Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How A Letter From Tom Coughlin Helped One Fan's Recovery

This is how it’s going down: Big Ten Tournament preview

If you're like me, you love this week of the year. Of course, if you're like me you have a severe basketball addiction and probably need professional help. My addiction runs so deep I covered the Pike-Ben Davis game last night for a local newspaper. It did allow me to see Marquis Teague, and we should consider ourselves lucky we're probably out of the running for him. Teague had a terrible game thanks to Ben Davis' defense, hitting just 6 of 16 from the field. He was held to seven points and four assists before the final minute when Ben Davis was up by double digits and he exploded for seven more. He is incredibly athletic, but his jump shot is awful.

But enough about future recruits. The present is more important as we head into Big Ten Tournament play. I am planning on attending the entire event since, well, it's free for me this year. I might as well enjoy it. Unfortunately, I already know what is going to happen in every game. You see, I have a strange skill. I can confidently pick basketball games. See my initial season projection for Purdue. I called a 27-3 season with a 15-3 Big Ten record. I missed it by one game, but called that we would lose to Northwestern and Michigan State (though I did say we'd lose in East Lansing. My third predicted loss was at Minnesota, so I was close there.

Being right on 28 of 30 games, even with injuries, gives me the unique perspective to call the Big Ten Tournament. My advice to you is to head to Vegas and bet everything you have on these ten games going exactly like this. If I'm wrong, well, that's your punishment for trusting a silly blogger like me.

Star-divide

Game 1: #8 Michigan (14-16, 7-11) vs. #9 Iowa (10-21, 4-14) - 2:30pm ET, ESPN2 - I hate myself for starting to watch Twitter, but J Money provides some interesting tidbits in his banter with the Paint Crew. Last night they were talking about sleepers for the Big Ten Tournament and the Paint Crew picked Michigan. J Money's response: "Appropriate, because the Wolverines have been asleep all year." That should really tell you all you need to know about this game. Michigan is the better team and they still looked awful. I saw they had seven conference wins and I was stunned. Who on earth did they beat, especially with a pair of losses to Northwestern? The fact that Iowa has four wins is even more stunning. The Hawkeyes swept Indiana, got Northwestern once, and I think beat Penn State once. At least Michigan beat a few decent teams. This is probably the least anticipated game of the tournament.

The Pick: Michigan

Game 2: #7 Northwestern (19-12, 7-11) vs. #10 Indiana (10-20, 4-14) - 25 minutes after game 1, ESPN2 - I want to know what sin northwestern committed in order to receive such punishment from the basketball gods. As Sportscenter mentioned last night with the William & Mary loss, the Wildcats are one of just five schools who have always been Division I members that have never played in the NCAA's. Northwestern hosted the first Final Four, so did they throw chicken blood on the court or something? Oregon won the first championship, so did they sacrifice a Duck and angry Oregon fans have placed an everlasting curse on them? There have to be dark forces at work here. No team loses an NCAA bid because they lose to Iowa, Indiana, and twice to Penn State when the path is reasonably clear for them. Think about it. If you reverse those four games (and it isn't a stretch to do so) the Wildcats are 23-8, 11-7 in conference play, and likely secure in the field. They would even have a first round Big Ten Tournament bye, something the program has also never done.

Indiana, meanwhile, showed signs of life on Saturday for the first time since Purdue visited Bloomington. Jordan Hulls shot the lights out and the Hoosiers hung on in overtime. If they beat Northwestern for a second consecutive game a new banner will be raised to declare Indiana the champion of the four worst Big Ten teams. It would also set up a third IU-Purdue match of the season. Indiana has never played Northwestern in the Big Ten Tournament, and they only played Purdue in the first event back in 1998. For ticket sales purposes, I wouldn't be surprised if the Big Ten had a rooting interest in the Hoosiers.

The Pick: Indiana

Game 3: #6 Minnesota (18-12, 9-9) vs. #11 Penn State (11-19, 3-15) - 25 minutes after game 2, Big Ten Network - If I were to debate the Bubble points of Illinois and Minnesota right now, I would pick Minnesota. That said, I don't think either team should be in. Minnesota has finished better, but Illinois has better quality wins. Minnesota gets an advantage in the Big Ten Tournament because they can get an extra win over Penn State before facing Michigan State for a marquee win. Illinois has a tougher road. Unfortunately, I have a feeling about this Penn State team. They are tougher than advertised and they may be playing better basketball than a lot of teams in the conference at the moment. They took on the three conference champs in the last two weeks and took all three games into the final minutes. I am going with them as my (very) dark horse in Indy. Minnesota needs to be punished anyway for allowing Indiana storm the court against them.

The Pick: Penn State

Game 4: #1 Ohio State (24-7, 14-4) vs. #8 Michigan (15-16, 7-11) - Friday, Noon ET, ESPN - We do have Michigan to thank for our new trophy. The Wolverines beat Ohio State earlier in the year, but that was when the Buckeyes were sans Evan Turner. With Turner, Ohio State rolled. Few teams in the conference if any have the talent that Ohio State's starting five has. Therein lies the difficulty with me accepting them as a #1 seed in the NCAA's. They have ZERO depth. At least we have some marginal depth to play without Hummel. If Ohio State loses one guy for one game, they are done. It doesn't even have to be Turner. That will get them past Michigan on Friday, but once Ohio State runs into a team that can wear them down they are done.

The Pick: Ohio State

Game 5: #4 Wisconsin (23-7, 13-5) vs. #5 Illinois (18-13, 10-8) - 25 minutes after previous game, ESPN - Wisconsin just pantsed Illinois in Champaign to end the regular season. That avenged the Badgers' lone home loss of the year from earlier. The Illini needed to have a solid finish in conference play to secure a bid, but couldn't do it. To be fair, they played a brutal schedule at the end. Can they make enough adjustments in just five days to get past Wisconsin? I doubt it. Everyone seems to be sleeping on the Badgers, but they are the only team in the league that beat all three of the tri-champions. In fact, had they not lost at home to Illinois they would have had a piece of the championship themselves.

The Pick: Wisconsin

Game 6: #2 Purdue (26-4, 14-4) vs. #10 Indiana (11-20, 4-14) - 6:30pm ET, Big Ten Network - This is the main reason that I want Indiana to win on Thursday. Any time you can beat a rival three times in one season you take it. I am sure that many of the more delusional Indiana fans would see a two-game winning streak over Northwestern as reason to claim they were back among the elite. Nothing would shut them up faster than a thorough beating by Purdue. Chris Kramer and Keaton Grant were robbed of two career games against the Hoosiers because the Big Ten is too stupid to protect basketball rivalries like it does in football. We need to give Kramer another gift as a Senior sendoff, so beating the Hoosiers again should be it. I am sure the Big Ten and Conseco Fieldhouse would not mind the boost in ticket sales from having the two Indiana teams face off, either.

The Pick: Purdue

Game 7: #3 Michigan State (24-7, 14-4) vs. #11 Penn State (12-19, 3-15) - 25 minutes after previous game, Big Ten Network - It is tempting to pick Penn State here. The Nittany Lions very nearly won in East Lansing last week and they have nothing to lose. Michigan State really has little to gain. They are probably a 3-4 seed right now. They might move up to a two by winning the tournament, but I I have my doubts. For some strange reason Penn State is also a poor matchup for them. I feel like I am trying to talk myself into a Penn State upset here. It seems like some good will is due to happen to the Nittany Lions after last year's NCAA snub. There is also usually at least one first day team that makes it to Saturday too. You know what? I just called it. Talor Battle hits a last second shot to send the fan in Happy Valley into delirium.

The Pick: Penn State (This is my least sure prediction of the ten games)

Game 8: #1 Ohio State (25-7, 14-4) vs. #4 Wisconsin (24-8, 13-5) Saturday, 1:40pm ET, CBS - Remember that team that can wear down Ohio State? You're looking at them with Wisconsin. I think I want Ohio State to lose in order to end this silly discussion that the Buckeyes should be a #1 seed with 7 losses. Of course, I would rather they have that #1 seed than West Virginia. At least if it went to Duke or OSU it would go to a conference champ. Ohio State's depth issues are a glaring weakness that no one is talking about. Wisconsin is the type of team that can get someone like Dallas Lauderdale into foul trouble and force the Buckeyes deep into their bench. Since Mark Titus had shoulder surgery, Ohio State can't even rely on Mr. Rainmaker. This is a big chance for Wisconsin to play their way into a top 4 seed and a pair of relative home games in Milwaukee. If you're the Big Ten and you're only going to get four teams into the NCAA's, don't you want them to be all top four protected seeds anyway?

The Pick: Wisconsin

Game 9: #2 Purdue (27-4, 14-4) vs. #11 Penn State (13-19, 3-15) - 25 minutes after previous game, CBS - Sorry Nittany Lions, but this is where your run ends. Penn State can hang around for a few days because they can shoot the three pretty well. That is enough to grab a couple of upsets, but facing a team like Purdue on the third day would be too much. They would already be fatigued by three games in three days. Now they would have to face a physical Purdue team that can wear them down even further. The first thing to go in that case is the jump shot. With no legs by the second half, Purdue wins going away. It is a shame too. I'd honestly love to face Michigan State in this spot and see what Purdue could do after an extra two weeks and three games to get used to life without Hummel. Remember, that game was still close in the last few minutes even though Purdue looked dreadful. I don't think you get as poor of a shooting and rebounding performance again, but I also don't think you get 23 Michigan State turnovers again.

The Pick: Purdue

Championship game: #2 Purdue (28-4, 14-4) vs. #4 Wisconsin (25-8, 13-5) Sunday, 1:40pm ET, CBS - So here you have it: The conference's two best and most physical defensive teams. These are the last two conference tournament winners as well. Wisconsin won in Madison and came close without Jon Leuer in West Lafayette. The Badgers are a sneaky good team this year. They only have one truly bad loss and that was at Wisconsin-Green Bay. They have improved greatly since beating the Phoenix and they have beaten four teams (Purdue, Duke, Ohio State, and Michigan State) that spent time in the top 10. Purdue can say the same with wins over Tennessee, West Virginia, Ohio State, and Michigan State. Together, these are the only two teams in the country that can boast of four wins over top 10 caliber teams.

I do like Wisconsin in a third game with Purdue though. I'll admit, we were lucky to beat them in West Lafayette and Keaton Nankivil loves to play against us. Getting to Sunday assures Purdue of at least a #2 seed and maybe gets them a #1 if Duke loses early in the ACC tourney, but I still doubt it. Since this would give Wisconsin a 2-1 edge of Purdue this season we must pray that they do not get placed in the same NCAA region as us. I don't think I could bear a repeat of 2000.

The Pick: Wisconsin

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Scary

Frighteningly, this is very close to our thoughts, too. We were too chicken to show them, though.

[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]

by J Money BS on Mar 9, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

11 to the semis, pretty bold.

I’m not quite that bold, but I did have Wisconsin beating Purdue in the finals.

by rcpratt on Mar 9, 2010 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

Was just coming to post that.

And oddly enough, I mirrored your picks on The MSU blog site. I was hesitant with the PSU/MSU game, then I read he was suspended and now I think PSU gets it.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 9, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Great!

Now we just need PSU over Minny. Or do you think losing Allen helps Minny too?

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Mar 9, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope

I think they handle that one on their own.

I have this fear of PSU that I just can’t get past. I see too much improvement in them, especially in these last games to think that they’d lose their first game. Also, given Minnesota’s destruction against Michigan, I think PSU is going to win that game.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 9, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Pat Forde calling upset already...

I am sure this only a sign of things to come from the “experts”…but Pat Forde couldn’t wait to call Purdue an upset victim in Big 10 tourney to IU or NU….

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?columnist=forde_pat&id=4977211

by zaqa01 on Mar 9, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow

He actually ripped quite a few teams in that article.

Pretty much said the Big East is best. Everyone else can suck it.

Not surprising, but I honestly can’t wait until the tourney to see all the Big East teams drop out (with a few exceptions), so they can see the true conference strengths.

Wait until the sweet 16, see who has the most still standing. There’s your choice for best conference.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 9, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't know what it means... just find it interesting...

I was looking at the results of Big Ten vs. Big East games this year, and the Big Ten was 5-2 against the Big East. Conference ranks are in parenthesis, and NCAA tourney teams (projected) have an asterisk.

Wins:
Purdue* (2) beat WVU* (3)
Michigan (8) beat UCONN (12)
Indiana (10) beat Pitt* (2)
Wisconsin* (4) beat Marquette* (5)
Northwestern (7) beat Notre Dame* (7)

Losses:
Ohio State* (1) lost to WVU* (3)
Michigan (8) lost to Marquette* (5)

2010 Big Ten Champs, Baby!

by JuJuan some Moore? on Mar 9, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Now see here

How dare you use “facts” to prove an argument. You’ll never be a real journalist that way.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Mar 9, 2010 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Well...

Like I said… I don’t know if it “proves” anything, I just found it interesting.

2010 Big Ten Champs, Baby!

by JuJuan some Moore? on Mar 9, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess if anything it is an argument for WVU as a 1 seed

over OSU. I can understand them jumping us because of the Robbie factor, but OSU had Turner when they lost to West Virginia.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Mar 9, 2010 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh...

I’m not impressed with WVU. Their non-conference schedule seemed weak to me… they lost to us and beat OSU, but we are really the only two teams that they played. Plus, they lost to UCONN and Notre Dame…

Plus, I was just looking at the Big East rankings… How the hell is Georgetown ranked? And how is Pitt 2nd in their conference… they lost to I freakin’ U!

2010 Big Ten Champs, Baby!

by JuJuan some Moore? on Mar 9, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Boring facts make sense for the boring big Ten

The other conferences have flair, or something. The SEC has SEC speed, even when games end 58-56 because of awful shooting.

Yup, I’ve learned to cringe and know my place as “just” a big ten fan. You can too! It’s easy!

by Beavis Beefcake on Mar 10, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

The usual lip service

Too bad Hummel’s out, etc. and gush, what better way to show it than “look, Purdue’s getting upset.” Sort of a retroactive respect. I think there’ll be a lot of fashionable picks against Purdue, just because it makes smartguys look smart quick, but it’s been that way for a while—we follow a good, but unpopular team.

Whenever Forde is really “hitting his stride” I just go back to this article. It’s therapeutic on many levels. Plus, he chose an unflattering picture of Ashley Judd this week. There’s good judgment for you.

by Beavis Beefcake on Mar 10, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Gary Parrish, eat your heart out

Purdue getting to play IU and Penn State again instead of “quality opponents” would probably cause us to fall to a 5 seed in the minds of most media outlets. Another day of being completely disrespected would be sweet.

by ElijahJones22 on Mar 9, 2010 12:57 PM EST reply actions  

Andy Katz

Speaking of disrespect…Andy Katz dropped Purdue to 17th in his power rankings last week….that seems more than arbitrary….what a joke

by zaqa01 on Mar 9, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

We aren't getting a one seed

Time to give up on that one.

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Mar 9, 2010 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe not

But if we get to the final game (since the game ends too late for the winner to matter) then they do have to seriously consider us. We have a strong record all around, and we would have only lost one game since losing Hummel.

I think you are right, in the end they give it to Duke, but if we make it to the final game, I think we deserve at least a good deal of consideration. Still, a 1 vs a 2 doesn’t matter that much (other than bragging rights). Both are great seeds to have.

Besides….next year we’ll just be one of the “locks” for a 1 seed. You know, before we win the national championship.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 9, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Getting to the final game doesn't do it

I don’t see how just getting to the final game gets us a #1. Winning the Big 10 tournament and either Duke or Syracuse losing theirs is the only path. And even then, it would help if they lose earlier than the final game. WVU winning their tourney could also pass us, which would suck big time.

by boilerdan on Mar 9, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Final game outcome doesn't matter

The final game ends too late for the committee to use in determining their picks. So, the most they can do is see that a team made it to the BT finals. (At least, this is how it has been for a bit.)

I don’t disagree that we could be passed, and yes it relies on other teams not doing fantastic, which is why I said I believe Duke will get it.

Btw, I’m pretty sure Syracuse is a lock already. Given the number of byes that they have, I don’t think a loss in their first game does anything to their seed.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 9, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

My $.02 is this

I think we’ll be good at a #2 seed with a possible decline to #3 seed if we play flat and lose against NU or IU. As much as I want to say that we we have a chance at the #1 seed, I think that’s gone. Shoot they were discounting Purdue as a top 4 team when we were undefeated, then they were “shocked” when we made the run through the Big Ten after starting off 2-3. It was one of those recognition-by-default situations because Purdue forced them to talk about our winning streak. Post injury, our schedule hasn’t given us a chance to truly see the improvement from game 1 ( loss to Sparty @ home) to (hopefully) game 5 or 6 (probably sparty again then, if we win probably Brutus or Bucky). So yes the media will discount our wins as of now. But like COY Painter says, “we can’t control who we play in front of us”, but we can control if we win or lose. Let the media discount us as done. I mean I feel like this is what makes the tournament as good as it is, when experts have so many opinions about a team but then their opinions get proven wrong in 40 minutes. As long as we COLLECTIVELY have a chip on our shoulder and play with intensity we’ll be in the game, IMHO.

by H Dot Jones on Mar 9, 2010 2:37 PM EST reply actions  

As an alumni of a team who is already in the tournament

And already has a share of the Big Ten Title. Why should I care about the Big Ten Tournament? It seems like a joke where the best teams can lose seeding and a good few days by a bad team can make them an also-ran in the NCAA tournament.

I guess it’s all for putting up a banner when it comes to the Boilermakers. It just seems like a banner that represents a 3 game win streak when you’ve already finished with much more impressive conference and non-conference records is pretty worthless.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 9, 2010 3:11 PM EST reply actions  

It is redundant and trivial

But this year, it could prove who was the better team out of the 3 teams that tied in a way-well I guess at least for Pur and MSU if they beat each other and then beat Ohio State. I do agree that entire body of work from regular season weighs more than a 3 day tournament- that is, unless you have lost a key player to an ACL injury and everybody thinks you’re marginal now.

by H Dot Jones on Mar 9, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Remember last year?

We win the Big ten tournament and get “rewarded” with a 5 seed and shipped out west to play Washington. Expect the committee to take what should be our ranked seeding and drop it one. Right now we are ranked 5 If we lose in the first round we should drop to 10 ish which would normally give us a 3 seed but they’ll give us a 4. if we lose in the second round (assuming MSU) we would drop to 8 ish and should hang on to a 3 seed (barely). If we get to the final, I do think we will maintain a 2 seed. I can’t believe they would have the guts to drop us if we accomplish that.

by Hummel's figurines on Mar 9, 2010 3:26 PM EST reply actions  

Unless we're a 5...

We avoid Wisconsin’s region, which I’m grateful for. That’s just seeding rules, for top 4 protected seeds. (I think.) The only way to trump this is if 5 teams from the same conference make it.

As for what NU did to annoy the basketball gods this year, I submit exhibit A: the student section. Chanting “overrated” against Purdue with a minute left, then rushing the court. Contradiction. Carmody would do well to take the student section aside and tell ’em to act like NCAA contenders next year.

I’d love to see us beat iu 3-in-a-row but a loss might put NU in the CBI, which would suck for them. So I have a semi-decent-person reason to root against iu.

by Beavis Beefcake on Mar 9, 2010 4:35 PM EST reply actions  

I want Purdue to make it to the finals

If they can play in as many games as possible before the NCAA tourney that would be best. This team needs a few more Hummel-less games under it’s belt to mesh right before the tourney.

by airnjp on Mar 9, 2010 8:58 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed

If for no other reason, beating a team with a winning conference record without Hummel before entering the NCAA tournament would provide us with confidence.

by boilerg on Mar 9, 2010 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

New Adjective

Hummel-less: adj “To be without a Hummel.”

Yes, given the obsession people (experts) have with Boilers being “Hummel-less” I agree also that playing and winning as many games as possible without Robbie is important.

Robbie is a great player, but he is not our entire team (like a “Turner-less” OSU = Northwestern). Time for E’Twuan to play like he did in first MSU game.

We are not the same being “hummel-less” but we still have some great players, great coaching and incredible team defense.

by Boilers2Indy on Mar 10, 2010 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

TMill with the PSU love!

I really think we have a decent shot tonight. Partly because Minnesota isn’t that good, partly because our first game with them was a 5 point loss (on their court), and the second game was a classic demonstration of how unlucky PSU has been: Chris Babb played perfect defense and Westbrook still hits a 19 foot fadeaway jumper. But mostly it’s because we’re playing well now.

"Based on my estimates, it appears that Stanzi shall transcend the ages." - Cairo

by ReadingRambler on Mar 11, 2010 11:48 AM EST reply actions  

I don't expect us to get any love here...

It’s a Purdue site so I’m not surprised that your pick for an upset of one of the top 4 in the BTT is us. It could happen. Iowa upset us in 2005 and the BTT has never really been a focus of MSU’s program (sure it’s nice to win them though). Izzo has said he wants to win this one, so I’d be lying if I said I didn’t have a little more hope that we win or at least get to the final this year. Best case scenario for us would be, of course, to beat PU and OSU on the way to the title.

The is an informative and well written blog. I have definitely enjoyed reading it this year.

by MSULaxer27 on Mar 11, 2010 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
Scott sets Scoring Record more Recruits 2/4/2012
Motion_p_small
A Big Salute to AAMB Boiler!
Small
Hate week finale
Purdue_logo_small
What IU player have you ever hated the most?
Small
Hate week part 4 - Tom Crean
Fordlogo_small
Drew Brees in Indy
_sey0500_small
2 Things on My Mind
Small
Hate week part 3... time for some lovin'
11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
Simpson Grabs 10 boards More Recruits
G1_kramer_small
Downtown Indy for the game Saturday night!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete

Contributing Authors and all-around Good Dudes

195430_509104334_7314144_n_small HawkeyeBoiler

Osu_gameface_2_small Boiler Bandsman

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small John Wadas

Img_0164_small btfu_crespo

Dasboot_small JordanLegend

Capture_small BoilermkrHero