Signs of improvement?
I was a tad confused walking away from Ross-Ade Stadium today. Purdue lost by 21 points. The margin of victory was not surprising, even though we did beat the spread. Still, I felt very satisfied with the result. I even told Mrs. T-Mill that I was surprisingly upbeat for having witnessed a 21 point defeat. Perhaps it is the mark of just how bad things have gotten with our football program. Perhaps it is a sign of improvement. I'm still not sure.
If you had come up to me before the game and told me, without knowing the final score, that Purdue would be down only seven points with the football and less than ten minutes remaining in the game I wouldn't have believed you. For one half of football today Purdue looked as good as it has looked all year while playing one of the best teams in the nation. Through more than three quarters we still had a legitimate shot of winning a game that many thought would be a 30-40 point blowout.
I guess we can call that improvement?
This team looked epically bad the last two weeks. We managed 10 points last week against a defense that gave up 67 today. Sure, we only had 13 points, but we outgained an opponent that was light years better than us. If we hadn't given them 24 points directly off of turnovers (while negating at least three since we were in field goal range on the fumble) this possibly would have been a win. Two of the picks were a result of tipped passes, not bad throws by Sean Robinson. There were enough positives from today's game to think that maybe this season isn't quite over yet.
Badgers vs Boilermakers boxscore
Positives from the Wisconsin game:
Sean Robinson - He will get better. I kept saying that as I watched the rookie make his way through his first start. The overall numbers weren't pretty (19 of 38, 141 yards, 1 touchdown, 3 interceptions) but they were better than last week. The passing game was at least a threat, especially with Antavian Edison. Naturally, the game was a little rough with some true freshman mistakes, but given the opponent and the situation I though the rookie did very well. Two of the picks were balls that hit his receivers' hands and popped up, therefore not his fault. He still locked onto one receiver and stared him down on many plays, but even this changed some by the fourth quarter.
Has he exhibited himself enough to be anointed the starter the rest of the season? I don't know. He's thrown a better ball than Henry and even had a deep look or two. He is dangerous when he does decide to run, getting a few first downs too. The fact that he at least gave us a chance to win is enough. He'll learn from today.
Antavian Edison - Edison was our best receiver by far and was very shifty after the catch. We need to continue to get him the ball in space, as he had several chances to break runs for even bigger plays.
Al-Terek McBurse - At least we saw some signs today of the player we expected him to be.
Dan Dierking - Today was another example that Dan Dierking does more with less than anyone else on this team.
The defense - This loss is certainly not on them. Wisconsin was in position to score and did after all four turnovers. The rest of the time we contained John Clay and got hit far less on big runs than last year. Most of that came from fantastic blocking by their offensive line for Montee Ball. Kawann Short and Bruce Gaston were especially good on the interior.
Of course, a number of other guys can be singled out. Ryan Isaac had a great sack and fumble that could have turned the game if we had recovered it. Will Lucas was all over the place. Albert Evans had a nice interception. Even Gerald Gooden got some nice pressure on Scott Tolzein. I don't think we could have asked for a lot more out of the defense today. They did what they could do against poor field position for most of the afternoon. they were good about gang-tackling and pursuing the ball. Both will be necessary next week.
Negatives from the Wisconsin game:
Dropped passes - it wasn't quite as bad as last year, but the receivers could have really helped Robinson out with a few more catches today. Two of the picks were on the receivers, especially the pick-6. If those drops can be fixed and made catches next week against the awful Michigan defense I like our chances.
Penalties - They killed at least two drives and cost us the ballsy onside kick to start the game. They weren't big, but they were still costly.
The defense with one minute left in the first half - Once again, we handed an opponent three points before halftime (and momentum) with the prevent defense a minute before the half. Combined with the slant being open over the middle, I shouldn't be surprised at this point.
Up next:
I can't really take many other negatives from today. As bad as we have looked, we moved the ball with regularity and pushed a much better team for more than three quarters. We were 68 yards from tying the game when Robinson's second pick happened, and it only got out of hand after that pick and the pick-6. Could you ask for more knowing what we knew coming in?
There was more than enough here to give us hope next week. As long as our defense can slow down Denard Robinson and Roy Roundtree next week I know our offense can move the ball. Our offense should be able to move because everyone has gained yards on Michigan this year. Even the authorship can hang 30 on them next week. All we need is a week of practice, and we (the Boilermaker Heroes, Mrs. T-Mill, and I) gameplaned at Harry's and Lovshack after today's game.
Michigan gave up 315 yards rushing today, including 100+ to a freshman quarterback like Rob Henry and Robinson. We can expect the same if not more next week. As long as we can pass too, and we should be able to, the yards will be there. If we can replicate today's defense we have a chance, and that is all we need. Write it down: I guarantee we beat Michigan next week. If anything, we have an even better chance since they have the pressure of getting win #6 off.
More importantly, we kept fighting today. We came out and played like we had nothing to lose. We ended up scaring the bejesus out of a very good Wisconsin team in the process. The Badgers weren't sure what was going on at the half. All we need to do is keep it going and come out with the same fight next week minus the correctable mistakes. I don't care how it happens, as long as we get two wins in the next three games (against two beatable opponents) we're going to a bowl game. Even Michigan State is a possible win if we play like we did today minus the turnovers.
It is nice to have hope again.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The two fourth quarter picks
Those were both bad throws, not horrible throws but they were both just a tad too high for both Cortez and Adams. It was bad breaks that they both bounced to Wisky DBs.
Night and Day
Biggest positive? Our guys looked prepared. These Boilers came ready to play today.
The kids were amped up and flying around the field. More importantly, the playcalling demonstrated to the kids that the coaches were willing to take risks and had confidence in the players’ ability to get it done.
Onside Kick to start the game? Hell these are the same coaches that recently opted not to go for it on 4th and 1 deep in the red zone and, instead, sent in the “Hooked Field Goal” play.
I have no idea what was done differently during the week, but I like the results. I hope to see more of it next week as I will travel from Georgia to spend an autumn Saturday in Ross-Ade for the first time in six years.
Losing still hurts, but it’s been a long time since I felt “we’re still in this thing” butterflies in the 4th quarter vs a Top 10 team (I missed the OSU game last year). I’d much rather see our guys willing to leave it all on the field in a loss than step onto the field unprepared, untrusted and ready to do nothing more than lay down for a shithammering!
Boiler UP!
Agreed.
I haven’t been so satisfied with a loss in a long time. That first half was well played and I am excited how well the team was prepared for this game. So amped up we jump offsides for an onside kick? Too bad, this team was ready to play. That was apparent from the word go.
The freshman QB came out after a while, as was to be expected. But, call me crazy, but I think he looked like Elliot out there at times. Give him some reps, and I think he will be pretty good.
I like what I saw today, regardless of the score. We can win 2 more games.
Dosvidaniya, bitches! BTFU!
We lost, it’s okay. The optimism thing is good, but when will be the next game PU comes out flat? Should we be thinking about that or should we be happy we lost?
According to the quotes from Wisky coach after the game, they were not worried, and were doing what they planned to do. Eventhough PU seemed like they controlled the game, wisconsin had the win secured. They dialed in on our offensive ‘game plan’ easily after half time. I think we have another curtis painter QB that will look at only 1 receiver.
I too was pleasantly surprised.
I felt dread when I turned the game on today but came away pretty happy. I really liked the fire on defense and Dierking.
T-Mill what are your thoughts on next year with the QB situation? We will have gotten good real game looks at three guys by the end and they are all back. Do you think Henry and Robinson have a leg up on Marve? Who would you choose between the two of them? Or will Hope stick with “his guy” when the season opens?
It's a trick, get an ax
I'll probably wait until after the season to post
So far, I think Robinson shows the most promise. It is a lot like last year, when Elliott was the presumed starter, yet we could have gone with TerBush. Robinson is the better passer than Henry and I can see his maturity growing mid-game. Henry will ahve a role ont his team, but I can see him having a position switch I was a little surprised we didn’t see him at running back today.
Marve is a wild card though. I can see not playing him at all in the spring game, thus making things very interesting heading into fall ball. It is his last shot, but how much do we try him? He’s a lot like Nate Costa at Oregon: a ton of talent, but injuries really derailed him.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I don't see this as a positive loss at all.
I saw a team that came out and grabbed a lead against a good team, and then did nothing at halftime to try to improve. We came out, ran into Wisky’s adjustments, and had no idea what to do. The result: we lost the second half 28-3. Sure, we caught a couple of bad breaks, but still, did anyone in the stadium feel like we were ever a threat in the second half? We were not ready for their adjustments, and that’s on the coaches, esp. Nord and Hope.
Also on the coaches is asking a true frosh to throw the ball 38 times. That is just stupid no matter what, and we had a lead for half the game, too. Have we forgotten those 200 yard rushing games? Sorry guys, I just don’t see it. Robinson of the Denard variety is going to go nuts on us, and the IU game will be a cripple fight.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Nov 6, 2010 11:47 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yep...
Defense showed some life yesterday, but we still can’t score to save our collective lives.
We had a good half. I guess you could say we build on that. But, once again, we were blown out. No positive to that at all.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Nov 7, 2010 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
I can’t tell if I should be encouraged by the progress it seemed like we made in this game, or depressed that I’m encouraged by losing by 21 at home.
Purdue didn't cover the spread
Wisconsin was favored by 20, and won by 21.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Once again our band was better
During the 1st half, I had never heard Ross-Ade Stadium so loud in the last 2 seasons (well maybe the Ohio State game too, but for it to be that loud that early after our performance the last two weeks was impressive). I felt like we saw the 2009 Football team again, a team that could have won the game but turnovers plagued them and cost Purdue the game. But I am also optimistic about next week’s game against Dick Rod. Michigan got its 6th win yesterday against Illinois in the offensive showdown, so they won’t be coming into Ross-Ade desperate for their 6th win. However, their next two opponents after Purdue are Wisconsin and Ohio State, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the Wolverines come in trying to make a statement so they don’t play in a bowl game a few miles from their campus.
Michigan/Indiana
Frankly I don’t care if we get to a good bowl game, or ANY bowl game – if we can go 6-6 given all the key personnel injuries I’d call that a major victory.
I watched Michigan/Illinois. Michigan’s defense is High School bad. Hopefully DickRod will keep his DC another week. Purdue removes two interceptions because of inept receivers and the Wisconsin game is totally different. Receivers and Robinson got a GOOD game under their belts – I am optimistic about Michigan.
Michigan State? Loss. Let’s move on.
Indiana has a certain magic for giving just enough to stay close and then get their hearts torn out.
Next two games are at Wisconsin and hosting Penn State. That’s two sure losses, so they won’t be playing for a bowl berth. Even if they win ONE of those games and have five wins coming into West Lafayette, I doubt any bowl would take them with just two conference victories. So they’ll be playing just for pride – of which they have none.
If we can push around their offensive line like I think we can, really rattle their QB, it could be another pasting. Every game I’ve seen them play this year – even against the division 1-AA’s like Western Kentucky – they run out of gas pretty early in the fourth quarter.
That’s the only game I’m going to – traveling 8 hours – and I think when push comes to shove, Purdue will have its way with Indiana, as nature always intended.
That’s six wins in an ugly ugly injury filled season.
Moral victory?, man times are tough.
Hey lets give all the purdue players helmet stickers for the loss against wisconsin on saturday! great game guys.
FYI, there are some highschool defenses that could have stopped Purdue many times this and in past years. So that really does not say much.
IU held a good Iowa team, but maybe Iowa thought IU would be a push over. They could easily hold our offense. Can we score enough points to play with Michigan? Look at Purdue’s PPG versus Michigan for the 2010 season to date. Last year it came down to a wire and we feel like it was a Rose Bowl win.
I could call it improvement, but it's not enough to get me excited
This only looks good compared to all the bad If a 21 point loss after being up at halftime is an improvement, then that says something about the state of the program. Michigan beat a team that destroyed us. That doesn’t give me confidence that we’re going to beat Michigan. Now I hope I’m wrong and that we beat Michigan and IU handily, but I could only base my hopes in pure fandom as there is no evidence on the season that we are capable of winning both of those games.




















