Hammer and Rails: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

It means frightened and weak-willed

Much will be made about Purdue's home loss to Michigan State today. The mainstream media will quickly point out that Purdue is a different team without Hummel, and this loss is evidence we are done because it would have been a win with Robbie.

The mainstream media will also be wrong.

What we saw today was a Purdue team that failed to step up and embrace the moment. It is one of the first times that this has happened all season long. Only those named Chris Kramer and, surprisingly, Patrick Bade consistently attacked Michigan State on both ends of the floor. Kramer did his usual "creating offense from defense" act, while Bade attacked the glass and ran the pick and roll perfectly on a pair of occasions. His second attempt just before halftime somehow did not yield a foul when a Michigan State player landed on top of him, and the shot itself amazingly spun out after being most of the way down. He played much more aggressively today, and we need that to continue.

The rest of the team, however, played like they were afraid, and we would have lost even if Robbie played.

Star-divide

You regular readers know I call them as I see them. I am not going to sugarcoat what I saw today in Mackey Arena. JaJuan Johnson played like a scared little boy, settling for jump shots and fade-aways instead of attacking the basket. The team simply refused to rebound on the defensive end, leading to numerous second chance opportunities because the Spartans completely outworked us. Mostly, we were afraid because everyone was terrified to shoot the ball for the entire second half. We hurt ourselves by lengthening possessions, wasting clock, and settling for awful shots on almost every possession. It felt like we only scored by accident in the second half. 

Of course, it did not help that the officials made the decision to no longer call any contact whatsoever near the basket on both ends. This made us even more timid. We were afraid to drive because there would be contact that wouldn't be called, yet we were afraid to shoot because we only hit for 30% for the game. LewJack was afraid to finish drives. Kelsey Barlow got freaking raped on a no-call with about 8 minutes left that was a huge turning point. We eventually just gave up on going inside, even though we were having success early on by getting to the line.

There is no excuse to ever shoot 30% at home. There is no excuse to ever get out-rebounded 44-16 at home. There is no excuse to ever lose at home when you force 22 turnovers. Our only consistent offense was in transition. I would say at least half of our 15 made field goals came this way. It was a pathetic effort and quite frankly, Michigan State deserved to win because they came and wanted to put in the necessary work needed in order to win. We did not.

I do not normally say much about officiating, but today it was bad on both sides. I have talked about them refusing to call any contact underneath. They also missed travels left and right, they missed push offs, and they generally had no idea what was going on. It was bad both ways, but it was particularly bad in the second half.

I cannot believe that this team was so callow at home. There was no excuse for it. The crowd was in it. Even at halftime, up 2, I felt we were fine because we were winning a very sloppy game to that point. We just played an absolutely atrocious second half offensively. I credit Michigan State for playing solid defense, but we did very little to take them out of their defensive sets.

I have never been as frustrated with a team as I was when I walked out of Mackey today. I couldn't even speak. All I could think about was punching some smarmy IU fan that is lapping up the fact our season has been derailed. After seeing some of the internet comments from IU fans it disgusts me. I felt sorry for them when they lost Maurice Creek because that cost them probably even more than losing Robbie costs us.

This team now has a choice. We have two games left we absolutely can and should win in order to get at least a share of the Big Ten title, but from there we need to decide if we are satisfied with that consolation prize. We are more than capable of playing light years better even without Robbie, but we need to freaking act like it. The chance at a #1 seed is now gone unless we win the Big Ten Tournament. The outright Big Ten title is likely gone too. It is up to the players in that locker room to decide they are not done. We can still meet all of our goals this season, but we must be willing to put in the work necessary to do so. Today showed we were not ready to do just that.

Then again, it could be something simpler. Maybe we just didn't have it today. There is plenty of time to fix things and we know what needs to be fixed. If we don't shoot 30% today, we win. If we actually work at rebounding, we win. What was off today could easily be working on Wednesday, making this frustration unwarranted. I'll gladly accept being wrong then.

So how do we fix things? One thing I would like to see is moving Barlow to the four spot on the floor and let his athleticism be used near the basket on backdoor cuts and rebounds. Everyone else needs to move without the ball and not immediately pass if they don't have a shot. I would also use JJ for more screen and rolls to get him open down low for easy points. It worked against West Virginia, so it can still work here. The defense is fine, but the offense has a lot of work to do. Finally, I am definitely going to the all caps on this last point:

DON'T BE AFRAID TO SHOOT THE DAMN BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

15 pts and 7 rebounds from Robbie would have been enough...

 Bade “consistently attacking the basket”? Doesn’t do much good if you can’t hit the 2 footer. Bade sucks. He’s sucked all year. 1 rebound in 10 minutes doesn’t do us any good. His ill-advised jumper is not what we need from him. Rebounds and stay out of foul trouble, Patrick. That’s it.

Keaton can’t take 3 shots a game with Robbie out. Jajuan can’t settle for the jumper when he has a definate size advantage underneath. E’Twaun can’t have a bad shooting game.

And we need contribution (points) off the bench. 3 points from 1-9 shooting isn’t going to get it done.

Nice game by Kramer, but he was the only one that stepped up today.

And, really, I could give a rat’s ass about IU fans right now, if ever.

Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team

by carmen_fanzone on Feb 28, 2010 9:25 PM EST reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

Michigan State begged us to win this game. They were careless with the ball, committing pretty stupid fouls (even though they stopped getting called near the end of the first half when Morgan vaulted over Bade), and never managing to pull away, despite the fact that we couldn’t buy a bucket. The worst part is going to be hearing from the airheads at ESPN that “this proves Purdue is completely lost without Hummel.”

I was pleased with Bade, he played better than I expected, and kudos to Kramer for breaking Brian Cardinal’s steal record. Obviously JaJuan and E’Twaun didn’t play well, but I was disappointed most by LewJack to be honest. He seems to be one of the leaders on the team in some senses, and it looked like he was perfectly content to just blend in rather than channel the energy of the crowd and be the floor general that a point guard should be. I just hope they figure all of this out before the Big Ten Tournament. I’m not concerned about IU or Penn State, but they need to use those games to get their shit together.

Hammer and Rails
The only Purdue blog at that web address.

by TelePunk5 on Feb 28, 2010 10:47 PM EST reply actions  

I thought LewJack made some good passes

like the one to Bade right before half, but no one could finish.

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Mar 1, 2010 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

our offense

Our offense is not designed like Michigan State’s where a point guard can hold onto the ball until he feels necessary. We run strictly motion offense, where the ball has to be moved around, even if it means pointless passes to open players that won’t shoot. Besides, do you really think Lewis is mature enough to handle that responsibility?

by Matt Ward on Mar 1, 2010 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't mean to be disrespectful...

But Penn State is better than they were even 3 weeks ago. They have a bit of a rhythm right now. They’ve led Wisconsin by 15 in Madison, tied MSU, stayed close with Ohio State twice, and if Brooks continues to play well there may be something inside.

All that being said, I don’t think we’re going to win, but I do think it could be a tough game for Purdue. Certainly tougher than IU, who is the worst team in the conference as far as I’m concerned.

"It’s just that, reading through this thread, it appears you’re getting your ass kicked." -jtothep

by ReadingRambler on Mar 1, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't see how anyone could draw any conclusions from this game

It was two teams executing poorly, combined with the officials executing poorly. This was just a game that happens when nobody shows up. Purdue was not bad because Hummel wasn’t there. They missed shots that they would have normally made. They threw away passes that they normally would have made. It was just sloppy play, maybe because they were tight trying to replace Hummel, but not because Hummel wasn’t out on the floor. If that makes sense. It’s different in my mind, anyway.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 1, 2010 12:17 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

This was a train wreck of a game. Everything that could go wrong, did. And honestly, I’d say that for both teams. No one deserved to win this one. Neither team earned it.

I think the perfect example of what kind of night it was were the two 3’s that Moore put up that rolled around, practically inside the rim, before popping back out. They were good shots, they just didn’t go in. It was that kind of night.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 1, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

OMG

The rims! The rims! The horror!

Whoever it was that adjusted the rims before that game needs to be sacked. It hurt my ears by the end of the game just to hear a ball hit the rim.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 1, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Good analysis of a very disappointing game

The team can definitely play much better without Hummel.

“The rest of the team, however, played like they were afraid, and we would have lost even if Robbie played.”

Here’s where I disagree, I think if Robbie was healthy and playing, this team wouldn’t have played like they were afraid. Coming off 10 straight wins, I’m sure the team would have played very confidently had Hummel been healthy. Unfortunately I think the leadership and other intangibles Hummel brought to the team were more valuable than I realized. I hope the team learns from this game and steps up, but I agree that it’s a choice they have to make.

by boilerg on Mar 1, 2010 12:29 AM EST reply actions  

My 2 cents

Purdue needed an easier opponent to play in their first game after Hummel’s injury. They were clearly rattled and if there’s one thing you can’t be against the Izzos, it’s rattled. The Spartans impose their will on good teams all the time, so pushing around a rattled team was easy.

Kramer played all right, but 5 turnovers is unacceptable. He took a couple charges and had a steal, so he did some good things, but he MUST take better care of the ball.

Keaton Grant was MIA. I thought coming off the Minnesota game, he’d play well, but that was not the case at all. I still think he is going to finish his senior year on a good stretch but this game was a step backward.

JJ played soft. I was worrying last week that he was NBA bound after this year. If so, that performance should make him reconsider. He looked like a freshman out there. JJ is a good player, but he needs to become stronger with the ball. There were a couple times where MSU players just took the ball from him in the post or on 50-50 rebounds.

I thought Bade played OK. He didn’t look scared and he was active. Obviously he is not an offensive threat, but he was active and that was good to see.

Speaking of freshmen, was that D.J. Byrd I saw out there? Wow, I guess desperate times call for desperate measures.

by Bulldogsmoltz31 on Mar 1, 2010 2:33 AM EST reply actions  

Somebody help me (and Painter).

Mich st. had more rebounds than we had points.

I have questions.

1. Why is Keaton Grant not jacking up open threes? Does he have pump fake syndrom like Byrd and Smith?
2. Why is Lew-Jack playing so much when we clearly need another shooter on the floor? He’s a great on-ball defender, but we scored 44 points and he turned down 44 shots, as he should.
3. Why is Ryne Smith coming in for the first time with 9:00 left in the game? I’m sure he was ready to start shooting then. Not. Would have made more sense for Byrd to come in, he actually took a step on the court in the first half.
4. Why are we trying to slow the game down when we have one center and 4 guards? Makes more sense to slow the game down when you have a size advantage, and can get good shots in half-court sets. Am I missing something here? Are you retarded MP?
5. Why don’t we adjust our defense to try and get more transition looks? I know, we only play 1/4 court man-to-man. God forbid we change up our look for the other team’s sake!
6. Why did Bade play so much in the first half and not in the second? I understand the foul trouble with JJ, but Bade and JJ were on the floor at the same time for parts of the first half, so why not the second? Everyone else seems to agree that he was active and caused the defense to move (unlike 4 guards running circles around the ball, or as they call it: Purdue’s motion offense).

If someone can answer any or all 6 questions I will be very happy. I can’t figure out any of them.

We all know the ‘players’ are better than their performance today showed. Way better. It’s up to the coaches now to put these kids in position to win games instead of embarass themselves because they’re told to do the WRONG thing! Or not given the opportunity period. We learn a lot in the next few games about what kind of Coach we really have leading our TALENTED group of players.

Final Note: With a big win yesterday Purdue could have jumped into the BIG PICTURE for the first time since Big Dog. We fought for recruits for so long. A lot of people (young and old) would have turned their attention to Purdue with a win yesterday. Just saying…
Everyone is excited about the 4 kids coming in next year, but what the hellsinky is Painter going to do with all that talent? We’ll have like 9 guards(Smith, Byrd, Lew-Jack stink but they will play for painter), two awesome forwards(Hale and Hummel), and maybe a center or two, hopefully. I’m drunk with disappointment.

by Matt Ward on Mar 1, 2010 8:02 AM EST reply actions  

" JaJuan Johnson played like a scared little boy, settling for jump shots and fade-aways instead of attacking the basket."

That’s what I’ve been yelling about all season. TAKE IT STRONG! STOP BEING AFRAID OF CONTACT!

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Mar 1, 2010 8:27 AM EST reply actions  

Two straight duds from E'Twaun

3-12 from the floor @Minn and 3-13 yesterday. He’ll find his groove, there’s no way he’ll shoot 24% for much longer.

by BoilerPhil on Mar 1, 2010 9:13 AM EST reply actions  

Purdue is Still Good Enough!

The main stream media is a crock. Look at who they rank in the top 2 spots all the time. Kansas and Kentucky?? The media goes gaga for these 2 teams but what they fail to realize that these two teams play in so so conferences. Kansas has a couple good wins but really what team is the signature win that puts them at a true #1 ranking? And Kentucky, they play in a weak SEC conference so of course they are going to be the dominant team. Except when they play a more experienced Tennessee team on the road. These 2 teams are going to face some pretty tough competition and styles they haven’t faced in the regular season come NCAA tourney time and the outcome for them will be shocking.

Purdue still is an awesome team. I think the loss of Hummel got into the heads of some of the Purdue players yesterday. Maybe it made them nervous? Who knows. But what they need to realize is that they still have 4 awesome starters on the floor and a few quality bench guys. All they need to do is believe in themselves and keep playing the way they are accustomed to playing and they should be fine. In the NCAA tourney they’re going to face teams who they are much better than in the first 2 or 3 rounds anyway. Even without Hummel they should get to the Sweet 16. And even past the Sweet 16 I still believe they have a team that can get into the Elite 8 or even the Final Four. The players need to stop thinking about what the stupid media is saying will happen and go out there and make what they want to happen. Period!!!

Matt

by Phoenixcusefan on Mar 1, 2010 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

Cuse is going to be #1 today

And I agree with what you say about Kentucky, but I do think that Kansas is the real deal.

Anyways, at this point, what the media says is irrelevant. This team needs to figure out how to play and not worry about what people are saying about them.

by rcpratt on Mar 1, 2010 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, but people talk about Kansas being some unstoppable beast. That’s BS! They are just as beatable of a team as anybody else on any given night. Especially when they run into a different style of play they have never played against or are not used to playing against. They are so used to the competition in the Big 12 that when they play a different style, say like a Big 10 team or a Big East team that plays a very good zone, they’re going to get confused and rattled. Watch, they will get bounced by the elite 8 if they play a Big 10 or Big East school. Same goes for Kentucky! They can’t play against a 2-3 zone or a 3-2 zone. They got rattled by it against Vandy and two games before that.

Matt

by Phoenixcusefan on Mar 1, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Rankings don't matter

However, how we play on the court does.

Watching yesterday’s game, I would agree with the media.

Yes, we have talented players, but they were all out there yesterday and they didn’t produce. It’s hard to disagree with the analysts when the team isn’t doing anything to prove them wrong.

I’m not saying that things are over, but the guys on the court are the only ones who can prove that the media is wrong. You can talk about who has played who all day long. With the way we played yesterday, we’re going to drop in rankings, and deserve it. In the end, rankings are just numbers. If we keep winning from now on, who cares if we were dropped to #25.

I have to admit that my optimism about this team has taken a hit after yesterday. I think how they respond on Wednesday against IU can help rebuild it. I’d like to see them destroy this mess of an IU team like all the other Big 10 teams have done recently. Perhaps it was as simple as that they needed a game or two to figure out their new roles. That’s fine, as long as they get it together for the Big 10 Tourney, and especially for the Big Dance.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 1, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

On this topic...

I can’t believe we only fell to 6/7. I wouldn’t have put us any higher than 10.

by rcpratt on Mar 1, 2010 12:39 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I just have one question

OK, maybe two: Who in the hell gave Duke a 1st place vote and where can I get whatever it is they’re smoking?

Lord, jager me strength.

by doublegoldandblack on Mar 1, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Saw that.

Ridiculous.

by rcpratt on Mar 1, 2010 1:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Just a quick thought

Is this team, without Hummel, in our opinion:

Better or worse than the Landry-Teague team that gave Florida a scare?

Better or worse than last year’s Sweet 16 team?

Better or worse than 2000s Elite Eight team?

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 1, 2010 1:04 PM EST reply actions  

barely better, worse, worse.

by rcpratt on Mar 1, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Three things:

First, we may not win another game all year. Hopefully we can beat IU at home. I think winning out the BT regular season is maybe a 35% possibility right now.

Second, you have to put it on Painter if the loss of one key player causes the whole season to go down in flames. We have no front court without Hummel.

If we do lose out, we may not make the tourney. If we do, it may be as a 9 seed or so and purely out of respect.

by bstirrat on Mar 1, 2010 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

Doubt it

If we lose out, we end with 6 losses. (Maybe 7, not sure if tourney counts).

Either way, we’re still in the tourney. Far too many other crappy teams. Yes, our seed would be low..but there are 16 possible seeds in each region, so a 9 seed is roughly half of each region..not close to the bottom.

Either way, I see us winning our next two. Our defense is still just as suffocating. My real concern is how do we do on offense. We should blow out IU. If we don’t, I’ll have concerns.

by AustinP0027 on Mar 1, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Lose out?

Seriously? Against an IU team that’s given up and @Penn St? A 6 man rotation almost beat a much better PSU team at Happy Valley last year.

by BoilerPhil on Mar 1, 2010 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you watch basketball at all?

I only ask because suggesting Purdue might miss the tourney is kind of…. how you say….. ignorant?

[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]

by J Money BS on Mar 1, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

Losing out still gives us a better overall record than every other Big Ten team. That counts for something. The selection committee may be subjective, but they aren’t going to leave out a team with the best record in a major conference.

I'm the first person to admit that I'm wrong about a lot of things, but I'm going to be the last person to admit I'm wrong about what we're currently talking about.

Bolts from the Blue - General Manager: It is what it isn't

by Wonko on Mar 1, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

We're making the tourney

Short of kidnapping the children of the entire selection committee, we’re making the tourney. End of story.

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Mar 1, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey now.

Don’t give the guys at Peegs any ideas.

by RySenkari on Mar 2, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Off the ledge, please.

Purdue:

1) Will not lose to Indiana.
2) Will not miss the tournament. (There’s absolutely no chance of this.)

by LVS on Mar 1, 2010 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Just saying this to clear my mind...

I’m trying to reconcile myself to this possibility

by bstirrat on Mar 1, 2010 2:12 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.
Start posting about the Boilermakers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Division Rumors Leaking
Small
OH NO!!!! Dawson to MSU!!!
Tate5ca_small
2010 Expectations for Purdue Football
Small
Tough break for NW basketball
Inxxpu8488_small
State of Indiana Division I Football Predictions
Wha_small
Purdue = UFC
Small
US Defeats Slovenia 3-2. Wait, WHAT!?
Small
Adding East Deck Seats and Permanent Lights to Ross-Ade
Small
Tiller Talking about Proposed Divisions
Parents_weekend__sept
Interview with Cliff Avril

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Florida State's Christian Ponder, left, runs as Miami's Marcus Robinson gives chase during the first quarter of an NCAA college football game Monday, Sept. 7, 2009, in Tallahassee, Fla. (AP Photo/Phil Coale)

2010 ACC College Football Preview: Deep Conference Should Make For Highly Competitive Season

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany speaks in Lincoln, Neb., Friday, June 11, 2010, in front of a Big Ten and a Nebraska backdrop. Nebraska made it official Friday and applied for membership in the Big Ten Conference, a potentially crippling blow to the Big 12 and the biggest move yet in an off season overhaul that will leave college sports looking much different by this time next year.(AP Photo/Nati Harnik) +5 updates

Big Ten Announces Conference Divisions For 2011

FILE - In this Sept. 24, 2009 photo, South Carolina's head coach Steve Spurrier stands with his quarterback Stephen Garcia (5) before the start of their NCAA college football game against Mississippi at Williams Brice Stadium in Columbia, S.C.    A year ago, first-time postseason starter Stephen Garcia got chewed out by South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier for playing video games the night before the Outback Bowl game. These days, Garcia putting all his focus where it counts most _ on the Gamecocks.  (AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain, File)

College Football Kickoff: 2010 Season Gets Underway With Southern Mississippi At South Carolina

More from SBNation.com >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Contributing Author and all-around Good Dude

Avatar_small TelePunk5

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete