Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

Purdue Football in 2011: A Rebound?

It is December 1st, and Purdue football season is already over for the third straight year. That may not have seemed like much in the past. Even our great teams in the ‘60s went to only one bowl game because of the precious few bids to go around. Now, it is much more embarrassing. Like Boiled Sports said, it is an indictment of the program if you can't get to a bowl game these days. Shoot, Indiana ended up a game short and they even tried to schedule one with that weak non-conference slate.

We have had 13 wins in the last three seasons combined. That was with an experienced fifth year senior quarterback in two of those seasons and a highly touted transfer. In fact, the problems have spun in reverse. We went from having a solid offense and shaky defense to an offense that couldn't score in a women's prison with a fistful of pardons and a defense that has done more than enough for a typical Purdue offense to win. I have never expected our defense to be pitching shutouts left and right. If they can hold a team to 20 or less (especially if the offense isn't giving them poor field position) we should be able to win.

Next year has to end in a bowl game, and that means at least seven wins. The opportunity is there, so let's look at the schedule first.

Star-divide

September 3 vs. ?

I have heard that Middle Tennessee State or Bowling Green are the likely opponents for this game. If it is MTSU, it means we won't have a single MAC opponent for the first time since 1998. Since we like to crap the bed in MAC games lately, that may be a good thing. It is possible this game could be moved to September 17th or 24th to accommodate another opponent. Whoever it is, we need to beat them.

September 10 at Rice

Ironically, 1998 was the year we played our end of this home and home that will finally be completed. This game should still be a win. If we can beat Northwestern (who easily handled the Owls in Houston this year) while virtually crippled we can beat Rice. Like us, they were 4-8 this year with an ineffective passing game. I would say we can move the ball with impunity against a defense that was 115th this year in points given up at 38.5 per game, but we struggled against Toledo, Indiana, and Michigan's shitty defenses.

September 17 vs. Southeast Missouri State

This date could be shifted around due to the opponent to be named. It won't be your typical 1-AA game, either. SEMO is in the 1-AA playoffs this season, just like Western Illinois. There is still no excuse to ever lose to a 1-AA team.

October 1 vs. Notre Dame

It is time to beat the Fighting Irish again. We should have beaten them at least once in the last three years, but we have failed to do so. They have not had the epic step forward as is typical when they hire the latest Greatest Coach Who Has Ever Coached. Their recruiting is leveling off a bit, and there is not the forward momentum that they were expecting. We also get them at home. It is time to beat them again, because there is no reason we shouldn't expect at least a competitive game against them any more. They will continue to be a middling program, so we must have higher goals than hoping to beat them.

October 8 vs. Minnesota

Thanks to the radical changes in the Big Ten we get the gift of a second straight home game against Minnesota. They will also be in year one of a new regime, so it is important that we stay ahead of them. Still, this is a wild card of a game because of their coaching change. Tim Brewster left some talent in Minneapolis. Can the new guy develop it?

October 15 at Penn State

I know we say this every year, but it could be Joe Paterno's final season. I think they have enough left to pull off one more nice run under JoePa. Our one win in Happy Valley was against a pretty bad Penn State team in 2004, and we struggled to get that one. I don't like our chances here.

October 22 vs. Illinois

Now that this is a game we will have every season maybe it can be a true trophy game. The Fighting Illini finally had an average season instead of their BCS or nothing standard of the past decade. If we can come in with an offensive gameplan that doesn't look like it was drawn up by a 1st grader we should be favored at home.

October 29 at Michigan

This game depends on two things: 1. Will the Wolverines choose to field a defense next year, and 2. Will we decide we want to do something against it. We proved that we can play well against running quarterbacks like Denard Robinson. Also, will RichRod be back?

November 5 at Wisconsin

This will be a loss because we can never match them physically.

November 12 vs. Ohio State

This will be a loss because last year's game was a fluke. We didn't even bother to do anything against them this year.

November 19 vs. Iowa

Our new Most Hated Rival comes in humbled after their all-everything season ended at 7-5 with a loss to Minnesota. It even could have been 6-6 if Indiana could catch passes. Now they lose a bunch, so we can take game one in this rivalry.

November 26 at Indiana

We haven't lost two in a row to the Hoosiers since 1993-94. Indiana took 4 of 5 from 1990-94. I think I will break something tasteful if we lose two in a row to them.

As you can see, the schedule is not that overwhelming. Yes, the Big Ten was supposed to be tough this year, but outside of the three champions, it was a bunch of mediocre. 7-5 overall was good enough for fourth place this year. We also held second half leads against two of those three champions. We're not that far away. We just have to answer the following questions:

Quarterback - Above all, we need consistency at the position. The Illinois game proved that. I think, in the end the starter will be the winner of a competition between Robert Marve and Rob Henry. Henry matured late in the year, but lost the last two games on brutal interceptions. He'll get better (right?). Marve was only fully healthy for the Notre Dame game. I think he can come back and have a redemptive season. At this point, I really want the kid to succeed. He has matured off the field and has done everything right in the classroom at Purdue. He deserves to have a solid final year. I predict Sean Robinson will redshirt, as he would have this year, as will Russell Bellomy. Caleb TerBush will possibly be on hand for depth purposes.

Wide Receiver - Part of our quarterback struggles came from the top targets not being there. How many first downs did we lose because of the Keith Smith injury? We never got to see what Justin Siller could do. How handy was the Speed of O.J. Ross when he was there? At least Antavian Edison had a breakout season. All four of those guys, plus Gary Bush, can give us a very good group.

Running Back - This is Ralph Bolden's job if he comes back healthy. I have no idea who will back him up. Al-Terek McBurse has been a bust so far, and they seem intent on moving him to receiver. Doug Gentry, Akeem Hunt, and Brandon Cottom are listed as running backs from our small incoming class. Unless Reggie Pegram improves, one of them will likely get a shot. Jared Crank returns as the fullback, which is good.

Offensive line - First, the good news: Four starters return. Dennis Kelly, Nick Mondek, Peters Drey, and Ken Plue made it through the season healthy and give us a solid group. The bad news is that they couldn't run block for squat against Indiana. Rick Schmeig will probably get the first crack at being the fifth starter, while Trevor Foy and Andrew Brewer could be in the mix. I don't know what to think because they weren't an awful group, but they weren't great either.

Defensive line - You don't get better by losing Ryan Kerrigan, but Kawann Short and Bruce Gaston were great this year. Gerald Gooden disappointed by not taking advantage of all the attention paid to Kerrigan. Someone must emerge as a rush end, even if Antwon Higgs moves down to defensive line.

Linebackers - For the love of God, cover the middle of the field on third down, please! I really like Will Lucas, but it isn't good when experience guys continue to be passed up by younger players. Chris Carlino was pushed out this year. Jason Werner will be gone, but I don't care if we play walk-ons here as long as they cover the middle of the field. And that doesn't mean giving a 15 yard cushion at the snap.

Secondary - We found our answer at cornerback with Josh Johnson and Ricardo Allen. Safety is another matter. Albert Evans is good, but we have to have someone better than Logan Link. On the pyre of redshirts I was shocked that E.J. Johnson didn't have his end up there. I hope it pays off, because I like what I saw from him in all the recruiting videos. Normando Harris could be a more regular answer here too.

Specialists - How will Carson Wiggs fare without his Blurry teammates of John Finch and Kris Staats? Finch was as solid as you can be at long snapper, which will now fall to Jesse Schmitt or Kevin Ballinger. Who knows about holder. Cody Webster had an excellent freshman season punting, plus his mom is the supplier of Yuengling. Jonathan Linkenheimer should be the kickoff specialist as was expected before his injury this year.

Coaching - If we don't make a bowl game it will because of this position. As you can see above, we have a ton of experience back everywhere on the field. Technically, we lose two starters on defense (Kerrigan and Werner), Three on offense (Kyle Adams, Justin Pierce, and Cortez Smith), and no specialists. Also, because of injuries this year, there will be experienced depth behind the starters. That means it lies on the coaches to develop continuity with the players returning.

The schedule is not that hard. The players will be talented. If we don't make a bowl game, then we have our answer about what isn't working.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Defense?

Nice summary, but I’m confused whether you are saying our defense did a good enough job, or just saying IF we had a defense that held the opponent to 20 points we should be successful. In our 4 wins we held opponents to 21, 13, 17, and 17 points. In our 8 losses (it hurts to type that) we gave up 23, 31, 49, 44, 34, 27, 35 and 34. That supports holding them to 20 is the key to winning but our defense is nowhere near that level of play. Our D has stunk for many years. Without going back and looking at the stats I’d say when Tiller’s tenure started its slide coincides with when our D started giving up yards and points that are inconsistent with winning teams. We have got to teach players to cover receivers, our coaches don’t do that today.

by row boilers on Dec 1, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

In the losses, the defense was on the field for a ridiculous portion of the game.

Aside from the two blowouts, most of those games didn’t get out of hand until the defense simply ran out of gas in the 4th because the offense couldn’t stay on the field. Add that to the number of short fields the opposition faced off shanked punts, TOs, and simply losing field position, and our defense doesn’t looks so bad.

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Dec 1, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

In the Michigan and Michigan State games especially the defense was hard-pressed to get a stop when we turned it over in our own territory

A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance

HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog

by BoilerTMill on Dec 1, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

getting off the field

I hear the defense is on the field too long theory for a lot of poor defensive teams. I don’t buy it for 2 reasons:
 1. Good defenses get off the field by forcing teams to punt; we stay on because the other team is gaining yards all the time
2. The other team’s offense is on the field the exact amount of time our defense is. They should be getting just as tired.

by row boilers on Dec 1, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Not true about the second one

you use more energy on defense due to not knowing where the play is going before the snap, so the D has to read and react, going full speed to the ball. Whereas on O you know where its going and not have to go as far.

See Ball, Get Ball. Quarterback Has Ball, Sack Him.

8-19-2010 Hell froze over, Painter has perect passer rating

by 7_Painter's_First_Fan on Dec 1, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Not true on the first count, either.

I don’t have the numbers to back this up, but I’m fairly confident that if you manage to find this somewhere, you will see:
1) A lot of opposing possessions
2) Worse than average field position
3) A lot of points scored in the 4th
Also, we should not discout momentum either. The offense never, ever got anything going, and having to create momentum defensively is almost impossible aside from the occaisional pick-six.

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Dec 1, 2010 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Set the bar higher...way higher

Yes getting to a bowl game is the obvious next step for this program and maybe Hope will be able to do that but being 6-6 or 7-5 and getting some low-tier bowl should not be it. A New Year’s Day bowl should always be the goal for Purdue and I just don’t see that happening under the current regime. Maybe Hope will right the ship next year maybe Purdue will win a few more games. But I really don’t think Hope is the answer for the long term. I hope Coach Hope proves me wrong but I just don’t see it happening.

by 4thandshort on Dec 1, 2010 4:37 PM EST reply actions  

Here's the problem with setting the bar higher...

OK, so you’re not satisfied with where Hope can take us. What’s your solution? Here’s the only other real option… pick up the flavor of the month hire from the MAC that’ll either use us as a stepping stone to a bigger program after we go 9-3 one year, or fall flat on his face. IU fans think they could get Harbaugh to leave Stanford to go to their program… don’t be like those people. We can’t get a marquis name. Hope wants to turn this program around, he wants this job. His first recruiting class hasn’t even gone through yet, at least wait for that before shoving him out the door.

by purwho on Dec 1, 2010 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Hope but a lot of baaaad coaching calls

and poor execution by both defense and offense = bad coaching. I think Hope wants his job but his football IQ isn’t the greatest not for a Big Ten head coach.

Clearly next year is make it or break it for Hope. Yes the team is young and injuries played a part but I thought the team was poorly coached in a wide variety of areas. I doesn’t take a fortune teller to see the writing on the wall in this one.

The thing is it doesn’t take much for a program to go down (see the last few yeasr of Tiller) But it takes a lot to bring a program up. So how long should Purdue wait for Hope to bring it together. Attendence will be down even more next year.

The QB situation killed Purdue this year but even so, many bad coaching calls on top of that.

by 4thandshort on Dec 1, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

To have a good 2011 season Hope needs to improve one thing...

consistency. Inconsistency has been the biggest problem in Hope’s two years, one week its holding its own against MSU and the next week it shits the bed against IU. Part of the inconsistency should fix itself by just having players stay healthy but rest of the problem need to be fixed by Hope. If the inconsistency problem is not fixed by next year, I don’t think Hope will ever figure it but if he does I think he can be a long term answer at head coach. The is no reason why next years team can’t win 9 to 10 games, the only thing holding them back at this point is themselves.

Also I would write this season off for ATM, hamstrings are season killers for running backs. Look at Matt Forte of the Bears and Ralph Bolden second half of last year.

by Kompressor on Dec 1, 2010 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

they were healthy last year and proved they could come out flat. this reoccuring theme is a problem and won’t be fixed.

stop giving injury and youth excuse.

by drboiler on Dec 1, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

 Wow that is really cool you must have a time machine or something to see into the future to know it won’t be fixed. If you could would you tell me the winning lotto numbers for December 10th.

by Kompressor on Dec 1, 2010 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Usually I skip whole sentences....lines.....paragraphs.....

But I read this word for word in pretty mutual agreement. Nice print bro.

by Matt Ward on Dec 1, 2010 5:22 PM EST reply actions  

It could be tough to get 6 wins next year. I see all non-con expcet ND as wins and Minny and IU. Can you imagine the kool—aid drinkers after we are on a 3 game winning streak (as long as they don’t move games around).

Also, in the BoildedSports article you reference, they question DH’s comments about how there is nothing wrong with the current situation.

I wonder if DH and staff are telling this bullsh!t to recruits when they are on visits? I mean the guys will get good educations but if they are giving these recruits a false sense of security on how things really are on then he is just a liar. Sure things could get better but after seeing the performance of the past 2 years, would a recruit seriously want to move into this program? Maybe 5-7 in 2009 and 4-8 in 2010 looks good to a guy still in highschool?

by drboiler on Dec 1, 2010 5:23 PM EST reply actions  

Not to nitpick

but the non-con slate both this year and last should have been 3-1 too, but we shit the bed against two MAC teams and ND. Just another example of the consistency issue.

"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"

by Boiler Bandsman on Dec 1, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Hope for Hope

I really want Danny hope to succeed. It may be tough to replace TEs Adams and Lindsay now that De’Ron Flood is gone. It was good to see Carlos play well at RB but disaapointing to see his career limited by injuries. If he had been used at RB last season and Cortez Smith utilized earlier at WR, could Purdue have won another game?

I thinkt the OL could be much better with another year of experience for Mondek, Foy and Schmeig, the departure of Pierce and the addition of RS tackles Davis and Deboef. Cody Davis could challenge Drey at Center.

by admandon on Dec 4, 2010 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We've gone Off the Tracks with Hammer & Rails. Follow on Twitter via HammerAndRails.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small
Antavian Edison expected back.
Small
Updated Scout 2013 rankings
Small
Marcus Ball and Marlon Jones
Small
I hate to talk about them again, but what is going on at IU?
Missouri-state-coach-cuonzo-martin-celebrates_small
Bad Fit, Julius Mays???
Screen_shot_2012-05-18_at_10
Relegation in College Football
2974180163_b71d9efa12_b_small
Julius Mays commits to Kentucky
Purdue_pete3_small
Mays visiting Purdue this weekend
N13747840_45642847_3893164_small
Kendall Stephens Footage
11954337581357827998skeleton_friend_afief_02_svg_med_small
Weekend Update on Recruits

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Author/Editor/Founder/Dictator for Life

P1070915_small BoilerTMill

Purdue_basketball_small Purdue_Pete

Contributing Authors and all-around Good Dudes

195430_509104334_7314144_n_small HawkeyeBoiler

Osu_gameface_2_small Boiler Bandsman

N13747840_45642847_3893164_small John Wadas

5_students_who_small btfu_crespo

Me2_small Banski913

225900_10150176999314580_500129579_7023532_1645468_n_small BoilermakerMadey

Good_lookin_small Slandrey