Midseason Musings
Hey all, how's it going? You might remember me. I used to cover Purdue women's basketball for Hammer & Rails before I was overcome with a bad case of engineering. Sigh....you do one electrical engineering assignment and you miss half a basketball season.
I'm too far behind to game wrap individual games at this point without doing a full Grantland and dropping a several-thousand-word post. Instead, I'm just going to touch on a few key areas and take a look at the future.
The Bare Bones
First, lets look at the basics: Purdue sits at 16-3, including a win over defending national champion Texas A&M. They are also 6-0 in the Big Ten, which is good for a one game lead on the field. They've bounced around the polls, which are kind of a joke in the women's game, and currently sit at lucky number 13 in one poll and 18 in the other. down the stretch, they're looking at an excellent shot at a Big Ten title and a top 4 seed in the tournament.
Take a jump with me and we'll take a look at the highs, lows, losses, and future for this team.
The Highs
Any discussion of this season has to start with the Texas A&M win. You just don't get the chance to knock off the defending champs very often. Even more impressive is the fact that this game was sandwiched between a visit to #6 Duke and a home date with #2 Notre Dame. Even though the team trailed for the first three quarters of the game, they were in it from the tip. After a Coach Versyp collected her first technical at Purdue, the officiating improved and the team just locked in and rolled, turning a 37-29 deficit into a 60-51 final. The way this team clicked down the stretch was the first sign that these girls are going places.
You Can't Lose A Shutout
Once. That's how many times this team has given up 70 points, and that was on the second game of an absurd back-to-back (WTF, Athletic Dept?). They average just 52.6 points given up, 21.3 turnovers forced, a 33.4% opponents' shooting, and a half-dozen blocks per game. It's almost exclusively pressure man-to-man, and it just grinds opponents down. This is a team any Purdue basketball fan should be proud of.
A Word on the Losses
Put it this way: two of the losses were to #2 and #5. Let's call those forgivable, eh? Especially since we hung with Duke on their home floor. By the time the ND game rolled around, they were just out of gas. The third loss? Well, that one was to....Central Michigan. Ugh, right? Well, yes, but don't read too much into it. It was a road game literally the day after the Notre Dame game. This loss should really go on Burke's record and not Versyp's, as there's no way you can expect a team to play back-to-back like that in college.
Numbers Never* Lie
Up till now I intentionally haven't really talked about any individual players. It fits with the ethos of this team, as there really isn't a surpassing superstar. Instead, every player who sees the floor has a well-defined role that they simply perform in. Rayburn continues to be the leading scorer (15 ppg) and emotional leader. She's still got a knack for drawing charges, too, something not often seen in a leading scorer. Sam Ostarello still rebounds everything that isn't nailed down (8.0 rpg) while chipping in a handful of points nightly. Courtney Moses and KK Houser distribute (2.4 and 3.8 apg) and provide secondary scoring (9.5 and 9.2 ppg). KK is also quite the thief at 2.6 spg. Unfortunately, she also has some TO issues, which is my largest concern with this team going forward. And lastly, 5th-year senior Antionette Howard has absolutely OWNED the 6th-man role. She hasn't started a game, but averages 7.4 ppg and 3.9 rpg while providing energy and creating mismatches off the bench.
.38 Special
I'll just leave this here.
It speaks for itself.
The Stretch Run
So what now? Well, now the goal is simple: win the Big Ten Title. We have a one-game lead over Ohio State, who I am probably most concerned about if I had to pick a team. Everyone else behind them has 2 losses at least, including Nebraska and Penn State, who are probably the only two serious threats at this point. The schedule is manageable, with only 3 ranked teams left (@OSU, PSU, Neb). We get the benefit of facing those three ranked teams only once this year. Other than those 3, the away games against the Michigan schools could be tricky, as could a trip to OMHR. If we hold serve at home, though, we should get through conference play with at most 2-3 losses. Unless OSU is perfect from here, that will get us a title. It starts tomorrow against MSU, 8 o'clock in Mackey. MSU is a upper-half team in the Big Ten, and they'll be a good pointer as to where this team is when it comes to being a title contender.
Last Call
This team is gelling at the right time. They've won some tough games, some close games, and have avoided the WTF loss. They're playing well as a unit and are certainly looking like the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. I love that they've won close, too. Finding a way to win, even on the road like they did against Illinois, is a huge key to a title run. It really doesn't matter that Illinois was an inferior team; finding a way to get the win is huge. In short, this is just a fun team to watch, and one that exemplifies Purdue basketball. BTFU
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Am I correct int hat we host hte first and second rounds of the tourney?
And that we’re playing at home regardless of seed as long as we get in?
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I don't pretend to be an expert on the process, but assuming wikepedia is correct, yes.
Which I did not know, actually. I just assumed Purdue had been selected as a site like any other and we had to earn a high enough seed to get there. Who knew?
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 21, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
yeah, that's how it works in women's basketball.
it’s pretty awesomely lopsided that way. teams get a home game if they make the tourney and their school is hosting. not the same story for regionals and final four though, obviously. but that’s how it always works for the first weekend.
it’s purely money driven, too. it’s the only way they can guarantee that the first weekend is attended well.
To your call once more we rally....
by BoilerPaulie on Jan 22, 2012 6:39 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for the update
Somehow I lost he women in the shuffle—especially after Mingo’s ACL tear.
Looks like they’re doing great. Hope your engineering assignment went well. It’s tough to balance fun and work.
by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 22, 2012 12:23 AM EST reply actions
Nice Update
Can you give us weekly Ladies updates now that your eng. assignement is done? We don’t want to overload your mind or anything. And speaking of overloaded minds Morgan Burke and the Athletic dept. put a major program team in a difficult position again. This the second time today I have said this———there is a pattern here. Burke has a real habit of missing details for a business man. Bad ladies schedule, bad weather monitoring for men’s trip to Lansing and just a thought here—-we don’t need to play little old ND in anything. They would rather “play SEC teams”.
Keep it up
I like hearing about Purdue’s non-revenue generating sports.
Thanks for the update
Although I’d disagree some here.
After a Coach Versyp collected her first technical at Purdue, the officiating improved and the team just locked in and rolled, turning a 37-29 deficit into a 60-51 final.
Maybe the officiating improved, but I think a MUCH MUCH larger factor is the players respond and play some VERY inspiring basketball with hustles and lock-down defense. Several players mentioned standing up for Coach V after the game. I would put a lot less emphasis on the officials. It’s more on the players.
Also for the losses, the Duke game is forgivable, the other two not. We didn’t just “lose to” ND, we get UTTERLY DESTROYED ON OUR OWN HOME FLOOR. Thanks for being so kind. As for the Central Mich game, I know the condition was sub-optimal, but we are talking about a team who were 2-5 up to that point and has yet to win a home game.
I watch every women’s game whenever they show on BTN. I like how they play defense but their glaring weakness (and when they get into the Tournament or play any ranked teams it will be exposed quickly) is a lack of insider presence after Mingo’s injury. Well, Sam O is getting all the rebounds she can (but the team as a whole keep losing the rebounding battle), so at least that’s sth the men’s team post players can’t say.
I like how the players defend (and how Rayburn always takes charges), but they really need to cut down on the turnovers. PG KK Houser is VERY careless with the basketball, which so many times led to counter fast-break for the opposing team. (To her credit though, she is one of the hardest-working defenders)
I have no disgreement about the A&M game.
The officiating comment was more of a rhetorical device than my main point. I was more trying to highlight the effectiveness of the “good” technical, if you will, especially since Coach isn’t usually prone to those.
As for the ND game….come on. ND is currently on the short list of about 2 for the title. We had a bad game, yes, but it’s really the only one of the year. It was our 3rd top 5 opponent in a row. It was bad. But not as bad as you make out.
CMU was a 2 pm tip, on the road, the day after facing the number 2 team in the country in a physical full-court game. In essence, the travel arrangements were almost as bad as they were for the men’s team yesterday. Neither team is at fault. And for what it’s worth, CMU is now 11-8.
I’ll grant that we don’t have a go-to post scorer. However, Jones and Guyton are good enough defensively to survive. They don’t get abused like the men’s bigs on the defensive end, and that’s all we really need from them. We’ve had success containing the likes of Jantelle Lavender in previous years.
The rebounding isn’t actually that bad. Obviously Sam is the biggest part of that, but the guards box out well and have a knack for running down the long ones as well. We actually have a positive rebounding margin on the year.
KK….yeah. She gives me ulcers too. I wish she would pick up some things from Courtney, who seems to know how to go right to the very edge of control without crossing over the line. She does pick up a few steals to offset the TOs. We have a positive turnover margin on the year, but there’s definitely room for improvement.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 22, 2012 9:08 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks for this!
I had something positive to read over the weekend! All this recent MSU, Dawson, Willis stuff is getting tough to re-read.
by Bloomington.Boiler on Jan 23, 2012 9:21 AM EST reply actions
Recruits
Do you have any information on the lady BB team recruits? There are a bunch of seniors on the team, it would be nice to see what kind of skills and size are coming in.

by 















