Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Two questions re: the next 5 games

I agree with the coaches, the players should focus on the very next game only. One game at a time. But we are fans, and it's our nature to look ahead (hey, we are looking at 2013 and 2014 already).

So with that said, I wonder 1) what is the current expectation for our next 5 games (@MSU, Mich, @NW, IU, @O$U)?

2) Will you be happier if we are 1-4 (with the win over IU), or 2-3 (with the win over Mich and NW)?

Star-divide

I just can't see us winning @MSU (and have them drop 3 games in a row) or @OSU. I will be ecstatic if we can go 3-2, but if I were to bet I'll put the most money in 2-3. (My probability is 0.5% 5-0, 0.5% 4-1, 10% 3-2, 50% 2-3 and 39% 1-4)

And for me, I always go for wins, so I'll be happier to be 2-3.

Stuff in the FanPosts is entirely at the discretion of those that post them. They do not represent the views of Hammer & Rails, SBNation, or Purdue University in any way.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm saying 1-4

Maybe 0-5. I just don’t see us winning any game other than Northwestern. Call me a doubter, but until i see some consistency, i’m very timid with my picks.

by Boiler219 on Jan 18, 2012 12:34 AM EST reply actions  

3-2 I just hope it's not February 3-2 and then do nothing in March

Meaning if we do play this stretch well I hope we play well in the tourney too. I think we’ll give IU a run as well as the 2 Michigan schools but I think OSU will out quick us and we might stumble at Northwestern. So beat MSU, Michigan, and IU and lose to OSU and Northwestern just b/c this team is such a roller-coaster.

by lift26 on Jan 18, 2012 1:06 AM EST reply actions  

Could go anywhere from 5-0 or 0-5

Honestly. I wouldn’t put any money on any B10 game this year. Poor choices.

by Purdue_it on Jan 18, 2012 2:05 AM EST reply actions  

1.) I’ll say 3-2 with us winning at n’western and home games.
2.) I am one of those people who takes great joy in beating indiana. If that was our only win over the next 5, I would be OK with that although I would be super pissed to lose at home again. Home losses aggrevate me to no end.

by Scotty A on Jan 18, 2012 7:59 AM EST reply actions  

I'm leaning this way as well

But I wouldn’t be shocked to lose at home to Michigan or IU, just hopefully not IU, it will be hard enough to win there this year as it is.

by BoilerGOZ on Jan 18, 2012 9:32 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

3-2

I am calling for a surprisingly close game @MSU but eventually falling short.

Wining in the last minute of the Michigan game at home.

Come from behind win @NW with barlow scoring 21 (18 in the 2nd half).

Feeding off the hate that spills out from the stands and beat IU.

Another 20 point blow out at OSU.

I am awful at predicting but that’s my 2 cents

by BoilermakerAustin on Jan 18, 2012 8:13 AM EST reply actions  

2-3

I think we will have a rough go of it at northwestern. It seems like we always struggle up there. The zone d that they plays gives us fits.
I hope the paint crew brings back the black gloves for the IU game. That was really cool and really loud last year when they did it against O$U last year.

by speboiler2060 on Jan 18, 2012 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

I am sure as I am saying it now I'll jinx it

Some has called us maddeningly inconsistent this year. For the last 5 games we were W-L-W-L-W. It seems like we have a real shot to continue the trend with L-W-L-W-L for the next 5, with all the losses on the road. That would make it 10 straight games where we don’t have consecutive wins or losses. That seems to describe our season well.

by charlespig on Jan 18, 2012 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

I'm one of those people

But as I read your comment, I realize we’re consistently inconsistent. I’d take my lumps and deal with L-W-L-W-L.

by AAMB Boiler on Jan 18, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Our football team did that for a long time this year, alternating wins and losses. Weird.

by Scotty A on Jan 18, 2012 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

can't argue much with this

It’s be nice to slip a W between the two on your list. I’m optimistic about us @ NW if we can keep from looking forward to IU.

by BoilerGOZ on Jan 18, 2012 9:36 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Northwestern

They’re no cake walk with that 1-3-1 zone. I go every year and they have lost 3-4 times I’ve been (they didn’t play there last year). And the time they won JJ banked in a free throw with 2 seconds left. If they don’t stop the back cuts and can’t hit from the outside, it will be an L. Winning on the road is tough in the B1G. I’ll be happy with 3-2,but 1-5 seems more likely. Michigan at home is a must win.

by boilerbacker31 on Jan 18, 2012 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

If the last 2 weeks have taught us anything...

It’s that any team in the B1G can winn on any given night, on any given floor. Home court advantage seems to mean a little less than it used to, and upsets are running rampant. Maybe Purdue pulls some big upsets and goes 4-1, or even 5-0! Equally likely is 1-4 or 0-5 unfortunately, that’s just how tight the teams in the conference are. My % would be :

0-5: 16.66%
1-4: 16.66%
2-3: 16.68%
3-2: 16.68%
4-1: 16.66%
5-0: 16.66%

by AAMB Boiler on Jan 18, 2012 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Yes and no

Yes, any B1G team can beat any other on any given night (just look at us blowing out the conf leading Ill and get blown away by the conf bottom PSU and it says it all).

No, I think home court matters A LOT. The losses for OSU and MSU all come on the road. Ill’s only loss come on the road. Mich’s two losses all come on the road. These are the TOP teams in the conference, which just shows how difficult it is to win on the road in the B1G this year.

But thank you for your precision :-)

by charlespig on Jan 18, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Precision

Did you note the extra .02% on the middle two options? I didn’t want to leave .04% unaccounted for, I can’t imagine the flack I would take for such an egregious error from a board full of Purdue alumni. We hold ourselves to higher standards here.

On a side note, it was very tempting to assign the .04% to Hightower being awarded a victory in lieu of either team, since his refereeing was so mind blowingly shitty great that the outcome of the game was deemed insignificant. I want everyone to know that I took the high road instead.

by AAMB Boiler on Jan 18, 2012 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

For the record, yes, I noticed the extra .02% b/c I made sure they added up to 100% :-)

by charlespig on Jan 18, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too

I happen to remember a bunch of repeating fractions.

I’m surprised HTML doesn’t have an upperscore actually so we can indicate the repeating fraction.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 18, 2012 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean the repeating decimal

Fractions (or odds in this case) would have avoided the issue all together.

Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax

by Danulas on Jan 18, 2012 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

They wont win at OSU. They can beat the other 4 though, MSU at home being the toughest challenge

by mrpink51089 on Jan 18, 2012 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

Correct me if I am wrong

But weren’t we the last team to win at OSU?

by Purdue_it on Jan 18, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct me if I am wrong too

If we lose to o$u, doesn’t that take away our ability to say that we have a winning record against every team in the big ten? I’ve always been proud of that statistic.

by Scotty A on Jan 18, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

You are correct

We would then be tied with them.

by herby20 on Jan 18, 2012 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

if Illinois can beat OSU

I don’t know why we absolutely can’t. Don’t think we will, but don’t lose hope.

by BoilerGOZ on Jan 18, 2012 9:40 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Oh I believe we "can", but won't

One thing I learn from bball is that you HAVE TO believe you CAN win. It doesn’t matter how big of an underdog you are. You HAVE TO believe in your guts that if everything goes right there is a chance that we CAN win. If you don’t believe that, the game is lost already.

But that’s for players. I am not playing the game – I am just a fan.

Notice though, O$U has not been beaten at home, which is where we are playing at. Even last year’s team with JJ and E’Twaun lay an egg there. Another thing, we don’t have a guy like Paul who can hit 43. Heck, I don’t think we’ll have TWO players to combine for more than 43. To pull an upset, you kinda need someone to go unconscious shooting light out to give your team a chance.

by charlespig on Jan 18, 2012 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Robbie definitely can.

Brandon Paul was only averaging 7 or 8 points a game when he shot that many. Hummel has gone off on insane shooting sprees before (even against the mentioned team). I don’t think we will beat them either though. If it was at home, maybe. It took arguably the greatest Purdue team since Wooden was here to win in the Schott over a good Buckeye team.

by herby20 on Jan 18, 2012 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope

Robbie is not the “create his own shots” kind of lights-out shooter. Sure, he can shoot light-out – we saw that in the first half of the O$U game in his junior year where he made 8 threes in a half, but he did it when he wasn’t the first option and he took wide-open shots. With the way defense is gonna key on him since he is the main threat, he won’t be able to shoot like Paul, nor do we want him to. Some of Paul’s shots are tightly contested and really bad shots IMO that just happened to fall. Robbie is a much smarter and less selfish player that he would want to pass it around and got his team a better quality shot, hence you won’t see 43 pts. Heck, I don’t think ANY Purdue player this year will score more than 30 in ANY game.

by charlespig on Jan 19, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, other than one shot-clock beater, almost all of Paul's shots that night came out of Illinois' offense.

which is unusual for him, as he tends to be the lone gunman type normally. On that night, though, he was playing within the system.

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 19, 2012 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

haha.

Have you paid any attention to how OSU has been playing at home. They aren’t just winning. They are destroying everyone who walks in there.

by ruascott on Jan 19, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I just hope we put up a fight

Don’t just roll over. Play as if we get nothing to lose. Play without regard of the scoreboard. If we lose, fine, but don’t let anyone say we don’t play hard. We may not be as talented as them, but don’t let them outwork us or outhustle us, that is sth I cannot accept.

by charlespig on Jan 19, 2012 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm waffling between 3-2 and 2-3

I think we lose at MSU and at OSU, possibly in blowouts.
I think we win vs IU with our defense pressuring them into turnovers and by not allowing Zeller to get the ball.
I think we have a decent chance UM. I think if they win at Arkansas we have a much better chance than if they lose. I’m afraid Smotrycz will go off because he’s a big goofy white kid who can hit 3s.
I’m unsure of the game at NW. More often than not they give us trouble on the road. And with our trouble against big goofy white kids… and NW being full of big goofy white kids, it could be trouble.
I guess I’d say
0% 5-0
3% 4-1
35% 3-2
40% 2-3
17% 1-4
5% 0-5

by JAZ1142 on Jan 18, 2012 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

I honestly think

we’ll do just fine at MSU. OSU I’m less convinced about, but I think at MSU will at the very least be close. It’s not like they’re Penn State or anything.

by Purdue_it on Jan 18, 2012 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

2-3 but might be 1-4.

This years IU game is going to be last years O$U’s game. I think everyone is going to be so pumped that it might be a killing. [hopefully of IU]

The other game win would be Northwestern but we’ve lost lately up there due to their zone.

O$U is an auto lose.

UM will be close, but probably a loss. Good guards have cut us up this year. I can see Burke and Hardaway Jr. killing us. Lewjack is too short and hurt to keep up & Kenny seems more focused on offense.

MSU … If we can contain Appling, could be close but probably not. I think they are going to be pissed from the UM game so don’t expect much overlook from them.

by TheBox on Jan 18, 2012 2:47 PM EST reply actions  

Here's my probabilities

.6 for iu, UM and NU.

.1 for @OSU, @MSU

Expected wins = 2

5.184% 0 wins
24.48% 1 win
40.24% 2 wins
25.56% 3 wins
4.32% 4 wins
.216% 5 wins

Yeah, I have a program for that. Yeah, it’s in Perl. Yeah, I’ll be reusing it if this sort of topic comes up again.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 18, 2012 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

This is what I get for writing for a program with a bunch of math nerds

I have no idea what Perl is.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 18, 2012 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I'm nothing compared to some.

There are people who can put my coding skills to shame easily. I google their stuff (usually written 8 years ago) daily and rip it off to do what I need to do for my job, or for my own little experiments, probably missing some big general point.

Heavy duty folks play “code golf” to write up a program with the smallest number of characters.

For anyone REALLY curious, activestate.perl.com has a windows runtime to install. Save the code below to probs.pl then run probs.pl .6,.6,.6,.1,.1,.1 … this could be done with spreadsheets too but you had to figure an Engineering school would get someone who did this (even though I was only born in WL, I still remember the wind tunnel and the math library…)

http://shorttext.com/6dOj3l

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 18, 2012 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Once again...

I was a COMMUNICATIONS major.

math beyond Algebra is a mystery to me, though I did get an A in Calculus in high school.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 18, 2012 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

A in calculus is darn good

Don’t let anyone say otherwise.

Hopefully it doesn’t feel like I’m pushing this on you. Part of me is generally surprised at how English-like software programming can be. It’s actually good for business and productivity in some cases. I could go into a long spiel about how even as a math person I was scared of computer code, but that’s another story. You might be surprised at how much programming languages have bent to the need to be easily communicated, because people get frustrated at them, or the lack of comments.

Plus, I figured I’d share with anyone involved. Just in case they were interested or wanted to try fun stuff in the future.

But yeah, anyway, back to basketball.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 18, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

It's all good

I was actually quite a science and math whiz growing up, but I always wanted to be involved in sports in some way, so I aimed toward English and broadcasting. I also did it because people said it was my weakness and I wanted to make it a strength.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Jan 18, 2012 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

omg holy war time!

Err, actually, I’ve never read a line of python. Any suggestions where to start? I’m interested.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 18, 2012 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I learned it at Purdue in ECE 364

So I don’t know any introductions on the web that are good. It’s pretty easy to learn though.

You could try this: http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman/python_101/python_101.html

by chops1221 on Jan 18, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Two xkcd comics in a thread? Yes please!

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Jan 19, 2012 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh the horror.

“hello, world” a two word phrase etched in the memory of anyone unfortunate enough to slog through a programming class taught by Crum, and his god awful exams. I can see the nightmarish visions of that phrase repeating over and over in an infinite loop.

by AAMB Boiler on Jan 19, 2012 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

If this thread weren't civil we could have 3

“Duty Calls” tends to work in many settings, you know.

by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 19, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

For Completeness sake... and to illustrate a small point about statistics

1 WIN: 1 Home = 23.3% ; 1 Away = 1.1%
2 WIN: 2 Home = 35% ; 1 Home, 1 Away = 5.1% ; 2 Away = 0.06%
3 WIN: 3 Home = 17.4% ; 2 Home, 1 Away = 7.8% ; 2 Away, 1 Home = 0.2%
4 WIN: 3 Home, 1 Away = 3.9% ; 2 Home, 2 Away = 0.4%
5 WIN: 3 Home, 2 Away = 0.2%

The breakdown shows that we are statistically more likely to win 2 home and 2 away than only 2 away. This might seem counter-intuitive, since 2 wins seem like they would always be easier to come by than 4. And on the whole, this is true.

BUT, if we do manage to with the two road games, it is more likely that we should be able to pick up one or more home games rather than only being able to win on the road. In real life, a team that can win on the road is a good team, and should win a lot at home.

If Beavis had chosen different probabilities, this wouldn’t have been the case. Since it is logically consistent, this is at least a face validation of the values he picked.

P.S. – Beavis, I’ve never tried programming, so I ran these by hand. Your method seems much more efficient. And for what it’s worth, I say 3 wins.

I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more Purdue basketball

by BoileRx on Jan 18, 2012 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, pls redo your work

We have 3 road games, @MSU, @NW and @OSU sandwiching the two home games Mich and IU.

by charlespig on Jan 19, 2012 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Gahhhhh.... Right you are

I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more Purdue basketball

by BoileRx on Jan 19, 2012 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh I think we could go 3-2

The away games will be losses. IU doesn’t seem to have the hang of playing away yet, Michigan will be tough, and NW will probably be closer than it should.

by herby20 on Jan 18, 2012 11:29 PM EST reply actions  

2-3

is most likely. 0-5, 1-4, and 3-2 is also a possibility.

The chances of winning @ OSU is next to nothing. The chance winning @ MSU is only slightly better. IMO both of those teams will be undefeated at home the entire season.

by ruascott on Jan 19, 2012 10:18 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lancona
Purdue_pete3_small
Highlights of the 2013 class...
Small
Purdue football gets a $2 million donation
Small
Visiting Campus guidance
N13747840_45642847_3893164_small
Antavian Edison expected back.
Small
Updated Scout 2013 rankings
Small
Marcus Ball and Marlon Jones
Small
I hate to talk about them again, but what is going on at IU?
Missouri-state-coach-cuonzo-martin-celebrates_small
Bad Fit, Julius Mays???
Screen_shot_2012-05-18_at_10
Relegation in College Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete

Contributing Authors and all-around Good Dudes

195430_509104334_7314144_n_small HawkeyeBoiler

Osu_gameface_2_small Boiler Bandsman

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small John Wadas

5_students_who_small btfu_crespo

Me2_small Banski913

225900_10150176999314580_500129579_7023532_1645468_n_small BoilermakerMadey

Good_lookin_small Slandrey