Doug Gottlieb: Career Dolt
As you know, I love delivering a proper public shaming to "professional" writers that get paid a whole lot more than I do, yet they don't bother to back up their opinions with these silly little things called facts. I enjoy looking into statistics and trying to find an explanation for much of what we see. People like Gottlieb, however, prefer to make blind generalizations based on the flavor of the moment. Yesterday, he was in rare form, as pointed out by Jackson Brunner in a fanpost:
-Painter regrets staying at Purdue and would have been better off at Missouri. He says Painter's friends believe that him staying is a mistake.
-Robbie Hummel would go to IU if he came out of high school now because Purdue is 4th in the pecking order of players coming out high school in Indiana.
-Purdue's 2012 class sucks and Hammons is the only slightly decent player in it.
Let's look at point No. 1, that Painter is unhappy at Purdue and regrets staying at Missouri. It came from this specific tweet, which was followed up with this tweet as a response:
@BoilerNick MU has great facilities,great AD-STL/KC to recruit from--Purdue AD doesnt have a rep like Alden
Great facilities. Hmmm, yes, Missouri has a brand new arena, but Purdue just spent nine figures to upgrade Mackey Arena and create one of the finest practice facilities in the country. Painter also know that virtually every home game will have 5,000 maniacal students going crazy in Mackey Arena. Just because Missouri is off to an excellent start this year does not mean he regrets taking the job. We receive a lot of flak for not making a Final Four in 32 years, but Missouri has never made a Final Four. They are even more of a little brother to their main rival, Kansas, than we are to Indiana. They haven't won a non-vacated conference title since 1990 and their new arena and facilities cannot be that much better the ones we just added.
This argument is simply Gottlieb going with the flavor of the moment. Miami fans will tell you: Frank Haith is someone who excels at hot starts, then fades over time. It was his M.O. with the Hurricanes. Missouri is 13-0 beating California, the same Illinois team we just trounced (and they only won by 4), and...7-7 Villanova? Let's see Missouri actually play somebody before anointing them the greatest ever, okay? Of course, they beat an OMG TOTALLY AWESOME BIG EAST team, so they are clearly a destination program that has coaches resigning across the country to coach there for free.
Also, I'll take Indiana's top talent over St. Louis/Kansas City any day of the week.
Next is point No. 2, that Robbie Hummel would go to IU right now if he were coming out of high school. Since many players of Hummel's caliber are recruited and commit as juniors before signing their letter of intent early in their senior years, we have to go back to the 2005-06 season to compare records:
Purdue in 2005-06 - 9-19, 3-13 Big Ten
Indiana in 2005-06 - 19-12, 9-7 Big Ten, Lost in NCAA second round
Head-to-head meetings: Indiana won 62-49 in Bloomington and 70-59 in West Lafayette
So, as you can see, Indiana was an NCAA Tournament team, though they had been better in the seasons leading up to 2005-06 and had been to a Final Four within the previous five years (2002). The jury is still out on Indiana this year, but they are definitely an NCAA Tournament team right now and look like a lock to win 22-24 games to get a decent seed. They're playing as well as anyone at home, but on the road there are still questions. Trips to Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin and Purdue will be tough. They also won't have every opposing team make completely boneheaded decisions in the final two minutes at Assembly Hall like Ohio State and Kentucky did, so I am thinking 13-5 in the Big Ten for them and a solid seed.
Purdue, as you can see, was in a much, much worse place at the time Robbie committed. We had a 7-21 season in Keady's final year right before that. That's 16 victories in two years before Hummel signed, as opposed to 12 (and counting) in this season so far. This is a weaker Purdue team than in recent seasons, but it is still a likely NCAA Tournament team as long as it reaches 10 wins in Big Ten play. Hummel would also have some solid other talent coming in with his incoming class if he were a 2012 or 2013 commit. That talent is equal or better to what he had in 2007, and it enters with the program light years better than back then. Sorry Doug, but not only is your argument invalid, it is completely absurd. If Rob had wanted to go to IU back then, he would have, even though he is just a role player that is finally contributing in his later years according to the great Terry Hutchens.
Finally, there is point three, which is so absurd it shouldn't even merit discussion, but sadly, it does:
Nah, Mizzou is the school in State,Purdue is at best 2nd-more likely 4th to IU,UK,tOSU in Indiana kid pecking order
Clearly, Gottlieb has absolutely no idea how recruiting in this state. I can give him Ohio State, seeing as how some of the state's best talent in recent years like Greg Oden, Mike Conley, Mark Titus, and Deshaun Thomas ended up there. Indiana is a close battle, but it always is in this state. They have the edge right now, but we had it before. It fluctuates, but that is what happens when you have two solid programs. Neither one has an edict from God to always be the top choice of every big-name recruit in the state. Just ask Glenn Robinson, E'Twaun Moore, Hummel, etc. There is plenty of talent to go around in this state too in most years, so it often gets split, anyway. Talent alone does not equal Final Fours, either, as both teams have one Final Four combined since 1992.
Saying Kentucky is a choice for the top players in Indiana is completely absurd. One player, Marquis Teague, chose Kentucky, and he is an incredibly overrated player that doesn't even have a jump shot. His game is perfect for Kentucky, because he can get to the rim. At Purdue and Indiana he would be asked to score from the perimeter, distribute, and play defense. He wasn't even one of the best players in the state and his teams never won with any consistency here. As shown in the IU game this year and pretty much throughout his high school career, he was outclassed by anyone who knows the basic fundamentals of basketball. Indiana and Purdue's programs thrive on those. Kentucky's does not.
Before Teague, who was the last recruit Kentucky poached from the state of Indiana. Rivals only lists back to 2002, and there were none back to then. Lawrence North center John Stewart was a project player that committed to Kentucky in the class of 1999, but he tragically died of a heart ailment in his final high school game before joining Tubby Smith's team. The only notable player I can think of that left the state of Indiana for Kentucky is Kyle Macy back in 1976, and he even went to Purdue first!
The truth of the matter is that many kids in Indiana are conditioned to stay in-state and avoid Kentucky. Shoot, we have even had the Indiana-Kentucky High School All-Star series for decades. As someone that grew up playing basketball in this state I can tell you, NO ONE in Indiana even considers Kentucky as a kid. Teague only went because it suits his flawed NBA game and it would get him the league faster. Doug, if you're going to make a statement about where kids from Indiana would go instead of Purdue, at least pick a school that has gotten regular recruits from this state.
In terms of our current recruits, I guess two four-star players, a shooting guard that is lighting it up, and A.J. Hammons (our best player according to him) as one of our lowest rated players is a truly awful class that will have us competing for MEAC title before long. I really hope they don't result in us getting relegated from the Big Ten.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yeah Indiana's wins against Kentucky and Ohio State don't count
because Ohio State and Kentucky didn’t play perfectly in the final minutes.
As for the Hummel coming in with better talent in 12-13 than he did in 07-08. Not a chance. No way in hell the next two Purdue classes even rival the capabilities of Scott Martin, Hummel, JJ, Etwaun, LewJack, Smith and Hart. 2 of those guys were 4 year starters Martin and JJ would/were 3 year starters and LewJack and Smith are role player extraordinaires. Plus JJ finished as an All-American and Etwaun was close. In Purdue’s next two classes the only guy that could even consider making that sort of contribution to the program from day 1 would be Kendall Stephens. The others will all get their minutes but none of them could hold a candle to the way JJ, Martin, Hummel and Moore were out of high school and as freshmen.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
Oh, I think the definitely count
They are certainly great wins that any team would love to have. you have to admit though, Kentucky not fouling or guarding the inbounder, plus OSU not even trying to get the ball to Sullinger after Zeller was out, was pretty dumb. Indiana might still win if they do those things, but by not doing those things OSU and Kentucky made things easier.
Also, I think Hammons or Simpson will likely be better than JJ, at least when he was a freshman. Johnson didn’t contribute a ton that year because he wasn’t ready, but Hammons and Simpson are more ready. Davis and Scott are lighting up the scoreboard this year. Davis had 39 and a game-winner on Friday.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Stretch!
Martin left after one year. Ryne did nothing for 2 years and I doubt anyone ever said “Wow Purdue just picked up Ryne Smith”! John Hart was a late signee (I believe we were his biggest offer), and has been hurt most of his career, but has shown flashes throughout his career. Now E’twan, JaJuan, and LewJack have been great.
Maybe those 2 years have better top level talent, but these next 2 ARE deeper. And we aren’t going to expect all these kids to play at the level of the 07 class.
Also I think the fact that you mention Ryne and Hart shows that rankings don’t matter that much because Painter has done a great job developing these kids. Isn’t it possible Painter turns one ot two of these kids into a star?
by Boiler17 on Jan 1, 2012 8:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
You Had Me at Scott Martin...
You sooo funny
by ZoKnowsDefense on Jan 1, 2012 9:56 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Yeah, they don't count
A lot of IU critics seem to think that only talent and not, you know, actual execution matter.
by ChicagoHoosier on Jan 2, 2012 12:59 AM EST up reply actions
this is funny
No way in hell the next two Purdue classes even rival the capabilities of Scott Martin, Hummel, JJ, Etwaun, LewJack, Smith and Hart.
You’ve got to be kidding me? Really? Won’t even rival? When the ‘13 class will rank about the same as the baby boilers class and the ’12 class is simply way better than Smith and LewJack’s class it is clear that they will not only rival but will be better.
It's the ol'
Say something enflaming/ stupid, and when people bitch and moan say “Oh i work for ESPN i don’t have to care what you think” defense.
Almost all personaltites at ESPN have an agenda be it : ND, and SEC Football; IU, OSU, Kentucky and UNC Basketball; or whatever ‘historic’ program / team of the moment they can play off for ratings, see money.
No Accontability!
Mizzou’s bball tradition doesn’t even hold a candle to ours. Does Gottleib even know Painter is a Purdue alum? I’m guessing it would be more satisfying to take your school to the promiseland compared to another school. I’ve heard our facilities are top of the line.
Commenting on Hummel is ridiculous. How can he speculate like that? Purdue has got some good in state players signed up for the next 2 years. IUs might be a little better, but wow what a statement.
Also do other schools in the conference have as many problems with BTN as we do? Not even mentioned on The Finale, after a great win. I can’t believe they couldn’t even mention us or MSU when there are only 4 bball games, 1 bowl game and a small piece on the Rose Bowl. Absurd!
Go get them TMill! Gottleib is a tool!
by Boiler17 on Jan 1, 2012 8:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Hey guys nice1 over the illini
IU fan here,,Why worry what Gottleib says, he’s a tool…His unsuccessful time at ND has made him hate on all of Indiana…I’m sure CMP is where he wants to be…If Hummel wanted to go to IU he would be there….Must have not cared for tOSU and UK the second and 3rd picks either LOL .What a joke,,, anyway I think James Blackmon Sr would be the only Indiana boy that choose UK( was Co-Mr Basketball with Alford 1983 I think )since Teague I can think of…..To hell with the tool and his tweet account, Its a free country , he can be an Idiot in front of who ever he wants…Good luck rest of the year
Affects Programs
These idiots influence young kids who may end up being future recruits. So for Gottleib to say Painter isn’t happy at Purdue isn’t a rumor we want spread, especially after this past spring.
Plus as Purdue fans we know we constantly overcome media stereotypes and lack of coverage. The states largest paper barely even acknowledges us.
Good win for IU as well. Any loss by OSU helps everyone. Can’t wait for the IU games this year and for years to come!
by Boiler17 on Jan 1, 2012 8:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Way too much
credit to the tool….if a kid has interest in PU or tOSU or UK what Gottleib tweets isn’t going to effect a kids decision …..wheather the tweets be good or bad….you got to give kids more credit than that.
Not just Gottleib
It’s not just one person. We are continually fighting the media in general. We are generally ignored, see ‘09-’10 season when people like Gary Parrish said we weren’t on the same level as Texas and Kentucky because we didn’t have future NBA players (turns out JJ and E’twan are pretty good). It wasn’t until February after winning at MSU and OSU before the media started to talk about us. And then Hummel got hurt. Last year all we heard was we didn’t have a third scorerer, and we were dropped from 3 to 22 in the pre-season rankings. We ended up being in the top 15 all year. So yea we are a little sensistive when it comes to the media’s perception of us.
Oh and BTN has tried to ignore us all year this year. We had 2 (maybe 3) games not even broadcast live this year, and tape delayed for the next day. One of which was cut into because of Urban Meyers press conference, and then they didn’t even go back to our game they just went into the next scheduled program. Then they tried to broadcast a game without sending announcers and had technical difficulties, so they couldn’t even do play by play while the video feed was lost.
These are real events, so we get upset when the media ignores us or talks shit (especially without using facts) about us.
LOL, it won't be sooooo ridiculous had he said MSU instead of UK
Purdue is at best 2nd-more likely 4th to IU,UK,tOSU in Indiana kid pecking order
Statement like this means he really has no clue what he’s talking about.
I would put UNC in there too.
Unfortunately.
by ChicagoHoosier on Jan 2, 2012 1:01 AM EST up reply actions
The UK notion is absurd
Indiana kids headed to the state of Michigan, now that’s a different story. I frankly couldn’t care less if a kid wants to go to UL or UK. Can’t do much harm to Purdue there (sans the tourney, obviously). But when Sparty and UM start beating us out for former players’ offspring, that’s highly bothersome to me…
Makers All?
by icet15 on Jan 2, 2012 1:12 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Couldn't agree more
Within the ‘11, ’12, and ’13, Purdue has missed out on five very solid recruits to Sparty and Big Blue. (Dawson and Harris to MSU/ Mitch McGary, G-Rob3, and Zak Irvin to UM). Sucks that we couldn’t land at least one of these guys.
BTFU
Follow Me @Evan_Williams25
I agree they are good
but extenuating circumstances contributed to all of them for the most part.
by jack'sIUdisdain on Jan 3, 2012 6:30 AM EST up reply actions
Very true
We stopped recruiting McGary, we didn’t go after Irvin after Smotherman committed, Robinson didn’t want to follow in dad’s footsteps. Stuff is understandable, I just don’t like seeing us miss out on some of these guys.
BTFU
Follow Me @Evan_Williams25
good thought
only problem I have is you say “they need back up their opinions with facts”……It’s their opinion…it doesn’t need to be to justified. It can be disputed and create discussion. An opinion can be nonsensical or justified with a lab-full of scientists, Opinions don’t have to be back up by facts,
The problem is...
Point #1 especially was stated more as a fact rather than an opinion, and as was mentioned above, that’s a nasty rumor to be starting.
All of this falls into the category of flaming to gain readers and followers, and its a dangerous trend that’s growing in professional sports journalism.
BTFU!
by BoilerAdam on Jan 1, 2012 9:11 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
good point
That is a very nasty rumor to start, and why? What for? Who pissed in his cornflakes this morning?
Hopefully he’s taking the beating in the twitterverse he deserves
>Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
>Don't cry, MSU - It's just a game...
On the other hand
Point #3 will make for great bulletin board material, and will be fun to throw back in his face repeatedly over the coming seasons.
BTFU!
by BoilerAdam on Jan 1, 2012 9:13 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
The joys of idiots in media
Something tells me this guy would have a harder time getting to West Lafayette than Digger did.
Volleyball Correspondent for Hammer and Rails
BTFU or GTFO
Probably wouldn't be as good a sport when he got there
Digger took the ribbing well IIRC.
It’s weird—people like Gottlieb don’t seem worth bothering about. But figuring the how and why can be pretty rewarding.
by Beavis Beefcake on Jan 1, 2012 9:17 PM EST up reply actions
Glad you posted this.
I can’t stand Gottleib. When I read his Twitter comments I wanted to do something but wasn’t sure what.
If he wants to spread negative air over Purdue then I wanted to do what I could to discredit him and call him out. This site is the perfect way to make him eat his words and make him realize we aren’t pushovers.
He’s an asshat.
Close by the Wabash, In famed Hoosier land, Stands old Purdue, Serene and Grand, Cherished in Memory,By all her sons and daughters true, Fair Alma Mater, All Hail Purdue
by BoilerUpAT on Jan 1, 2012 9:27 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Definition of Libel....Hmmmm
1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander, which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. Publication need only be to one person, but it must be a statement which claims to be fact and is not clearly identified as an opinion. While it is sometimes said that the person making the libelous statement must have been intentional and malicious, actually it need only be obvious that the statement would do harm and is untrue. Proof of malice, however, does allow a party defamed to sue for general damages for damage to reputation, while an inadvertent libel limits the damages to actual harm (such as loss of business) called special damages. Libel per se involves statements so vicious that malice is assumed and does not require a proof of intent to get an award of general damages. Libel against the reputation of a person who has died will allow surviving members of the family to bring an action for damages. Most states provide for a party defamed by a periodical to demand a published retraction. If the correction is made, then there is no right to file a lawsuit. Governmental bodies are supposedly immune to actions for libel on the basis that there could be no intent by a non-personal entity, and further, public records are exempt from claims of libel. However, there is at least one known case in which there was a financial settlement as well as a published correction when a state government newsletter incorrectly stated that a dentist had been disciplined for illegal conduct. The rules covering libel against a “public figure” (particularly a political or governmental person) are special, based on U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The key is that to uphold the right to express opinions or fair comment on public figures, the libel must be malicious to constitute grounds for a lawsuit for damages. Minor errors in reporting are not libel, such as saying Mrs. Jones was 55 when she was only 48, or getting an address or title incorrect. 2) v. to broadcast or publish a written defamatory statement.
by ZoKnowsDefense on Jan 1, 2012 9:52 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
The Big Ten didn't want Mizzou
And they never will.
by bukowski_boiler on Jan 1, 2012 11:47 PM EST reply actions
This is known and understood by any Mizzou fan with a brain.
Much happier in our new conference anyway.
"When among evil companions, try to fit in." - Wild Bill Donovan
Rocky Balboa once told me, "Nothing is real if you don't believe in who you are."
I need this time back...
Gotlieb is a tool no doubt, and gave us three convincing proofs of it via those comments. However it occurs to me that trying to prove why Gotlieb is a moron is like trying to prove that an orange is orange. I mean, just look at it. So, I feel bad that you’ve used valuable time in your life to rebut this idiot.
by BoilerGOZ on Jan 2, 2012 12:44 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions 1 recs
+1
Don’t even dignify stupidity or agenda driven statements with a rebuttal.
by PU03 on Jan 2, 2012 8:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
ah, but the pageviews, my friends...
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

BFIB<BFSE........KC needs more Edwin Carl
by tiquanunderwear on Jan 2, 2012 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
lmao
On the kindle fire, if you switch tabs and leave this page up, when you come back the gig plays in double time until it catches up…
Boiler Up! Hammer Down!
by JuJuan some Moore? on Jan 2, 2012 11:28 AM EST up reply actions
Motivation for the future.
Usually when someone like Gottlieb steps out and makes ridiculous bold statements like this it turns around to bite them in the ass. If our players and staff get wind of this poo-pooing of The old gold and black, they will be even more motivated to kick ass. Its the kind of motivation Shaka smart used on his team their whole NCAA run. Also, if there are kids out there dumb enough to base their committment decisions on the ubsubstantiated rumors that an idiot like Gottlieb spreads, then I garauntee you we don’t want them. Boiler Up!
Breaking news: It's a new year.
Not so breaking news: Gottleib is still an ignorant jackass.
Ed Snider is a crotchety old fuck.
That is all.
Any amount of respect I had for Gottlieb
Was erased with this nonsense. What a joke.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Some Missouri fans found this page
Wow, first of all, welcome and thanks for the page hits. Second, you’re better than I thought three weeks ago now that you’ve played some competition. Congrats!
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog





















