Facing a team that Battles every night
There has been much hilarity this morning, preventing me from working on the Penn State preview. First, you have Mark Titus and his special brand of jockularity. It is unfortunate the guy's career may be over, but if he does come back to Indianapolis after graduation I know of a church league he can play in.
Second, you have this, found on the intarwebz by Mrs. T-Mill. It is something the sports marketing department definitely needs to think about for our next Ross-Ade entrance video:
He blew up the earth! To quote The Tick, that's where I keep all my stuff!
Seriously, does it get any better than a polar bear in a fighter jet that can blow up the entire earth?
What does this have to do with Penn State basketball? Absolutely nothing. It is basically an excuse to share some funny stuff with you readers. As for tomorrow's game, there is no excuse for us to lose it. When you're on the short list of teams for the Final Four you simply cannot lose at home to winless teams in conference play.
2009-10 record: 8-12, 0-8 Big Ten
2008-09 record: 27-11, 10-8 Big Ten (won NIT)
Blog Representation: Black Shoe Diaries, Happy Hour Valley, Nittany White Out, Run Up the Score, Nittany Line, Glory of Old State, Linebacker-U.com, We Want the Lion
Series with Purdue: Purdue leads 22-10
Last Purdue win: 3/13/09 at Conseco Fieldhouse 79-65
Last Penn State win: 1/6/09 at Penn State 67-64
Clearly, last season was a much better season for Penn State. A 10-8 record in the Big Ten was not good enough to get the Nittany Lions into the NCAA Tournament even though they won at Michigan State and beat Purdue at home. A late loss at Iowa was probably the difference maker there, as was a loss to Purdue in the Big Ten Tournament. I am not going to disparage their NIT win, however. Yes, it was not a national championship, but they got the job done and won a pretty tough tournament. I commend them for doing only what they could do.
This season has been a virtual disaster from the beginning with only Talor Battle being a consistently good player. In a preseason tournament at Charleston, South Carolina they lost games to UNC-Wilmington and Tulane. They also lost at Temple and at home to Virginia Tech. Their best win so far was likely the 69-66 win at Virginia because it allowed the Big Ten to win the ACC/Big Ten Challenge. Other than that, Penn State has beaten no one.
In Big Ten play, Penn State has only been close to a win twice. They lost by one at Illinois and three at Iowa. To make matters worse, they only play Indiana and Iowa once, and they have lost both games already. The Nittany Lions are a legitimate threat to go 0-18 in the Big Ten. They have just five home games remaining against Michigan State, Minnesota, Purdue, Northwestern, and Ohio State. My gut says they pull off one game at home to avoid the 0-fer, but I really don't know who it would come against.
As mentioned, Penn State is basically Talor Battle and no one else. Battle is a great player on an awful team. He averages 19.1 points, 5.4 rebounds, and 3.8 assists per game. He leads the conference in scoring, is one of its best 3-point shooters, and is in the top 10 in assists. Sadly, he leads Penn State by a large margin in nearly every category. It is never a good thing when you 6' tall point guard is your leading rebounder.
That is not to say Penn State is a bad rebounding team. They actually rank fourth in the conference as a team and they average nearly 12 offensive rebounds per game. When you shoot 43% from the field it leads to a lot of rebounds though. That is what makes Penn State's struggles so perplexing. In looking at the numbers, they are in the middle of the conference in nearly every statistical category. They just don't score enough, averaging 66 points per game and ranking ahead of only Iowa in that category.
Outside of Battle, there is no consistent scoring threat. 6'5" sophomore guard Chris Babb is second in scoring at 8.6 per game, but he is inconsistent. He had 18 this week against Illinois, but didn't score at Iowa a few weeks ago. David Jackson (8.5 ppg), a 6'7" forward, is the same way. 6'8 junior forward Jeff Brooks (7 ppg) is the only other player that averages better than six per night.
One caveat for Penn State is that it has a very young team. Battle, Stanley Pringle, and Jamelle Cornley were the heart and soul of this team last year and everyone else did very little. The Nittany Lions now do not have a single senior on their roster, and no depth was developed to replace the 27 points per game that Cornley and Pringle took with them when they graduated. It is really a worse situation than two years ago when they had Geary Claxton. At least Claxton had Cornley and Battle for help. Battle this year has nothing.
That is why this should be an easy win. We have had a habit recently of giving up 20+ points to an unexpected source. Jordan Taylor, Keaton Nankivil, Demetri McCamey, Zack Novak, and Jason Bohannon have had career nights against us of late. Who will it be in this game? Will it be Tim Frazier, who is shooting 43% from 3-point range but only averages 5.7 points per game? It is disturbing that we have been known for our perimeter defense, while teams are shooting a Big Ten best 37.2% from long range against us. To make matters worse, we're only better than Michigan at shooting the three ourselves. That tells me that if we ever figure out how to defend the three and hit it ourselves we will be even more dangerous.
For Penn State to win they will have to have a tremendous game from battle and get unexpected contributions from everyone else. In that regard, I say we just concentrate on guarding the other four players on the floor. Let's dare Battle to pull an Iverson and score 50 to beat us by himself. My money says it won't happen. It is nice to have a game where we should be able to work on things that need tweaking rather than pushing really hard to win.
Keys to the Game for Purdue:
- Limit contributions outside of Battle
- Work on defending the perimeter
- They rebound by committee, so boxing out is critical
- Get Lewis Jackson back into the flow of the game
- Dare Battle to beat us single-handedly
Purdue 77, Penn State 62
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Should be a W
Make sure to wear Black for the “Blackout” if you are going to the game. Boiler up!
Excellent point
John said in yesterday’s Boilermakings:
Blackout Mackey; This Sunday’s game against the Nittany Lions will be a Blackout game. From a charity standpoint this will be a great game. Fans can purchase an official Blackout shirt to wear in Mackey. For each shirt, $1 will be donated to both the Purdue Center for Cancer Research and Coaches vs. Cancer. Of course you could always wear this if you like cancer. In addition to the Blackout, Painter and the coaching staff will be wearing sneakers as part of the Suits and Sneakers cancer awareness campaign.
A futile crusade to prevent mass ignorance
HammerAndRails, SBNation's Boilermaker Blog
by BoilerTMill on Jan 30, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
I've read this over and over and still can't figure out what it means...
Of course you could always wear this if you like cancer.
Typo? Forget a word?
Nobody cares about your fantasy baseball team
by carmen_fanzone on Jan 30, 2010 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
Penn State's Possible Home Win
I think Penn State pulls of the upset over Minnesota. They aren’t going to beat Purdue, MSU or Ohio State, and I think Northwestern has too much to play for to let that win slip away. Meanwhile, Minnesota has been pretty inconsistent this whole year. If Penn State is going to catch anyone on a bad night, I’m guessing it will be the Gophers.
I am going to stab somebody if...
MSU doesn’t lose at LEAST one of their next two games. @Wisc, @ILL. Come on now.
Penn State has struggled because:
As you say above, Battle has gotten no help. Players like Jeff Brooks who averaged 3-4 PPG last year were supposed to suddenly become scoring threats inside? Of course not. Tim Frazier and Edwards are good freshmen, but Frazier isn’t a good outside shooter and he can only drive in one direction. Edwards is sloppy and often takes bad shots.
Defensively, they’re just very poor. They don’t do anything like transition defense or help defense. You will often see a wide open player hitting 3s against them.
This team has been in close games but they have no trustworthy players, leading to Battle forcing the plays.
by ReadingRambler on Jan 31, 2010 11:58 AM EST reply actions













