG rebounds.

by Bobobi on Jan 24, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok.

Trying to make this clearer. MSU usually gets 39% of offensive boards. Versus us they got 27%. MSU usually gets 72% of defensive boards. Versus us they got 60%. It’s pretty clear we had a good rebounding game on both ends of the floor and it had nothing to do with us missing shots helping us out.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

it really is very simple

had they missed more shots chances are we would have secured more of those rebounds than them, hence the 27% they did get offensively. That translates to us getting 73% of their misses.

by Boiler00 on Jan 24, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

It’s annoying when people want to explain away our bright spots simply because they don’t want there to be any in a blowout loss.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

MSU lost the first half in rebounding 20-12. That’s the only reason the first half score was somewhat close. The rebounding battle wasn’t a push because MSU was coasting at the end, and Purdue grabbed a bunch in garbage time. The second half was closer to normal rebounding % which is the main reason MSU pulled away so quick.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Michigan perhaps as much

as any other team, lives and dies by the 3, and they have a wide variety of guys that can/will shoot it. Their backcourt is very quick as well. Should be a good game, but its a game Purdue should/must win.

by ruascott on Jan 24, 2012 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

What I'd like to see

It has been difficult to see Robbie’s recent struggles with his offense. While I think that his injuries have affected his shooting to some extent, I wonder if he just is trying to “carry the team” too much and, thus, press when he’s on offense. I would like to see Robbie play tonight’s game without feeling as though the team is relying solely on him and instead just play for the joy of the game (which is not to say he should play without determination or intensity). I want to see Robbie smile during this game!

BTW, I would love a win tonight – my dad, who is a 1950 Purdue grad (ME), is celebrating his 90th birthday today, and he loves Purdue basketball! :)

by e2n2purdue86 on Jan 24, 2012 11:57 AM EST reply actions  

I hope we win. Hummel needs to go to the basket more. He becomes a jump shooter. After 0-11, he should know better to aggressively attacking the basket.

by noonehere on Jan 24, 2012 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

That's what I was thinking

Not sure if its because of his knees, but you don’t see him driving to the basket much. Most everything is catch and shoot, deep around the 3 point line.

by TheBox on Jan 24, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Rob just doesn't have the lift in his jumper. Everything is short, front-rim.

Perhaps he’s got to recalibrate that push-shot shot of his to compensate.

by MPBoiler on Jan 24, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think every team has him figured out. They just put someone with long arms to defense him.
We need to find another option.

by noonehere on Jan 24, 2012 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

This should help us out a little
Outside of Jon Horford they don’t have a massive size edge

According to Jeff Goodman on twitter, Horford didn’t make the trip with the team

by Bollemaker on Jan 24, 2012 12:15 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting Tidbit

I just looked at the +/- stats. Our best player is Ryne Smith with +9.6, next is Kelsey Barlow at +7.6, and Hummel is third with +6.9.

by mastertim on Jan 24, 2012 12:16 PM EST reply actions  

I'm putting my grad school application on the line tonight

I’ll be at the Michigan reception at the AMS Conference in New Orleans tonight, which is at the same time as the game. Yes, I will have my Purdue polo on, but I may be there for only a few minutes since I want to go to the Oklahoma reception tonight, and I don’t want to upset those Wolverines/risk my grad school application.

Volleyball Correspondent for Hammer and Rails

BTFU or GTFO

by btfu_crespo on Jan 24, 2012 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

Not an Upset

It’s not an upset when we are favored by 5.

by jonyoungjcash on Jan 24, 2012 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

This.

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Jan 24, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be nice to finally beat a ranked team.

I got an e-mail from the Athletics Department saying that there were still tickets for this game. That really frustrates me because it means that fans have already lost faith.

Let’s blow out Michigan and restore faith in our team.

Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax

by Danulas on Jan 24, 2012 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

I picked up tickets last night....

Guess how much???…………………… 12 FUCKING DOLLAS

Oh ya!!!

by Boiler219 on Jan 24, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Tickets for as low as $14 apiece on Stubhub still

electronic shipping too.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 24, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Down to 9 now

I’m seriously rethinking whether I should give the NU ticket office my money for the game this weekend. Maybe some people have opinions on this?

Time to start a FanShot I’d guess.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 24, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

HUGE Game

This one is the tipping point for our Boilers. Purdue stops the 3’s and they win. ’Nuff said.

by boilerbacker31 on Jan 24, 2012 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

Crucial game but not that confident

We live and die on the 3 and it isn’t falling right now. Where we are able to win is when we have barlow and lewjack penetrating but i doubt lewjack is healthy to keep attacking. Morgan is tough inside and michigan can shoot. I think hummel still struggles and we end up losing

by dgconroy on Jan 24, 2012 3:13 PM EST reply actions  

Need to have an inside game...

…because our perimeter shooting game has been horrid. I’d like to see Hummel post up and our guards try to at least get our bigs, no matter how raw they still are, the ball. If we can’t do this, we ain’t gotta prayer in Vegas making it to the second round of the NCAA, let alone the tourney itself.

by docjay0 on Jan 24, 2012 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Blow the roof off...

I want to see/hear Mackey crazier/louder than ever tonight.

by Loco-motive on Jan 24, 2012 3:14 PM EST reply actions  

John Hart

I have a strange feeling he scores double digits tonight. Would be nice to see him play a little more. Seems to be one of the few that can create his own shot.

by IUPUI_BoilerUp on Jan 24, 2012 4:24 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Bring on the Hitman!

I’d love to see Hart get double digits and make AJ work harder. Not that he’s not working hard but make force him to compete for playing time.

by Boiler00 on Jan 24, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lancona
Purdue_pete3_small
Highlights of the 2013 class...
Small
Purdue football gets a $2 million donation
Small
Visiting Campus guidance
N13747840_45642847_3893164_small
Antavian Edison expected back.
Small
Updated Scout 2013 rankings
Small
Marcus Ball and Marlon Jones
Small
I hate to talk about them again, but what is going on at IU?
Missouri-state-coach-cuonzo-martin-celebrates_small
Bad Fit, Julius Mays???
Screen_shot_2012-05-18_at_10
Relegation in College Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete

Contributing Authors and all-around Good Dudes

195430_509104334_7314144_n_small HawkeyeBoiler

Osu_gameface_2_small Boiler Bandsman

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small John Wadas

5_students_who_small btfu_crespo

Me2_small Banski913

225900_10150176999314580_500129579_7023532_1645468_n_small BoilermakerMadey

Good_lookin_small Slandrey