Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

E'Twaun Moore is a bad, bad man

The initial reports of our demise have been greatly exaggerated.

I feel somewhat vindicated this morning because I never gave up on the Big Ten title. The best time to have a three game losing streak is early because you have a chance to erase it. When we were 2-3 in the Big Ten, there were still 13 games left to catch up. We even had two games left against the team we were chasing. To me, there was way too much basketball to be played at that point.

The same is true this morning, where we are currently tied in the loss column with Michigan State, Illinois, and Ohio State for first place. We control our own destiny with a game remaining against each (two coming at home), but a loss this Saturday to lowly Iowa would be as damaging to our title hopes as a loss last night would have been. It is time for us to stay focused and keep playing good basketball.

That said, I don't think there are enough positives you can take out of last night. This was our first road victory over a top 10 team since the landmark win at Wisconsin two years ago. It was our first win at the Breslin Center in 12 years. We topped 1,000 comments on the open thread. It has indeed been a banner week for Purdue and Hammer & Rails, and it is only Wednesday. As someone said last night, who do we attack next? (Kidding!)

Star-divide

Positives from the Michigan State game:

E`Twaun Moore - He is a bad, bad man. I think last night was the best game E'Twaun has played as a Boilermaker. Michigan State did not have an answer for him. A popular theme in the open threads is to call E'Twaun, "the Red Button", as in, "hit the Red Button for instant offense." That was no more evident than last night. With an 18 point lead down to three and the crowd rocking, E'Twaun assassinated any hope of victory with a three play sequence:

  1. Step back dagger of a 3-pointer
  2. Dish inside to Robbie Hummel for a reverse layup
  3. Teardrop runner in the lane

With that, the 3-point lead with four minutes left was back to 10 and the game was essentially over. It also exhibited how important E'Twaun was even when he wasn't scoring. He finished the night with six assists, which means he was involved in 37 points instead of the 25 he scored directly. Steve Lavin consistently mentioned that E'Twaun has to be considered for Big Ten Player of the Year. While I think Evan Turner is the better overall player, E'Twaun has earned his way into the discussion.

The first half - At halftime we discussed if the first half was our best half of the season. I think it is up there with the first half against Ohio State and the second half against West Virginia. Last night was better, however, because everyone got involved. First it was E'Twaun, then we kept pounding the ball in to JJ. Robbie hit some big shots. Keaton Grant was aggressive in getting to the basket. Chris Kramer had a great backdoor layup. John Hart had a big three of the bench. Kelsey Barlow was disruptive. This was a total team effort.

If we are going to have a deep run in March we have to have more contributions like that. part of the reason we struggled in the second half came from going away from the first half philosophy. Robbie was on the bench in foul trouble, we stopped going inside to JJ, and they keyed on E'Twaun defensively. We need guys like Grant, Hart, and Barlow to be threats to score so we can open things up for our Big Three. I also still think  Kramer can be more of an offensive threat.

Offensive efficiency - We shot better than 50% and we had 16 assists on 25 made baskets. All of this came while playing in one of the toughest places in the country to play. It was the first time in almost five years that Michigan State gave up more than 75 points at the Breslin Center. We made it a point to rebound, as our effort was unmatched there. This, of course, makes the Northwestern loss more frustrating, but it was refreshing to see us be aggressive at all times near the basket. In that regard, we made it a point to get to the basket. It wasn't just JJ, either. Kramer, Grant, and Hummel consistently drove to the basket both with and without the basketball. That meant we didn't rely on the perimeter three as much and our percentage from outside was a solid 43%.

Keaton Grant - Keaton had six points last night, all born out of a new attitude for him. He is attacking the basket more and seeking contact. Since his 3-point shot is not falling, that is a good thing. I still feel he is going to have a breakout game like Hart at Illinois.he doesn't have to score as much as he needs to be a threat to score so defenses have to worry about him.

Robbie Hummel - Ho hum. Another quiet 15-5-5 game from Robbie. This came with him on the bench for most of the second half. He had two of the biggest baskets of the night with his deep three before halftime and his reverse layup during the closing run. That is what great players do. They affect games without even playing much.

JaJuan Johnson - JJ came to play last night. It is a credit to our coaching staff for recognizing the mismatch we had with JJ and consistently exploiting it. JJ also played a very aggressive ballgame. Michigan State didn't know what to do with him because his jumper was working and his fall away was even more deadly when they fronted him. I also have to say something about JJ's aggression on the boards. All seven rebounds were huge.

Free Throws - We were 20 of 22 in a tough road venue. That is why I don't understand why we went away from trying to get to the line when Michigan State made its comeback. The Spartans were doing what we needed to do and it was working. Sure, it would likely have extended the game past midnight, but it would have meant for more scoring opportunities.

Kalin Lucas - I know he plays for the other team, but I have to respect the man for hobbling around on one leg and still controlling the game. He willed himself to the free throw line for 11 attempts and was knocked to the ground a lot. This kid is a warrior and has my utmost respect.

Negatives from the Michigan State game:

Closing games - I honestly don't see why it is so hard for us to close teams out. Last night we stopped doing everything that was working while we built the 18 point lead. This has become a disturbing trend where we blow big leads late in games. It started with Ohio State, but we have let Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and now Michigan State back in games when we shouldn't have. Why do I have the feeling this will bite us at the absolute worst time.

Draymond Green - This isn't a negative for us so much as it was for MSU. He was a dismal 1 of 13 from the field. That killed the Spartans. Most of those misses were close to the basket too. If he can fish the play we're in trouble last night.

That Random Player - It started in Madison with Jordan Taylor and has continued in almost every game since. One player on the opposing team performs well above his season average. Last night it was Chris Allen. He hadn't been over 20 points since beating Valparaiso back in November. He only had four games in double figures in Big Ten play with two 0-fers. Last night: 21 points and four 3-pointers. This has to stop.

Offensive rebounding - This is a bit anomalous because rebounding overall was good and we didn't miss many shots, but MSU stayed alive because of a 12-3 edge on the offensive glass.

Next up:

It is a seven game race now. We have three games that we have no excuse losing (Iowa, Indiana, at Penn State), one we should win (at Minnesota, which won't be easy), and three left against the other teams competing for he conference title. If we hold serve at home and take two of three on the road, I think we have at least a share of the title. We should win Saturday at home against Iowa with ease, but we can't look past them. That makes next Wednesday's game in Columbus one of the biggest remaining games of the entire conference season.

Nationally, I think we're solidly in line for a #2 seed as long as we finish at least 6-1. There is a decent chance at a #1 seed, but we would need Villanova, Syracuse, Kentucky, and Kansas to lose multiple games. Of those four teams, I think I'd rather be in a bracket with Villanova because they remind me a lot of Michigan State, only better. They have solid guards, but no interior presence to go against JJ.

That is a little far down the road though. Right now, we just have to keep taking care of business in front of us. That means Iowa on Saturday. We made a nice national statement by dominating a top ten (albeit shorthanded) team last night. That will go a long way towards our overall profile. At least with 20 wins, and many of them "quality wins" we can consider ourselves a lock for the NCAA's even if we unexpectedly lose the next eight games.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Hammer and Rails

Welcome Back, Good Purdue

Feb 2012 by BoilerTMill - 186 comments

Reality Sucks, Doesn't It?

Feb 2012 by HawkeyeBoiler - 176 comments

Advantage: Hoosiers

Feb 2012 by BoilerTMill - 53 comments

Comments

Display:

Syracuse

Be careful! You just suggested it’s theoretically possible that Syracuse could lose!!

[insert prophetic yet obnoxiously haughty and annoying quote here]

by J Money BS on Feb 10, 2010 11:20 AM EST reply actions  

didn’t you give up on the Big Ten title after the Ohio State loss? ;)

seriously, though, hell of a win. johnson dominated that game on the inside on both ends, his presence was most of the reason Green was 1 for 13. I wrote recently that Sims for Michigan was more deserving of the all league center spot than johnson,; a retraction is coming shortly.

by Loretta8 on Feb 10, 2010 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

The boilers

are extremely difficult to beat when he stays out of foul trouble. If a team can get three on him in the first half, we really don’t have much to fall back on. I think a lot of people took Calasan for granted last year, he gave us more than we realized. As a matter of fact, he’s playing pretty good in europe right now .

by droid on Feb 10, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Excellent day!

Our big 3 is awesome and when we play as we’re capable, I do feel like we can beat anybody in the country. I do have a few concerns, however, I think every team has some, even Syracuse. Our bench play is concerning me. Outside of the big 3, we don’t really have a scoring threat. Our failure to close out games already bit us at Ohio State, so I hope it doesn’t happen again. If we can win at Ohio State I think I’ll be able to exorcise that previous game against them.

Irrelevant sidenote:
 
 I never gave up on this team either. In fact I believe we’’re 6-0 since you started one of your blogposts with my comment. Sorry, I just had to say that, I’m feeling too arrogant after beating MSU, hope Purdue doesn’t humble me again the rest of the season! You are right, though, we need to keep taking it one game at a time.

by boilerg on Feb 10, 2010 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

As far as 1 seeds are concerned

Syracuse still has to play Nova and @ Georgetown, and I think UCONN might give them a decent game tonight. Nova has Cuse, Pitt and WVU left. Either Syracuse or Villanova will have one more loss and the potential for more. (As a disclaimer, I’m not saying that Cuse WILL lose any of these, but as the top team in the conference, I can say that every team on the schedule will give you its best effort.)

Kentucky has two games with Tennessee and a surprisingly tough trip left to Vandy. Outside of those 3 games, KY could probably cruise. I don’t think SC has the same magic at Rupp.

Kansas probably has the best shot at a 1 seed right now. They get KSU at home (which could be a tossup), have a road test against an up and coming A&M team and close with a trip to Missouri. With that said, I think someone will have to come up with a big upset to keep Kansas from taking a 1 seed.

On our end, I think it will take running the table and a solid run in the BT tourney. I say why not?

Lord, beer me strength.

by doublegoldandblack on Feb 10, 2010 1:11 PM EST reply actions  

I was just going to add that I think you guys are forgetting the conference tourneys but then you mentioned it at the very end of the post.

Syracuse and Nova have to play each other again and only one will win the Big East tournament. One team could pick up two more losses just against the other. Or maybe they will split. If both teams don’t suffer too much more damage, a trip to the Big East semis should be enough to get either a 1 seed. But not if Purdue, Kentucky and Kansas all win out.

Lots of basketball left. Nothing is guaranteed at this point.

Both the Big East and Big Ten are going to have more than a few bloodshed moments the rest of the way. There are a lot of teams really hungry for wins.

by Syracuse Ben on Feb 10, 2010 3:30 PM EST reply actions  

I have always struggled

to figure out how the selection committee addresses the conference tournament. I feel like it takes a standout performance, good or bad, to shift a team up or down. At the same time, I will admit my knowledge base with regard to 1 seeds is quite limited. I don’t get to dream about it nearly often enough.

Lord, beer me strength.

by doublegoldandblack on Feb 10, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Minnesota Game

As a decent, self respecting Boilermaker in the wonderful city of Minneapolis, I have my ticket for the Feb. 24th match up and I have to say, I’m worried. The first time we played Minnesota, they were without their starting center, Ralph Sampson III, instead facing sophomore Colton Iverson.

I don’t know if it is the biggest deal the first time we played them, but Sampson creates much more of a disruption inside than does Iverson. JJ should be able to deal with him, but I think that every board and lay-up will be contested. This is the one game that has me on high-alert, and Williams is as hard an arena to win in as any in the big 10.

We’ve done what we need to do up to this point, however we need to show we can finish strong.

by MPLSBoiler on Feb 10, 2010 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

Good call TMill

On naming E’Twan the Assassin. He definitely lived up to it last night.

by Zorak84 on Feb 10, 2010 8:20 PM EST reply actions  

Officiating

Was that some kind of record for fouls called? This is the BIG TEN. Way too many ticky-tack fouls called. That said, our guys need to be able to adjust, who knows what kind of officiating we might run into in the tourney.

by DocBoiler on Feb 11, 2010 6:10 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
To The H&R Community, please read

Recent FanPosts

11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
B1G players in the NBA By the #'s
Small
New Basketball Ranking System From ESPN
11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
Painter watches Wideman
Perrycolor_small
Purdue University Memes
Small
Q&A with Matt Painter
11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
2014 will be BIG recruiting year !
Purduecolor_small
Hope's Plan for Quarterback
Small
The Refs Are All Right: Reviewing the Officiating of Purdue vs. OSU
Small
Should we use a big lineup?
Small
It's just demoralizing

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete

Contributing Authors and all-around Good Dudes

195430_509104334_7314144_n_small HawkeyeBoiler

Osu_gameface_2_small Boiler Bandsman

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small John Wadas

Img_0164_small btfu_crespo

Dasboot_small JordanLegend

Capture_small BoilermkrHero