Fixing Purdue Football: How to salvage something in 2010
I know we're all frustrated and disappointed with how the last few weeks have gone. For me, the Toledo loss is still burning because that should have been win #5 that we need before facing Indiana. That fifth win looks highly unlikely at this point given the schedule ahead, but that is no excuse to totally pack it in this season. Even with the personnel we have left we can still somehow squeeze out one more victory before the Bucket game. All we need is a plan, and a little positive luck that is long overdue.
Now I am not a football coach. I have never even played a down of organized football in my life. The closest I have ever come to contributing on a football field came in high school when I was 5'7" 130 pound athletic trainer that nearly got taken out on a sideline play. That said, some of this stuff is just common sense at this point. It was clear on Saturday that we have no real offensive direction or identity anymore. Major changes are needed even if we go 0-4 the rest of the way just so we have something positive going into next year. I don't even think a coaching shake up (Except for J.B. Gibboney) is necessary.
These are just one man's thoughts, so feel free to add your own in the comments.
1. Commit to one quarterback - Even if Rob Henry was healthy, quarterback platoon never work. Look at 2002, when we struggled because Joe Tiller kept switching between Kyle Orton and Brandon Kirsch. There needs to be one voice under center. If Rob Henry can't throw, then put him at running back. Don't have him taking snaps if he's not even a threat to throw the ball. That's stupid. It's like holding up a sign that says, "WE'RE RUNNING ON THIS PLAY".
As long as Henry can't throw, the quarterback needs to be Sean Robinson or Justin Siller. Robinson is still very raw, but I think he is a better passer than Henry when healthy. If we can gameplan with him and make the passing game even a remote threat it will be a step forward from the Illinois game. With Siller, you have a legitimate threat to beat Michigan. I say this because Michigan fans are terrified of him. Is it really a bad thing if we give him a week of practice as the #1 guy, then start him against the Wolverines? Right now it seems like me, TelePunk5, BoilerChuck, Mrs. T-Mill, Purdue_Pete, Boiler Bandsman and the Boilermaker Heroes could throw up 30 points on the Michigan defense if given a week of practice. Siller only had a week of practice the last time he played them, and won Big Ten Offensive Player of the Week from it.
I have never been an advocate of just mailing in a game, but I don't see us beating Wisconsin short of a case of explosive diarrhea confining the Badgers to the locker room. The most likely game for win #5 is the Michigan game, and we probably need to approach it that way. Preparing the quarterback position for that game is paramount.
2. Play Al-Terek McBurse at running back - This has become a very frustrating point for me. Coach Hope has complained about how injuries have limited us at running back, yet McBurse has played late in the last four games. That tells me he is healthy. He is averaging 9.8 yards per carry and is a big-time recruit. Play him. If we can get a definite backfield of McBurse, Dan Dierking, and Henry we can move Antavian Edison back out to receiver. Keith Carlos and Jared Crank are already back there too, which brings me to my next point.
3. No more moving receivers to the backfield - Since Antavian Edison and Cortez Smith are our only two healthy receivers left they need to stay there. Under this plan, Siller moves to quarterback with Edison and Cortez as the top two receivers. From there, we need to find others that can catch the ball. Gary Bush, Xavier Reese, Tommy Thomas, Gabe Holmes, Kyle Adams, and Jeff Lindsey came to Purdue to do just that. It's time for them to do so.
4. Bench the starting safeties - Since they are nowhere to be found on deep passing plays, it is time throw someone else in. Throw E.J. Johnson's redshirt on the bonfire of redshirts if he can be more effective. He was a ball-hawking safety in high school, so how could he be a worse option than Logan Link whiffing in coverage? I know Albert Evans is hurt, but surely we can try someone else, right? Ishmael Aristide and Chris Quinn are still on the roster, correct? We have absolutely nothing to lose by trying someone else.
5. No more musical punters - The thing that pissed me off the most about Saturday was the way we handed them three points before halftime. We did so by pulling Cody Webster (who had kicked a 45 yard punt into the wind before) and doing the odd rugby-style punt with Carson Wiggs. The result was good field position and an almost sure three points for the Fighting Illini that nearly turned into seven. I don't know who made this choice, but it was dumb.
6. Have two guys key on Denard Robinson on each play - Again, I am pretty much conceding the Wisconsin game. The Michigan game needs to be a win, and we need to have two players follow Robinson on every play. He is their one consistent offensive threat at the moment. Go after him on each and every play whether he actually has the ball or not.
I know this is hardly an ironclad plan, but at least it is a plan. It seems like more than we've had the last two weeks, anyway.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
McBurse can't run unless he's got a giant hole to run through
and last time I looked, our O-line wasn’t exactly blowing big holes all over the place. He runs on his tiptoes in traffic and is a fumble waiting to happen. That said, he’s better than breaking any more of our WRs by putting them in the backfield. Throw some screen passes to a RB once in a while too, not to a WR(which is how Hope\Nord got Smith busted up).
"Any player who gets the opportunity to play at Wrigley should welcome it"
ATM is not Eric Dickerson
Good observation however as an Oliner – If I’ve got to blow that big of a hole for him to feel comfortable then I’ll run it myself (slow as molasses but at least I am moving forward). Saw a few replays and there was enough space for him to drop his hips and shoulders to explode through. I agree lets run him and give him an opportunity to succeed. Additionally, I too would like to see him swing out of the backfield like Brees and Bush.
While you're right
about the authorship being able to light up Michigan, it wouldn’t matter. Our linebackers don’t have the gap discipline to stop Robinson or the speed to stay with him on the edge.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Nov 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions
It's not even about gap discipline
You just tell two guys to go hit him on every play regardless. If he has the ball when they get there, deliver, if not, stop. It’s not difficult to understand.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
But Robinson
can bounce it outside, and if you just charge after him, you get sucked into the line. It’s all about discipline, not just the linebackers, but the entire defense. I agree that they need to TRY to gang up on him, I just don’t expect it to work.
"Hey Jay, what time is it?"
"9:30"
"AND IU STILL SUCKS!"
by Boiler Bandsman on Nov 1, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I couldn't agree more, T-Mill...
Seems like one plan devised by the blogging community is better than the 4 different plans that we seem to be trying all at once. Im not good with X’s and O’s and its pretty evident that we have few other options that are working.
Undue Purversity
Look to the future
While Siller may or may not be able to salvage this season at QB, I think the rest of this season needs to be building experience for the next few years. I agree that we need to settle on a starter and quit playing musical QB, but I think the decision needs to be made between Robinson or Henry, since they are going to be the long term future of the team.
I totally agree with everything in the article TMill. Musical positions needs to stop during the game – sort that crap out in practice.
I heard that Robinson only attempted 25 passes his entire sr. year of H.S. If that’s true, that’s incredible…
BTFU!
You really think Henry or Robinson are close enough for next year?
I’d rather just have Siller start this year and next if he does well, and then Henry/Robinson (who the heck knows what’s going to happen with TerBush now) will be Juniors and hopefully will have learned how to throw a ball by the next year. You can’t always be looking ahead.
I think they could have been
If the coaches hadn’t thrown all of their eggs in the Marve basket and tried to develop Henry and Robinson as well. I know they would have liked to kept Robinson’s redshirt and weren’t expecting him to see the field. I do think though that if you picked one as the starter for the time being and gave them both some pretty heavy reps in practice, that they would develop quickly. I think they’re both talented guys, but some of their struggles probably have to do with timing with the receivers and the inconsistency in personnel packages.
I wonder how effective Siller really would be now. We can look back at the Michigan game, but that was more of an exception than the norm for him.
BTFU!
Yeah, Siller had a great game against UM but then lost 21-7 against MSU (on a last-minute TD by Siller). His stats from that game were horrible.
by SpartanBoiler on Nov 1, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Well yeah, it's not going to matter against MSU or Wiscy this year.
But I think Siller would be a huge swing against Michigan’s terrible defense. I don’t think we can muster anything even on their awful D with Henry/Robinson, but Siller could run wild…and actually pass.
I hate the obvious running plays with Henry.
By the end of the game it had me remembering the days of Dorian Bryant. Anytime he motioned into the backfield, he might as well have said while in motion “sup D, we’re running the option on this play.” I don’t remember a single time we didn’t. Of course, the obvious difference was that we actually gained yardage a few times that way.
Like was stated, Michigan and Indiana are the two games we at least have a chance in, but tbh I’ll be surprised by any win from here on out.
There's only one problem
with your points. How do you get the coaching staff to implement them?




















