Notre Dame: A Preview
First off, there is an administrative thing to take care of. Samsung is asking us to post the weekly results of the Blogpoll as well as the SBNation Blogpoll wrap up column. That can be found here. I am sure the good folks at Samsung will enjoy the extra traffic generated from the Notre Dame preview post. As much as I dislike it, Notre Dame football is page view gold, so this week's preview will bring a ton of eyes to the site. If this is your first visit, then welcome.
My dislike of the Fighting Irish is long noted, but this year's version is a good team that would be -0 if it had not gotten in its own way. Through four games Notre Dame has an astounding 15 turnovers. They remind me a lot of 2002 squad. That team was 7-6 after a bowl win, but all six losses were by less than a touchdown and at least four could be attributed directly to turning the ball over at the absolute worst time. The culmination was what I refer to as the most frustrating loss in Purdue football history. We dropped a game 24-17 in South Bend in which we outplayed the Irish all day and gave up only three points on defense, only to give up a fumble returned for a touchdown, and fumble into the end zone for a touchdown on the following kickoff, and a late interception for a touchdown.
When you think of Notre Dame this year they have followed a similar path. They outgained South Florida only to be undone by five turnovers. The loss to Michigan saw more turnovers and two defensive breakdowns in the final few minutes. Last week at Pittsburgh The offense struggled mightily and Tommy Rees had two more turnovers. The Michigan State game is the only one in which the Irish have benefitted from takeways, as an interception inside the five ended a key drive for the Spartans.
Based on the way both squads have played, I don't see Purdue staying in this game long unless those turnover difficulties continue. Our Boilers have turned the ball over only three times this year, with one interception. While we haven't been particularly adept at taking the ball away (just two interceptions and a fumble recovery) we have at least held on to the ball. This area will be the largest factor Saturday night.
2010 Record: 8-5
Bowl Result: Defeated Miami 33-17 in Sun Bowl
Blog Representation: One Foot Down, UHND, NDNation, Irish Roundtable, Inside the Irish
Series with Purdue: Notre Dame leads 54-26-2 (Notre Dame leads Shillelagh portion 35-19)
Last Purdue win: 9/29/2007 at Purdue 33-19
Last Notre Dame win: 9/4/2010 at Notre Dame 23-12
Quarterbacks:
Coach Hope has named Caleb TerBush the starter, but I would be shocked if we don't see Robert Marve on the field for a substantial portion of Saturday's game. I've been pleased with both so far. TerBush hasn't set the world on fire, but he also hasn't killed us with only one interception in three games. Tommy Rees has seized the starting job from Dayne Crist, but his propensity for giving the ball away has nearly sent Crist back in on multiple occasions. Rees has six interceptions plus a few lost fumbles. His sheer yardage (988 passing with seven TDs) is much higher that our totals, but our ability to hold onto the ball makes this even. Edge: Even
Running Backs:
Yes, it was against a severely overmatched team, but against Southeast Missouri State we ran the ball with multiple options. You can take your pick of running back on our squad, but each one brings something different. Ralph Bolden is elusive. Akeem Shavers and Akeem Hunt bring sheer speed. Reggie Pegram is a tough runner. Raheem Mostert and Antavian Edison are slashback receiving types. Brandon Cottom is a beast that is all power. Notre Dame brings Cierre Wood and Jonas Gray. A third of Gray's 279 yards came on one big play last week. Wood proved he was very shifty against us last season and can turn a 3 yard loss into an 11 yard gain easily. I give us an edge mostly because the running game should be our strength more than our passing game, but the ND backs are very capable. Edge: Purdue
Wide Receivers and Tight Ends:
This is where the advantage swings back in Notre Dame's favor. Few receivers in college football are as good as Michael Floyd. Tyler Eifert also showed last week on their game winning drive exactly why I am afraid of him. Given our complete lack of ability to cover the middle on third and long situations I expect Eifert to have a huge day. We'll try to put Floyd on Rico Island, but he is still a big play waiting to happen. Theo Reddick and T.J. Jones also are more than capable second options. On our end we haven't had a receiver stand out as a move the chains type on any given play. Justin Siller has been solid and Antavian Edison can make some moves, but we have nothing close to Floyd and Eifert. Crosby Wright has been a pleasant surprise at tight end, but he is no Eifert. Edge: Notre Dame
Offensive line:
We kept the quarterbacks clean against SEMO, but that was SEMO. Their defensive line is absolutely nothing like Notre Dame's. They have gotten to the quarterback 11 times and we gave up eight sacks against the likes of Middle Tennessee State and Rice. Notre Dame's offensive line has protected Rees well (five sacks in four games) and we haven't generated a consistent pass rush at all. Logic dictates that we should try to run the ball (our strength) and keep it out of the hands of their fast-paced offense. As we have seen from this coaching staff, logic does not always dictate. Edge: Notre Dame
Defensive Line:
Robert Maci has been a nice surprise so far and the defensive tackles are solid against the run. Kawann Short and Bruce Gaston played well against the Irish a season ago, while Brandon Taylor and Ryan Russell are coming into their own. That said, the Irish defensive front manhandled us last season and gave Marve very little time to throw. We can expect to see Darius Fleming and Kapron Lewis-Moore causing consistent trouble when we elect to throw. Edge: Notre Dame
Linebackers:
Joe Holland is a tackling machine and I really like the development of Will Lucas, but once again our weakness is pass coverage, specifically on third down. Notre Dame loves to blitz, and Manti Te'o has been the expected terror with 2 sacks and 40 tackles. He is easily one of the best linebackers in the country. While we have been effective against the run, MTSU and Rice threw all day on us. Notre Dame is giving up over 100 yards on the ground per game and almost 250 through the air, so we should have some success. The teams are just about dead even against the run (2.7 per carry for Purdue and 2.9 for ND), and the pass (6.9 yards per pass given up by ND vs. 6.5 for Purdue) but our own numbers are skewed by the SEMO shutout. Slight Edge: Notre Dame
Secondary:
Ricardo Allen showed what he can do against SEMO when he was challenged on the first play and physically ripped the ball away from a much bigger receiver. That is why I am excited to see what he can do against ND. He was also very effective in a nickel back position over the middle, a new wrinkle I liked against SEMO. Josh Johnson and Albert Evans are also effective tackles, but I still feel the other safety position has been a gaping hole. Logan Link, Landon Feichter, and Max Charlot have to be better against the pass. Fortunately, Notre Dame has not been a rock, either. Harrison Smith is a long-time safety with a lot of tackles, but he's not great in pass coverage. Robert Blanton already has a pair of interceptions to lead the Irish. Gary Gray and Zeke Motta also have picks. If we can cover the middle of the field this should be about even, but we haven't proven we can do that yet. Slight Edge: Notre Dame
Special Teams:
We are blessed with two of the best specialists in the country. Carson Wiggs (when he's allowed to) can hit from anywhere and Cody Webster can punt for 50 yards on nearly every kick. We want Carson to keep kicking out of the end zone for touchbacks because George Atkinson III is a huge difference-maker in the return game. Waynelle Gravesande has been adequate on punt returns, which is good because the Irish have gotten virtually nothing there. David Ruffer is only 50% on field goals and Ben Turk has only a 36.5 average on punts. As long as Wiggs kicks it through the end zone (I don't trust our coverage) and we can protect Webster (will this be the game Gibboney's dumbass protection gives up its block?) We should have a major advantage. We've down 10 of 15 punts inside the 20 so far. Edge: Purdue
Coaching:
This says everything: Brian Kelly would never call the ridiculous timeout that Danny Hope did two years ago. Kelly would also never go ultra-conservative like we did offensively in South bend a year ago. I felt that Hope called a very good game except for the final drive in 2009. Then we went into prevent, they moved down the field, and we bailed them out with that timeout. Kelly has the Irish moving the ball. Once they figure out the turnover issues, watch out. Edge: Notre Dame
Prediction:
My gut tells me we can pull the upset. My heart tells me that a rare night game and two weeks to prepare means we can overcome out talent differential and at least keep this close. My head tells me that if Notre Dame holds on to the ball they will have little problem beating us. This is a very, very good Notre Dame team with only one major flaw. That flaw has prevented them from going 4-0 to start.
In talking with Matt Grecco of SBNation Indiana a few weeks ago he felt that Notre Dame should be favored by about 14, minus seven points for each turnover they make. I think that is about accurate. I don't see us winning this unless we pick off Rees at least three times and force a fumble or two. Should we do that, we absolutely must take advantage of these mistakes. It is also clear to me that our running game works and we should be able to have some success there. That goes hand-in-hand with defeating their offense. It is hard for them to move the ball and score if they don't have it, so we should pound the rock and keep pounding it until they stop us. Their quick-strike offense with the no huddle is very dangerous. We can't allow it to get in a rhythm.
We desperately need an upset to erase the awful Rice loss. I would love for it to come this week and I think it can happen. Unfortunately, Notre Dame is the better team. Unless they beat themselves, like they did in the first two weeks, they should win. Notre Dame 30, Purdue 17
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
" the most frustrating loss in Purdue football history" ?
Sorry, but that should read : “the most frustrating loss in Purdue history for those of us too young to remember even more frustrating losses.”
I will be attending my 51st consecutive Purdue-ND game this Saturday. The game you refer to is in my top five of frustrations, but is not even close to the defeat in 1971, which I have described in some detail in earlier posts.
Let me just say that here is how I feel about ND football: The only time in my adult life that I have ever rooted for I.U. was in 1991, when I.U played ND in football . I always rooted for ND when they played in basketball, however.
BEAT NOTRE DAME!
I have to disagree somewhat
I think we can win this w/out the 4-5 ND turnovers. I think we do need a couple but I believe we can win this straight up. I see ND having 3 turnovers. I think we can force a fumble and get a couple INTs. ND can be a tough team if they can get it together and so can we. I just don’t see this as the week ND does that. WE WILL THOUGH! I think our O Line can hold the ND D Line out. Our O Line is a little underrated. Sure I am biased with my little bro on our O Line but I would think the same if he wasn’t. I think we are gonna get around 175 yards rushing and 330 yards through the air. I agree that Wiggs will have to kick out of the end zone and keep Atkinson III from returning. It will be a tough game and we will have to fight and give all we have to win which I believe we will. The final score 24-17 Purdue. My hatred for ND may blur my vision somewhat but the truth is our Boilermakers can be a great team when they want to be. We have a lot of underrated players and I think after Saturday nights game they will get some more recognition. GO PURDUE! BEAT ND & of course…BTFU!
Tommy Rees SUCKS
and for mostly that reason alone, I predict a Purdue win. 35-27.
Ricardo Allen gets two picks, one to the house. KK Short gets 2.5 sacks.
Ambitious, sure. But this is ND. The players will be mentally prepared, if nothing else.
To your call once more we rally....
Don't mind if I do...

To your call once more we rally....
by BoilerPaulie on Sep 29, 2011 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I can't think of anything clever to say... SOooooo
FUCK NOTRE DAME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by teutonic13 on Sep 27, 2011 5:19 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Is it just me?
Or do I want a win and a crazy atmosphere just so Gary Harris has a good and memorable time?
by Caleb Benner on Sep 27, 2011 7:07 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
How many football recruits (and no I don't consider Harris a football recruit) will be there?
When is Gary Bush’s bro – 4 star recruit Deon Bush coming?
Riley will have an update later this week
As will Andy for the basketball guys.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I believe Deon Bush is coming for this game...
Boiler Up! Hammer Down!
by JuJuan some Moore? on Sep 27, 2011 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Dear baby Breesus,
Please teach Coach Hope the proper use of timeouts over the next 3.5 days.
Makers All?
Dear 8lb, 6oz. newborn infant Jesus,
Don’t even know a word yet, just a little infant and so cuddly – but still omnipotent – we just thank you for all your power and grace, and help us beat Notre Dame.
Amen
>Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
>Don't cry, MSU - It's just a game...
by sea.of.white on Sep 28, 2011 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Something like this?
Dear Lord baby Jesus, lyin’ there in your ghost manger, just lookin’ at your Baby Einstein developmental videos, learnin’ ’bout timeouts and running game management.
or
I like to think of Jesus as an Ice Dancer, dressed in an all-white Nike Pro Combat Uniform, and doing an interpretive dance of blocked field goals.
Ok, ok, enough.
I like to think of Jesus with mustache
Because at practice it says “I want to be serious”, but afterward “I’m here to party”
>Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
>Don't cry, MSU - It's just a game...
by sea.of.white on Sep 29, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Punt Formation
I know Gibboney is a whipping boy around here, and much of it rightfully so. But we really need to quit harping on the punt formation, as it’s really not a bad formation. It’s designed to allow our guys quick releases to get down the field and cover. Tons of teams run this, same formation. It’s not like we just drew it up in the sand or something.
At some point the blame goes to the players for not executing. The 3 back guys are there to keep anyone from getting to the punter. Everyone else holds there guy for like a second and gets down the field for coverage.
Last year vs. MSU one of our back guys looked to the right and stepped in while a gut went around his left. Total bust on our guy. The other punt block that comes to mind vs. Wisconsin can be blamed on both coaching and blocking. Coach should have made the guys aware a guy could try and jump them, but at the same time if a guy jumps and exposes him self our guy needs to react as he now has a free shot at the guy.
Anyways that’s just my take on the punting. Boiler Up!
by Boiler17 on Sep 28, 2011 1:55 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
My problem with the 3 man wedge
Is that you’re asking them to stand still and absorb contact from guys with an 8 yard running start. The degree of difficulty goes up substantially if the defense comes with an all out block. 3 or 4 guys untouched in a race against the long snap. I’d rather put a few more bodies on the line and count on getting a shoulder on them.
Other than the formation decision, the special teams units look drastically better than the last two years. The big question going forward is how those units stack up against more talented return teams.
Lord, jager me strength.
by doublegoldandblack on Sep 28, 2011 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions
The wedge
I hate that instead of blocking a guy, half time time it actually vaults him int he air and makes the block easier. An example was the blocked punt for a TD at Wisconsin 2 years ago. We sent the guy’s hand about 11-12 feet int he air with the wedge!
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
by BoilerTMill on Sep 28, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Wedge
All I was trying to say was I don’t think it’s fair to call our punt formation “Gibboney’s dumbass protection”. The Wisconsin block isn’t exactly the norm, as that’s only happened once. Maybe that was also just an incredible play?
by Boiler17 on Sep 28, 2011 1:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Not when a defender is vaulted every play
Pay attention next time. Almost always we vault the guy up. I am shocked it doesn’t result in a block more often. you never see an NFL use this protection, either.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
We are due to beat these a-holes.
I just Hope we don’t blow it, pun intended.
BTFU
Dosvidaniya, bitches! BTFU!
I heard yesterday this game isn't a sell out??
I’m driving 10 hours up for this one. If we can’t fill the stadium, it’ll be an embarrassment on national TV – something we don’t need any more of in football. I hope all Purdue fans can get some folks out of the woodwork and come support the team on what I perceive to be Hope’s last stand.
by SmallMarketBigPlays on Sep 28, 2011 8:45 AM EDT reply actions
it’ll be an embarrassment on national TV
No one will be watching. The Nebraska-Wisky, Clemson-VT, and Bama-UF games will also be on TV at the same time.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
The attendance isn't the embarrassment I'm worried about.
A sellout to watch a beatdown impresses nobody. If we’re worried about attendance, that means we won, which I’m more than happy to settle for.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Sep 28, 2011 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Considering how much trouble MSU had running the ball against them....
Its hard to imagine Purdue having success in that area.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
My heart tells me that a rare night game and two weeks to prepare means we can overcome out talent differential and at least keep this close.
Yes, but who is doing the preparations? Mr. Hope and Mr. Nord? Uhh, yeah, not an advantage.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Preparations!?! Forget that! You should see us PRACTICE!
![]()
>Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
>Don't cry, MSU - It's just a game...
by sea.of.white on Sep 28, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Disagree: Running backs -Even at best
When doing any analysis the SEMO game should be thrown out. If you do that you see that Purdue’s average yars per carry is 4.46 while Notre Dames is 4.84-edge ND. And yes, with this new calculation we are still outgaining ND on the ground 192 to 152 but that is probably because they have a more balanced offense as they also average 270 yards passing to our 201. Becaus of Purdue’s inbalance offense we run the ball 12 more times a game than Notre Dame. Assuming conservitively that if ND ran it 12 more times they would be able to average 4 ypc on those carries shows that if Notre Dame ran it 12 more times a game their rushing yards per game would exceed 192. (12*(4) = 48+152=200-edge Notre Dame. I realize that our strength is our run game but that does not mean that it is better than Notre Dame’s run game. Unfortunately the strength of this team is pretty average compared to other teams. On top of all of this, all of Notre Dame’s opponents are better than MTSU and Rice and therefore makes Notre Dame’s numbers look even better. I am willing to bet that Notre Dame out gains us in both passing and rushing. Not trying to be negative, but just giving an objective opinion backed by numbers.
Hey, at least we have special teams.
I am skewing our running game
We didn’t run nearly as much as we should have against MTSU and Rice, and when we did run, it was very successful.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Tight game ofen comes down to coaching
In my heart I know we can beat Notre Dame, but my brain is struggling with this. The Boilers won’t blow out ND (can’t evne dream that one) so it will be a close game for Purdue to win and close games will come down to time outs, play calling, proper formations and players on the field – all things tied to coaching which is hard to be positive on that front.
Also, Boilers are going to have to have a solid passing game to compete, it is going to be very tough to just run most plays and I think that Terbush’s playbook is too narrow for this level of competition. Just short passes won’t cut it and he hasn’t done well on the flare passes to running backs so if Marve is ok I think we need him to be the QB and open up the attack to allow our runners so room.

















