Hammer and Rails: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

A way too early look at the Big Ten

Being a blogger, it seems I am contractually obligated to take a look at next basketball season while we are still in the wake of this season. I have already laid down my expectations for Purdue: No less than a National Championship. It won't be easy though. Part of the reason I think we are going to win is that we will be tested throughout our non-conference season as well as the conference season.

The truth is, we may never get another chance as good as next year to win it all. Thanks to the research provided yesterday by the Purdue Basketball Blog, there is little question that we are going to be a preseason top 5 team and Final Four favorite. I feel like karma owes us too for all the injuries suffered this year. A tough schedule doesn't necessarily equal a Final Four berth (ask Butler), but it helps you be prepared for the battles ahead. I also think that the pressure of playing so close to home (as it would have been this year) will be off. It is a crossroads of sorts. If we cannot at least make it to Houston next year with an absolutely loaded team, I'll start to wonder if we will ever make it.

Star-divide

Some have even wildly said we might have a chance at being undefeated. While I do think we're going to have a fantastic team, saying we might go undefeated is a huge stretch. Realistically, we're not going to win at Michigan State, at Ohio State, at Wisconsin, at Illinois, at West Virginia, and possibly at Duke or North Carolina. Can we win most of those? Of course! But to think we win each of those is a stretch even for my optimism.

While I talked about Purdue exclusively last week, let's take a look at the Big Ten. The conference got five teams into the year's tournament, with a sixth right on the edge. I don't think six is a stretch for next season (assuming they have a 65 team field still). If the tournament expands to 96 teams you might even see a record eight. I still think the expansion to 96 is a horrible idea and it cheapens the experience, but whatever. All that matters is what you do once you get there. We're unlikely to be one of the 64 teams that would have to play in the expanded first round, so we would still have to win six games to take the title.

The Big Ten is still going to be a tough conference next year. Few conferences will have our depth and experience, making every game a tough one. That said, here is my predicted order of finish:

1A. Purdue - Right now I think the race begin Michigan State and Purdue is too close to call. We will be experienced and deep, but so will Michigan State. They have an excellent recruiting class coming in, while ours is pretty good. We may not have the instant impact guys that MSU has, but our class will be excellent because it adds the right pieces to the puzzle in terms of support players. Obviously, the big three of JJ, Robbie, and E'Twaun give us incredible experience with two Sweet 16's, a Big Ten title, and a Big Ten Tourney title. The biggest question is JaJuan Johnson. I think he will return. If he doesn't, Purdue will be very, very good and a top 15 team. If he does return, we're a true title contender. UPDATE: GBI posted this afternoon that JJ is still thinking about it. Please join me in sending subliminal messages towards West Lafayette to get him to stay. If anyone is in the School of Aviation and can do one of those signs behind a plane over campus, even better. As for how we match up with the Spartans, my premise from this season stands. Let's just split the regular season and settle things first in Indianapolis for the Big Ten, then in Houston nationally. Postseason: NCAA bid, national title or bust

1B. Michigan State - It is hard to ignore a team that got to the Final Four without Kalin Lucas and with Delvon Roe and Chris Allen banged up for most of the tournament. The bottom line is that no one gets it done during the Big Ten regular season and in the NCAA's right now better than Tom Izzo. In the season wrap from The Only Colors, KJ pointed out MSU's experience over the last two years and how it can carry over. They will be deep and they will be talented. Both games between us should be epic. Postseason: NCAA bid, national title or bust

3. Ohio State - The third champion from this past year is likely losing the National Player of the year in Evan Turner, but they bring in an excellent class. Will it be enough to stay on top? I have heard about DeShaun Thomas for the last four years here in Indiana. He finished 3rd all-time in the state in scoring, becoming only the third player in Indiana High School basketball history to score more than 3,000 points. He was one point out of the #2 spot on the list and within 100 points of Damon Bailey's record. Many people have knocked his defense, however. You need to play defense in this league, and his final performance in high school showed he still has a way to go. Ft. Wayne Luers was heavily favored to win its thread straight 2A championship, but they were knocked out in the first round of the regionals (The sweet 16 game in each class) by Southwood, a team that probably had no business beating a team like Luers. The reason was lazy defense. Had Luers repeated, Thomas may have broken Bailey's record. This translates over the Buckeyes because there is no question they will be talented, but I see Purdue and Michigan State's experience given them an edge. Postseason: Top 4 seed in NCAA's, at least a Sweet 16 appearance.

4. Illinois - I see the Fighting Illini as being one of those teams that defends its home court very well, but can't get the big road win they need to get the conference crown. Virtually everyone returns from a team that had some agonizingly close losses that cost them an NCAA bid. They have an Illinois Mr. Basketball coming in that should fit in quite nicely. This can be a Big Ten championship team with a few breaks. I think to do so they will need to hold serve at home while getting two of three from the above three teams on the road. In my opinion, Mike Tisdale is right up there with JJ in terms of being a versatile center in this league. Postseason: Top 5 seed in NCAA's, Sweet 16 threat.

5. Wisconsin - The Badgers lose Jason Bohannon and Trevon Hughes, but Bo Ryan doesn't know how to finish lower than fifth in the Big Ten. They plug some guys in their spots, most likely Jordan Taylor and Rob Wilson. We know they will defend the Kohl Center like the Japanese on Iwo Jima. We know Keaton Nankivil is good for five three pointers when he comes to Mackey Arena. Beating them will not be easy for anyone in the league. Postseason: NCAA bid, Sweet 16 threat.

6. Minnesota - I'm not sure what to think about the Golden Gophers. Only they and Illinois were so up and down this year. Minnesota took our Purdue and Michigan State in the Big Ten Tournament, but lost at Indiana and was swept convincingly by Michigan. One of the top recruits in the country is still considering them, but he is undecided.  Ralph Sampson III, when he decides he wants to be an offensive threat, is a mismatch for most teams. This is a talented team, but they still lack consistency. Postseason: NCAA bid

7. Northwestern - If Northwestern does not break the NCAA drought next season they never will. The Wildcats were still a threat this year even without Kevin Coble. If the tournament expands to 96 teams I don't see how Northwestern doesn't make it next season unless Bill Carmody does the worst coaching job in NCAA history. A 65 team field might be difficult, but not impossible. The truth is that Northwestern would have made it each of the last two years if they simply could have taken care of business against the teams below them. This year it was getting swept by Penn State and losing at Indiana and Iowa. Think about it. Even against a weak schedule, they are 24-9 and 11-7 in Big Ten play with a win over a completely healthy Purdue team if they win those four very winnable games. How do they not get in in that scenario? Two years ago a loss at Iowa was crushing. The talent is clearly there and the schedule will be tough in Big Ten play. I'm not sure what the non-conference schedule will bring, but If they are above .500 in conference play they should be in. They have more than enough talent to do that. Postseason: NCAA Bid.

8. Penn State - To me, there is a huge gap between the Wildcats and Nittany Lions at this point. Penn State has a chance against anyone because of Talor Battle, but there needs to be something else around him if they are going to be above .500 overall. Still, battle gives them a proven stud and that is more than the three teams below them. This team had no seniors this year, so you can read that one of two ways. Either some experience will carry over and make them better, or the same crappy roster will produce nothing. Postseason: NIT bid at best, if it still exists.

9. Indiana - So now we get to the Hoosiers. A healthy Maurice Creek makes them better. The Big Ten did not get to see him, but he is clearly a solid player. They don't lose anybody of grave importance except Devan Dumes. Where they will struggle is in the frontcourt. Every team in this conference has a serviceable post presence except Indiana. Tom Pritchard took about 17 steps back this year (minus the first half of the Purdue game in Bloomington). Christian Watford and Bobby Capobianco never truly asserted themselves. This is still not a team that has proven it can't avoid shooting itself in the foot yet. Until Indiana proves that it won't turn the ball over and develops a true post presence they will not get better. Postseason: None

10. Michigan - You can probably flip a coin here for last place, because I think both Iowa and the Wolverines  are going to be awful. Michigan was bad this year with two possible NBA players. Both will be gone next year. I give them a slight edge over Iowa because at least they have the same coach. Iowa is starting over (again). Postseason: None

11. Iowa - I like Fran McCaffery as a coach. He did some very nice things at Siena. He has virtually nothing in Iowa City and there still could be rampant transfers. It could be very ugly considering that Iowa's only win over a team that played in any postseason tournament was Northwestern. At least this hiring would have been entertaining for next year. Postseason: None

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Interesting note on Minnesota

Paul Carter announced today that he will be transferring to be closer to his family (his sister was recently diagnosed with cancer). It’s not a huge loss for the Gophers, but it is somewhat significant.

by rcpratt on Apr 7, 2010 2:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Fran McCaffery

With all his ND/Digger connections and now coaching a conference opponent, my disdain for him has fomented extremely quickly.

by Mattdsm on Apr 7, 2010 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Penn State

Lost some starters to transfers. They have Battle’s half brother coming in (maybe) but I think they’ll drop down the list a little, as they don’t have anyone else around to back those two up.

by AustinP0027 on Apr 7, 2010 3:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Expectations....

Shouldn’t we aim for an outright conference title and/or a FInal Four appearance before a national championship?

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Apr 7, 2010 4:20 PM EDT reply actions  

If we win the National Championship

I couldn’t really care less about what we do in the Big Ten. Success in college basketball is measured by Final Fours and national titles. Conference championships are nice, but who gives a crap if you don’t win the whole thing? I don’t think Duke really gives a crap they had to share the ACC title this year with Maryland.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Apr 7, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd would give back 6 Big Ten Titles

If we could have cashed in for 6 Final Fours and 3 National Championships….I think they are going to fight for a Big Ten championship again… but in the back of their minds the big Three has to be thinking Final Four and National Championship… not in a pressure type of way but in a this is our goal. I also see JJ coming back …. just thought I would add my 2 cents into that

by H Dot Jones on Apr 8, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Does anybody know

exactly how it will work in an expanded 96 team tournament? I think it is a ridiculous idea and hope it doesn’t go through, but just in case. I know this article said it doesn’t matter because we’d still have to only win 6 games, but I was thinking it might matter because we may get a more difficult 6 games with a 1 seed if we face a higher quality NIT team instead of the regular 16 seed. Either way, we’re still capable of winning the championship, but I just am wondering who the 1 seeds would face in the first round.

by boilerg on Apr 9, 2010 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

That is a very good question

I just know the top 32 teams, or top eight seeds in each region, will receive byes. I’m not sure how they would do the rest of it.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Apr 9, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

That makes it an even worse idea

You know that the major conference team that are NIT worthy (thus in the last 32 of the bracket) would be in those 16/17 games and the normal 16 seeds would now be 22-24 seeds. Suddenly, your 16/1 game is that much tougher and there is no tru reward for getting a #1.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Apr 10, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya, i was kind of Surprised too...

The number 1 team in the region would face a 16 or 17, but the number 2 could face an 18 and you could say that with a straight face? An 18 upset over a 15 isn’t that remarkable. I really think that they should reorder the seeding after the first round of games so that the top teams play the worst team possible left in the field, and 2nd the 2nd worst, etc. Otherwise you are going to be looking at a couple of 4th or 5th seeds playing 20th seeds quite alot. What happens with a 24-9 upset? The 8th team gets to play them? Just imagine a down Gonzaga team having to face a UMKC team that finished 5th in the Summit league. How much easier could you make the game for them? Then you’d have a matchup like say Duke Vs. UNC (where duke gets punked and the whole world celebrates).

by Jamkel on Apr 11, 2010 4:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the info.

Can’t understand how they think it will be a good idea. I guess they might get more money in the short-term somehow, but long-term they may lose fans. It does seem like it really hurts the value of the regular season and the conference tourneys. If your season is very good and you earn a 1 seed and you get to play a team like, this year for example, North Carolina or Dayton in the first round instead of Lehigh or a normal 16 seed, that would suck. Still winnable, but definitely a more difficult 6 games.

by boilerg on Apr 10, 2010 6:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.
Start posting about the Boilermakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Division Rumors Leaking
Small
OH NO!!!! Dawson to MSU!!!
Tate5ca_small
2010 Expectations for Purdue Football
Small
Tough break for NW basketball
Inxxpu8488_small
State of Indiana Division I Football Predictions
Wha_small
Purdue = UFC
Small
US Defeats Slovenia 3-2. Wait, WHAT!?
Small
Adding East Deck Seats and Permanent Lights to Ross-Ade
Small
Tiller Talking about Proposed Divisions
Parents_weekend__sept
Interview with Cliff Avril

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Florida State's Christian Ponder, left, runs as Miami's Marcus Robinson gives chase during the first quarter of an NCAA college football game Monday, Sept. 7, 2009, in Tallahassee, Fla. (AP Photo/Phil Coale)

2010 ACC College Football Preview: Deep Conference Should Make For Highly Competitive Season

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany speaks in Lincoln, Neb., Friday, June 11, 2010, in front of a Big Ten and a Nebraska backdrop. Nebraska made it official Friday and applied for membership in the Big Ten Conference, a potentially crippling blow to the Big 12 and the biggest move yet in an off season overhaul that will leave college sports looking much different by this time next year.(AP Photo/Nati Harnik) +5 updates

Big Ten Announces Conference Divisions For 2011

FILE - In this Sept. 24, 2009 photo, South Carolina's head coach Steve Spurrier stands with his quarterback Stephen Garcia (5) before the start of their NCAA college football game against Mississippi at Williams Brice Stadium in Columbia, S.C.    A year ago, first-time postseason starter Stephen Garcia got chewed out by South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier for playing video games the night before the Outback Bowl game. These days, Garcia putting all his focus where it counts most _ on the Gamecocks.  (AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain, File)

College Football Kickoff: 2010 Season Gets Underway With Southern Mississippi At South Carolina

More from SBNation.com >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Contributing Author and all-around Good Dude

Avatar_small TelePunk5

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete