2011 Purdue Football: Previewing The Michigan Wolverines
Last week's win over Illinois seems to have revived the fanbase a bit. There is talk of a bowl game, and those plans rely on winning one of the next four games and beating Indiana. That's a good plan, but I also remember watching us crap ourselves at home against the Hoosiers last year. They have just enough offensive firepower (plus Tre Roberson looks pretty good) that we can't just assume we win that game.
So the quest for a bowl game begins in these next two weeks against a pair of difficult opponents on the road. I think everyone agrees that beating Wisconsin would be a major surprise, but even before the season people felt we could beat Michigan. We haven't beaten ranked opponents in consecutive weeks in 11 years, since Drew Brees beat No. 6 Michigan and No. 17 Northwestern in consecutive weeks during the last Rose Bowl season. The hardest part of that equation, winning the first game, has already been achieved though.
Michigan presents an interesting challenge, but one that we can definitely handle. Denard Robinson is like a much better Nathan Scheelhaase. In online trading he would be a hot stock, one that an online broker could to mobile trading for. Both guys are elusive runners. Scheelhaase is probably the better passer while Robinson is the better runner. We held Scheelhaase to 16 yards and a touchdown while sacking him four times. This was a season low rushing for him. If we can defend Robinson as well we have a chance.
2010 Record: 7-6, 3-5 Big Ten
Bowl Result: Lost 52-14 to Mississippi State in Gator Bowl
Blog Representation: MGoBlog, MVictors, Maize'n'Brew, Maize & Blue Nation, The Wolverine Blog
Series with Purdue: Michigan leads 42-14-0
Last Purdue win: 11/7/2009 at Michigan 38-36
Last Michigan win: 11/13/2010 at Purdue 27-16
Quarterbacks
As the Wolverine Blog noted yesterday, Devin Gardner played some against Michigan State, but Robinson is too important to not have the ball in his hand on every play. Michigan State gave us the recipe though, and Ryan Kerrigan did last year as well. You have to go at Robinson on every single play. His passing style is, "throw the ball up and hope a big receiver catches it" as evidenced by his 11:10 touchdown to interception ratio. If you pressure him he will throw picks, but you have to stop the big run from him. On our end it looks like we have settled on Caleb TerBush, and I am fine with that. We're a blocked field goal away from Caleb having two two-minute comeback drives under his belt. He's not going to go mad bomber like Brees, but he is getting the job done with 160 yards per game and a 2:1 TD/INT ratio. He's a better passer than Robinson, but Robinson is the better runner and means a lot more to his offense. Edge: Michigan
Running Backs
Robinson practically is a wildcat running back that occasionally throws. He has 762 yards rushing and nine touchdowns, which is more than most Big Ten backs have. I believe that if you go after him and can slow him down you will stop the Michigan offense. It will be difficult, especially without Kerrigan lurking for him this year, but Michigan State showed he can be slowed. The rest of the Michigan running game is rather meager. Toussaint Fitzgerald (33-4) only averages about 55 yards per game. Vincent Smith (251-2) does even less. We keep working with Akeem Shavers and Ralph Bolden, but Akeem Hunt and Raheem Mostert are dangerous change of pace guys. Don't forget Jared Crank and Reggie Pegram as short yardage guys. We have both quality and quantity here. Edge: Purdue
Wide Receivers
With Michigan you always have to deal with big wide receivers that push around our cornerbacks. The real question is can Robinson get them the ball. I like our chances if we make him throw. First, you have Roy Roundtree, who seems to have made it a personal mission to antagonize us since he decommitted. Hew only has 12 catches for 193 yards and two scores, but he's had big games against us each of the past two years. Jeremy Gallon (20-305-2) and Junior Hemmingway (18-434-1) are good options, with Kevin Koger (12-135 2) as a solid tight end. Our own receivers seem to be coming into their own. We've thrown deep twice in the last two games, completing one to Justin Siller and the other a drop by Gary Bush. Antavian Edison and O.J. Ross are shifty, but need better hands both before and after the catch. I think the Michigan receivers are more talented, but we get the ball to our guys with more regularity. Edge: Even
Offensive Line
Opponents have only sacked Robinson nine times and I feel most of that is due to his elusiveness. Michigan State got him seven times, however, so he can be caught. We just have to go after him. We were successful last year when Kerrigan got him four times, but Kerrigan is gone. Our own line handled Illinois' pass rush very well. We held one of the best pass rushes in the conference to only one sack. Michigan's pass rush isn't as good as Illinois', so I'll give us a very slight edge. Slight Edge: Purdue
Defensive Line
This is where the game will be won or lost for us. Kawann Short was nothing short of beastly last week, and he needs to keep it up. Gerald Gooden had a huge sack that I feel changed the tone of the game, and Ryan Russell was very active. We will not win unless we repeat the same effort this week. Michigan does not get a lot of push from its own D-line. Jordan Kovacs leads them in sacks with three, and he is a safety. He had three of their 11 sacks. Craig Roh is probably their best end rusher, but this team can be run on (145 yards per game). If we commit to the run and have another good day from our D-line our chances of winning go up greatly. Edge: Purdue
Linebackers
The Wolverine Blog pointed out that their linebackers have been awful. Meanwhile, Dwayne Beckford is coming off of possibly his best game as a Boilermaker as we finally had a presence shutting down the middle of the field. Will Lucas and Joe Holland were also solid tackling. Kenny Demens and Thomas Gordon have combined for 95 tackles on the end while Mike Jones is in the middle. These guys don't get into the backfield very much, however, and they only have one interception. Edge: Purdue
Secondary
Rico Island is back and better than ever after Hurricane Floyd. I am willing to write off that game as Micheal Floyd being really, really good. Ricardo Allen did an excellent job against A.J. Jenkins, keeping him in check until late in the game. Now he can play matchup against receivers that aren't as good as he has face recently. He already pick sixed Robinson once too, so I can see him getting another pick this week. I also have to cite Albert Evans as a player that has really come on the past two weeks. Michigan gives up almost 200 yards through the air. They haven't surrendered a lot of points because their stats are greatly skewed from playing three tomato cans in non-conference play plus Minnesota and Northwestern. They have five interceptions from five players and possibly their best corner, Troy Woolfork, is still somewhat limited from a terrible ankle injury last year. Edge: Purdue
Special Teams
I am going to say it. Raheem Mostert is going to return a kickoff for a touchdown this year. It's just a question of when. This would be a good week for it because a kickoff return for a score either negates an opposing score or radically swings momentum. Often times it does both. Michigan averages only 18 yards per kick return and 8.6 on punts with Gallon and Vincent Smith as the primary returners. The kicking game gets an incomplete with Brendan Gibbons only 4 of 6 on field goals. Matt Wile and Will Hagerup split punting duties, but they are no Cody Webster and Carson Wiggs. Edge: Purdue
Coaching
This one is interesting. Danny Hope had probably his best coached game of the season last week. It's almost like he has been trying to overcoach instead of sitting back, concentrating on our strengths, and let the talent excel in those areas. If he does that again It will help. Brady Hoke has improved a defense from awful to merely mediocre. Again, it is really hard to make a call there when five of their seven opponents have been pretty bad and Robinson went crazy on them anyway. If we get good Danny Hope, I think it makes this even. that's a big if though. Edge: Michigan
Outlook:
The game prediction will come in the Big Ten preview tomorrow, but I am feeling pretty confident about this game. Historically Michigan Stadium has been a house of horrors, but it's a factual statement when I say a Danny Hope coached team has never lost there. Maybe we put that demon to bed two years ago when we broke a streak of 43 years without a win.
To me at least, it is very simple what we must do:
1. We have to get after Robinson on every single play and never make him comfortable while containing his scrambling.
2. We have to commit to the run against a team that can be run on.
3. We have to continue getting a solid effort from our defensive line
4. We have to force Robinson to beat us through the air.
If we do those four thing it will be very beneficial.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fixed
We held Scheelhaase to 16 yards and a touchdown while sacking him four times. This was a season low rushing for him. If we can defend Robinson as well wehave a chancewill win.
Lord, jager me strength.
by doublegoldandblack on Oct 26, 2011 8:49 AM EDT reply actions
agree
To your call once more we rally....
by BoilerPaulie on Oct 26, 2011 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions
If I remember right,
Last year was awful, ugly weather for the Michigan game, and the only real bright spot was Ricardo’s pick-6. I’ll be up in Ann Arbor for this one and hope to see us get some vengeance for last year’s debacle and to continue our payback for 30 years of embarrassments in the Big House. This would be the perfect game for Ricardo to get another pick-6 and break our own Rod Woodson’s record in front of 114,000 fans that cherish another great defensive back, Charles Woodson.
Incidentally, I just realized yesterday that this will be the second time since I started at Purdue that I will be going to all but 1 of our football games (2006 missed @Iowa, this year missed @Penn State). That makes me really happy.
To your call once more we rally....
I wanted to go to Ann Arbor this year
I was there over the summer doing research with them. I didn’t want to pay $70 to watch a football game though where I feel like we will probably lose. Oh well, maybe when I’m in grad school I’ll either go to a game there or even go the grad school there.
Kudos on only missing 2 Purdue games since 2006. I wish I could say the same since I started going to Purdue in 2009.
BTFU, HTFD
by btfu_crespo on Oct 26, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
The stadium is cool
They don’t really get up for games that aren’t big. The ND game was crazy, like a Big Ten game at Mackey but with 114,000 instead of 14,000. But against Purdue it will probably be normal. And their students show really poor form; the section is still half empty for a noon kickoff.
I don’t know if you need to spend the full $70, though. Check Stubhub and Craigslist. I got tickets for me and my girlfriend against Western Michigan for $50, but that was Western Michigan, haha.
Boiler Up, Go Blue
by lonewolf371 on Oct 26, 2011 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
I didn't exactly only miss 2 Purdue games since 2006
there have just been 2 seasons since then that I’ve managed to make it to all but 1 of the games in those seasons. good years for road trips.
To your call once more we rally....
by BoilerPaulie on Oct 26, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Meeshegan last year
was the only game I saw in person. Yes, it rained sideways for 3 hours. Neil Armstrong led Shout, which was pretty cool.
Rico’s pick-6 was nice, but what I remember about that game was how Kerrigan, almost singlehandedly, kept us in the game with something like 3 unassisted sacks. He owned Robinson.
"There's no hope until Hope is gone!"
Beast
>Hoosier by birth, Boilermaker by the grace of God
>Don't cry, MSU - It's just a game...
by sea.of.white on Oct 26, 2011 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Great write up. Nail on the head
I went to the last 3 Michigan games, of which we won 2 and could have won the game last year. I was in AA for one of our best games ever and look to repeat that this year.
Things will be different, and to further your post I need to emphasize a few more things we need to do to win.
1) Be physical. Very physical, like we were with Illinois. If we dominate them physically we can overcome some of our shortcomings. This includes solid open field tackling, which is a must against this team. Physical play also needs to take place on special teams. We need to hammer them and take it to them on both kicks and returns.
2) Run the ball, and run tough. Rotate in multiple players as we did against Illinois, and pound the rock. We have the personnel finally and need to punish their D front and open up some play action.
3) Be disciplined. Limit the penalties, especially the game changing 15 yarders. We’ve gotten better the last few weeks, and we need to continue this.
4) Make Denard beat us with his arm. If he gets into the secondary he will torch us. Johnson, Allen, Charlot, Evans, etc are playing well enough to leave in man coverage a lot. Get after their O line and Denard.
Play like Boilermakers and win. I will be there cheering you on.
BTFU
Dosvidaniya, bitches! BTFU!
Seems optimistic
I’m not sure Purdue’s offensive line is better. Yeah you can play the schedule card on Michigan, but the problem is Purdue’s schedule is pretty much identical. You have a few non-conference scrubs, Notre Dame at home, Minnesota at home, etc. Yet, Michigan has allowed way fewer sacks than Purdue, and it’s more impressive if you take out the Michigan State game (and neither Purdue’s defensive line nor Illinois’s are as good as MSU’s).
I’d say the defensive lines are probably even as neither one gets after the quarterback. They’re almost mirror images of each other; Michigan’s best defensive lineman is Mike Martin, a DT (just like Kawann Short).
The improvement of Michigan’s defense from its past #110 to its current #28 has been nothing short of an incredible achievement by Brady Hoke. Don’t give me the stuff about playing scrubs; last year they gave up tons of points to the scrubs, too. I expect it to be difficult for Purdue to move the ball on Saturday, and that’s probably the main reason I’m not as optimistic about this game as TMill is. 2011 Michigan is different than 2010.
BoilerUpAT gave the keys to win. It’s not stopping Denard so much as being really physical with him. You need to push their offensive line back on every play, get guys in his face and knocking him down a lot. Then, his footwork goes haywire and his accuracy will be so bad that he couldn’t hit an aircraft carrier with a football. What you absolutely cannot do is let him get into a rhythm (like Northwestern did). If he calms down, sets his feet, and steps into his throw he’s actually pretty accurate and a very good passer. If that happens, we’re screwed.
Boiler Up, Go Blue
Also, regarding our Offense
The more we have long, sustained drives where we are pounding the ball 3-4 yards at a time with some big gainers sprinkled in, the longer Denard sits on the sideline and watches. He can’t beat us if he isn’t on the field that much.
Dosvidaniya, bitches! BTFU!
I think Shavers is better than Bolden and should get more carries.
Discuss.
by Jackson Brunner on Oct 26, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Durable
He seems more durable. Bolden is still a great blocker, receiver and has that burst. Shavers has every down durability. One really isn’t “better” than the other, but when you have both it sure is one hell of a 1-2 punch.
Remember when Minny had Barber and Moroney. Yeah.
Dosvidaniya, bitches! BTFU!
by BoilerUpAT on Oct 26, 2011 9:41 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
You know what I want to see?
Jared Crank blocking for Brandon Cottom.
What’s the holdup, coach?
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
Limit mistakes and win
We have four (4) guys that have the capacity to break open big runs l. Bolden, Shavers, Mostert and Hunt are all playing quite well, so we need to utilize the depth we have at running back and don’t let them even think about letting up on defending the run.
As for defense, they need to hit Robinson. They need to hit him hard. Make him remember each of those hits. Make him afraid of getting hit.
Rico should have a nice day.
Reaction images? I got 'em
Senior All-American Alto Sax
by Danulas on Oct 26, 2011 12:07 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
This, all day long.
I’ll remain convinced that we won last week by minimizing our mistakes until we have a game where we just blow someone out in stylish fashion. Running to keep the clock rolling was a huge part of that, and I believe it really could be our greatest defensive asset for this week’s game.
I come from a land down unda
If we play as inspired as we did last week....
…I think we can pull this off; however, since this is at Michigan, I’m not so sure. We play terrible there and the Rod is gone.
Few corrections and further info:
“Michigan State got him seven times, however, so he can be caught.” — Robinson was sacked four times (three of them by blitzing linebackers — this was an ongoing problem in the game as MSU’s preparation for the rivalry game from the very beginning of practice got them a ton of free blitzers by timing the snap perfectly). Gardner took the other three sacks, his inexperience showed quite a bit.
Michigan’s linebackers are Jake Ryan (SLB), Demens (MLB) and Brandin Hawthorne (WLB) with a couple others getting time at WLB.
It’s Fitzgerald Toussaint and not the other way around.
Michigan’s O-line is very good in space and pretty good at pass blocking. Less good at pure power plays. Molk is one of the top 3 centers in the country (and Big Ten — Konz, Brewster and Molk are all All-American candidates), Lewan is a future first-rounder but will be playing hurt a little from what it sounds like.
Will Hagerup is a darn good punter. Wile punted the first four games because Hagerup was suspended for “team rules” (no one has reported the actual reason), so they’re not really splitting time, Hagerup has taken the job after the suspension. Hagerup’s average doesn’t look great this year due to a bunch of punts from the MSU side of the field last week that he angled to the sidelines and OOB — you Purdue folks should recall him from his 72 yard punt in the 4th quarter last year to inside the Purdue 5 yard line, a huge play in that game. Michigan’s kicker is definitely not Carson Wiggs though — there isn’t a Michigan fan that has any confidence when they send out the field goal team for anything more than a chip shot (which is an improvement on last year, when they regularly honked chip shots).
by Yinka Double Dare on Oct 27, 2011 2:38 PM EDT reply actions
thank you very much for the updates
A lot of the time I only have stats to go on. Before the MSU game Michigan had two sacks listed, then they had nine given up. hence the 7
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
boiler up!
https://twitter.com/boilerpaulie/status/130276042765123584
To your call once more we rally....
by BoilerPaulie on Oct 29, 2011 9:38 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions





















