Know thy Opponent: Virginia Tech Hokies
Defend That, Digger is on hiatus this week. The bandwagon carrying the Big Ten crashed and burned, killing 127 people in a fiery death off a cliff thanks to the new love for the ACC and Big East. We don't even have Indiana to make fun of. The Hoosiers are undefeated and starting to look like a competent basketball team again. They even get Boston College in the ACC/Big Ten Challenge, which is basically like playing a Special Olympics team at this point.
Our beloved conference has done very little to benefit us of late:
Virginia 87, Minnesota 79
Connecticut 70, Michigan State 67 (vaulting the Huskies to #7)
Richmond 65, Purdue 54
Notre Dame 58, Wisconsin 51
UTEP 65, Michigan 56
Long Beach State 78, Iowa 72
At least Richmond, Notre Dame, and Connecticut are good teams. The rest are bad, bad losses, topped off by Minnesota gacking at home just as they jumped way up in the rankings.
That is what makes tomorrow's visit to Virginia Tech so important for us. We have given the national media a reason to write us off by playing like they expected us to play against Richmond. Sure, it may not have been a win even with Robbie Hummel because of the shots we missed, but the issues of a stagnant offense and poor rebounding were there. Against Virginia Tech, we have a chance to put these arguments to rest on a national stage.
The Hokies are the toughest game left on our non-conference schedule. Since the regular season is all about playing for a good seed in the NCAA's so you can have favorable matchups it is the closest we have to a must-win game this early. We're #18 in the highest poll right now. People will lose in front of us over the next several weeks, while we shouldn't lose another game in December if we beat Virginia Tech. The time is here for us to make up ground toward that coveted seed. A good performance on national TV against a good team will be a major boost and erase some doubts created by the Richmond loss. A good run by the Spiders would also help.
2009-10 Record: 25-9 (10-6 ACC)
Postseason Result: Lost to Rhode Island 79-72 in NIT quarterfinals
2010-11 Record: 4-2
Blog Representation: Gobbler Country
Series with Purdue: Virginia Tech leads 2-0
Virginia Tech started the season in the top 25, but has lost games to Kansas State and UNLV, who are both pretty good teams. I did some chatting with Gobbler Country via text on Sunday night and they were not as confident as some of the media in this team. Essentially, he said they had the same team as last year. That team was just on the wrong side of the NCAA bubble. In fact, they likely would have been in had the new 68-team field been in play. I guess that makes them perfect for us to play since some people think we're a bubble team at best.
They have a three-headed scoring machine of Malcolm Delaney, Dorenzo Hudson, and Jeff Allen. Delaney is a dynamic guard that is a lot like E'Twaun Moore. he shoots better than 45% from long range and he is averaging better than 20 points per game. If we still had Chris Kramer, I would love to unleash him on Delaney. Like E'Twaun, Delaney creates shots for other since he averages almost four assists per game.
Hudson is a big guard at 6'5", but not nearly the 3-point shooter that Delaney is. His scoring is down four points per game from last year. He could be a trouble for us to handle because of his size. Allen, at 6'7", is their main post presence and leading rebounder. He can step outside and shoot the three, however, with 32 made 3-pointers in his career. After these three, the scoring drops off significantly.
This is a game where we need to rebound better because we will have an advantage in the post. Even with Hummel, I saw us having trouble this year in games where we couldn't rebound. My dream scenario with a healthy Hummel was with the Travis Carroll, Sandi Marcius, and Patrick Bade troika contributing as rotating RRD guys. So far, that has not been the case, and it makes Hummel's loss even more glaring. Coach Painter does not trust them yet, and as someone in the comments said, we simply need one of them to step forward and play like a Division 1 post player. Otherwise, we have three Tom Pritchards. Bade has disappointed and played timid. Marcius is solid, but still reckless. Carroll is a rebounder, but he lacks the strength and experience he needs. It frustrates me because we need them on the floor gaining experience, but they have been liabilities when they have been on the floor. Even with Hummel we would struggle if they continue to play as they are playing now. With Hummel, we would still need them to do more than they are doing right now.
Virginia Tech ranks 238th in the nation in rebounding. They are also 208th in assists at 10.8 per game. These are areas where we have shown we can be dominant in the past. I don't care that it came against the poor competition of the first five games. The fact is that it was there. It has been there before, and it can be there again.
Against UNLV Delaney had 30 points, but the Runnin' Rebels beat Va tech because the Hokies only had 25 rebounds and Hudson was a non-factor with no points. The Hokies also shot 42% from the line in that game. They are just 65% from the line on the season, and they have more turnovers than assists.
This has to be a win for us. We're the better team, and we're only getting bashed because we happened to have our worst half of the season in our highest profile game against our best opponent. This is our chance to show that we can turn things around.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Flying down to Blacksburg in a few hours!
I’ve watched most of VT’s games this season and from what I’ve seen, they’re really not good at all. Delaney can score but he turns it over a ton and doesn’t seem to make his teammates better at all. The important thing is going to be containing Allen.
This would not be a good loss. And I will be angry. Please win.
ESPN "Experts"
8 out of 9 have Purdue losing this game…which I like…the same 9 “experts” all had Minnesota winning (although I can’t blame them for that one)
Close to a must-win
I really believe with Hummel we would have crushed the Spiders, but yeah they were at least a good team.
Don’t know much about Va Tech, but I do know we need to win this game or else we are going to have to stop complaining about not getting any love in the national media. I too think we have been a little slighted since Hummel went out, but if we lose this one there won’t be much to argue about at that point until we play another good team, which won’t happen for awhile.
"Must win" ?
Who gives a fuck if the media’s back on our side again or not? We play better with a chip on our shoulder…
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Nov 30, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions
Chill Out Dude
Obviously it’s not a must-win in the strict sense of the word. Winning this game will help with seeding at the end of the season as well.
by Boylemaker88 on Nov 30, 2010 10:45 PM EST up reply actions
That's why it is must win
losing this game costs us at least one seed in the NCAA’s. Winning it raises us at least one, maybe two because of its profile.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
WAY too early to make that determination.
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 1, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
Obviously, you shouldn't use the term "must win" then...
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 1, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Apologies
If you’re going to over-analyze everything, the title says “close to a must win”. Which means, it’s not a “must win”. Obviously.
T-Mill got a guestion.
How is Richmond a good team when tehy lost to Iona in 2 OT and they beat Purdue at Mackay? They beat the only ranked team they play all year.
I think it is a bad loss for Purdue, because their non-conference schedule is less tougher than it was last year.
about Richmond
They didn’t beat Purdue at Mackay and they didn’t beat Purdue at Mackey either. They beat Purdue on a neutral court in Illinois. If you watched the game, you saw them out-hustle, out-rebound, and out-shoot the Boilermakers. Purdue’s lack of front court depth was exposed. Where is our “most improved player of the offseason”?
re: sparty retardy
It wasn’t in Mackey. There was no home-court advantage – no one was there. Richmond, by most accounts, will be a tournament team – and would of been even with a loss to Purdue.
Your comment is less smarter than it needs to be
wow...aggressive stance.
I am just wondering why Purdue is playing a cupcake schedule in 2010.
by spartynation on Nov 30, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't call it totally cupcake
Richmond and Oakland were tournament teams last year. We go to Va Tech and West Virginia, plus host Alabama (who has played like crap)
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
Don't feed the trolls...
Pride comes before the fall…
by DTownBoilermaker on Nov 30, 2010 10:57 PM EST up reply actions
Bigs
We had a huge size advantage against Richmond – that Painter decided not to exploit. Same situation with VTech. Let’s hope Painter takes a Tums and gets over the young big’s mistakes and lets them play. I vote Marcius gets as many minutes as he can until he fouls out. Then put Bade in to do the same thing…
Totally agree
Why in God’s name is Painter holding these guys back from getting good experience. So what if Sandy gets a 3 second viotion. He won’t learn to NOT do it until he plays in some games. Let’s use the BigTen pre-season as a pre-season and freak about blowing out every team we play against. DJ Byrd cannot be our starting PF in BigTen play. Besides, Sandy has shown some good things out there (not sure about Bade). And Carroll has huge promise already. Ugh, it is frustrating.
by OverdueBillsFan on Nov 30, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
The frustration with the other two bigs might be that they weren’t doing anything offensively. I mean, play wise.
Every time it came down the court, they both posted up under the basket on whatever side the ball was on, essentially leaving a defender covering the middle freely. The 3 second violation was a prime example that they were just standing down low, posting up. They clogged up the middle, and I’m sure that can’t be what Painter envisioned.
I agree, get them some playing time, but also, figure out what to do with them. JJ can’t do anything down low if they are down there the whole time. If that’s the game plan, fine, but I have a hard time believing that they should just stand down low the entire time on offense. Maybe that’s their fault, maybe it’s Painter not giving them a clear idea of what our big guys should do when two are in the game at the same time, but either way, something needs to be figured out before we can move forward with two of them in the game.
Picks
I’m actually pretty high on Painter, but you just hit on one of my other gripes about his teams thus far. The offense relies too heavily on it’s motion components and we have zero emphasis on picks.
Even when we try them they are absolutely terrible. JJ often sets a high (phantom) pick and rolls high rather than low.
I think the bigs are worth the court time simply to get rebounds and commit hard fouls – i.e. that the offense won’t suffer that much with them doing nothing. But if they are going to do something it should be as perpetual picking machines. That should keep them busy and out of the lane.
yeah, not much to talk about football-wise here.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
I'm about to puke
If we dont kick the corn out of Vah Tech I’m gonna be shiddy.
I hope John Hart
Get’s to start…I think he deserves it with as an offensive threat and a good defensive player.
Purdue looks to bounce back from its first loss of the season on Wednesday when it squares off with Virginia Tech as part of the 2010 ACC/Big Ten Challenge … The Boilermakers are 3-6 in nine Challenge appearances, but have not won a Challenge game on the road … The Boilers also head into Wednesday’s contest looking to win their Challenge game in back-to-back years for the first time … A win on Wednesday would also be the Boilers’ first over the Hokies in three tries … Purdue is 26-21 (.553) following a loss under head coach Matt Painter … Purdue is 29-10 (.744) under Painter in the month of December … Wednesday’s contest should prove to be a physical affair, as Purdue and Virginia Tech average 19.0 and 21.3 fouls per game, respectively, on the campaign … Purdue has won the turnover battle in each of its five victories this season, and head into Wednesday’s game with an average of 12.0 and an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.5 on the year … The Boilers are +4.8 on the boards and have outrebounded four of their six foes this season … Senior guard E’Twaun Moore exploded for a career-high 31 points against Southern Illinois on Nov. 26 and needs 17 points to eclipse Cuonzo Martin for 11th on the program’s career scoring chart … Moore is averaging 23.5 points and 9.0 rebounds per game in his last two outings … He should also break into the top 10 on Purdue’s career minutes chart versus the Hokies, and is on pace to become the first Boilermaker ever to reach the 4,000-minute mark for his career … Senior forward/center JaJuan Johnson has posted four double-doubles in six outings this season, including three in a seven-day span in the Chicago Invitational Challenge … Johnson needs just one block to become the second player in school history to swat 200 shots in his career … He also became the 20th player in program history to reach 600-career rebounds against Austin Peay on Nov. 23 … He is one of five players nationally with 1,200 points, 600 rebounds and 100 blocks in his career … Just six games into his senior year, Moore ranks fifth in program history in games started (108) … Purdue is 50-7 (.877) in Johnson and Moore’s careers when both score in double figures … Seven different Boilermakers have drawn starting nods this season … Seven different Purdue players have turned in a double-figure scoring performance this season … The Boilermakers have been hot from the perimeter in the early going, shooting at a clip of .380 from beyond the arc and making at least seven trifectas in four of six games … Purdue will also look to continue the offensive efficiency that has resulted in 111 assists on 172 field goals this season … Four Purdue players are averaging at least 2.0 assists per game on the season … Junior guard Lewis Jackson has dished out at least five assists in three games this year, and needs two helpers to reach 200 for his career … Sophomore guard/forward D.J. Byrd has tallied 16 assists and just three turnovers in six games … Sophomore guard John Hart enters the contest as the Boilers’ third-leading scorer (9.3 ppg), having posted double-figure scoring totals off the bench in four of six games this season … The Boilers have scored at least 76 points five times this season and won 27-straight games when scoring 70 or more points … The Boilermakers rank fifth in the nation in adjusted defensive efficiency with a mark of 86.8 (kenpom.com) … Purdue currently owns a +7.17 turnover margin and is outscoring its opponents by an average of 11.8 points per game off of turnovers … Purdue is 46-1 (.979) during Painter’s tenure when it has earned the edge in both the rebounding and turnover battles … Since the beginning of the 2006-07 season, the Boilermakers have forced their opponents into an average of 16.7 turnovers per game and limited foes to an 0.70 assist-to-turnover ratio.
Did you write that from memory?
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Dec 1, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions



















